Given the known operating environment in Benghazi, much less North Africa, a strong military leader would have ensured there was a viable plan in place to rescue Americans should the need arise."
I see. After informing them of the need, it's Dempsey's fault that he didn't get Zero and Hillary to issue the orders to protect the consulate. Perhaps a "strong military leader" (you know, the very people Zero and Hillary despise) would have grabbed their hands and moved their pens for them.
posted on 01/15/2014 9:27:43 AM PST
(0-Care IS Medicaid; they'll pull a sheet over your head and take your home to pay for it.)
I think it means a strong military leader would have responded to any and ALL input regarding the atmosphere, made the attempt to utilize the chain of command, but remain in contact with the operatives and ordered, on the spot, retalitory action
posted on 01/15/2014 9:40:18 AM PST
(I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson