Posted on 01/15/2014 7:49:12 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The 10th Amendment is now dead.
Why are the federal judges trying to foist something on us that is wrong, unacceptable to normal society, favoring something that is immoral, and violates the 10th and 11th ammendment to the Constitution by calling it unconstitutional? The federal judges are the ones distorting the Constitution.
This Federal Judge has violated the Constitution. His opinion is VOID . The remedy is IMPEACHMENT. The political will to do what is right is nonexistent. “we the people ..in the Government lexicon translates “the people be damned. “
I wish they’d look at Ok’s ban on fish with wings too. That’s just not fair.
RE: Why are the federal judges trying to foist something on us that is wrong, unacceptable to normal society,
That is not what bothers me... I accept the fact that there will be idiotic, immoral, unconstitutional people sitting on the bench ( and appointed by an immoral President ).
What bothers me more is this — WHY ARE THE STATES NOT ASSERTING THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF SOVEREIGNTY?
When did we become such cowards when facing the Federal Government?
Ignore him Oklahoma, make this “judge” enforce his decree.
RE: Ignore him Oklahoma, make this “judge” enforce his decree.
EXACTLY. I’d like to see what the Feds can do about it.
The more states assert their sovereign rights, the closer we are to the original intent of the constitution.
We must remember — IT WAS THE STATES THAT CREATED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.
In the era of massive federal government expansion, simple facts are easily lost. Lest we lose hold of our plumb line, even the simplest, most basic tenets of our founding principles bear repeating.
I agree! I’ve wondered the same thing for some time, dating back to Roe versus Wade. Harry Blackman’s decision states that since one state had free access to abortion, the other 49 states had to go along. Wrong!
“The Court holds that Oklahoma’s constitutional amendment limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” U.S. District Court Judge Terence Kern wrote.
Wrong Amendment moron.. If the Equal Protection clause allows Homosexuals to marry then it has to allow all others to marry. People that want more then one husband or wife. Brothers and sisters, pedophiles, etc.
It is either equal protection or it is not.........
where in the Constitution does it mandate “gay marriage?”
So much for “government of the people, by the people, and for the people”.
What’s left to the Constitution? What’s left to the States rights? Not a damn thing in this land ruled by communists. The Democrats are pure communists and they have ruined America. America is finished.
We are in a dictatorship controlled by the worst communists that America has. It is unbelievable that we could have gone so far wrong. I place 60% of the blame on the American people. They have drifted in a godless breed of ignorant fools that are more like robots that the MSM and that godless Hollywood idiots have constantly pushed fantasy and left reality out of their lives.
When are State Supreme Courts going to start ruling Federal Courts have no standing to change state law?
judges GENERALLY are like insects in the light. They don’t like it.
This gives these judges a way to pass the buck.
Also keep in mind all these judges know each other as friends and collegues.
It would not suprise me to know the fix was in. Judicial college seminars need to be recorded and public.
fun·da·men·tal
[fuhn-duh-men-tl]
adjective
1.serving as, or being an essential part of, a foundation or basis; basic; underlying: fundamental principles; the fundamental structure.
2.of, pertaining to, or affecting the foundation or basis: a fundamental revision.
3.being an original or primary source: a fundamental idea.
4.Music. (of a chord) having its root as its lowest note.
noun
5.a basic principle, rule, law, or the like, that serves as the groundwork of a system; essential part: to master the fundamentals of a trade.
How is homosexuality an ‘essential’ basis or part of our society?
Where in the Constitution, was it proclaimed that homosexuality is a “fundamental” principle, or structure of the foundation of this nation?
Where in the Constitution, does it support that these assertions are an “original, or primary idea?
Where in the Constitution, does it say that homosexuality has served as the “groundwork” of our system?
NEVER FORGET....The Devil is a LIAR. And the father OF THEM.
What about incest? Why can’t a brother and a sister get married? Look at how wonderful Prince Jofry turned out in Game of Thrones, handsome, tall, sociopathic...
They will get to incest sooner rather than later. And the libertarians will be on the same side as the left again.
Even France finally banned incest in 2010
Awww. What about gay incest?
Brotherly love. Not like your motherly or otherly love...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.