Skip to comments.Kansas middle school: poster listing sex acts part of 'Health and Science' curriculum
Posted on 01/16/2014 12:50:53 PM PST by lowbridge
The father of a 13 year-old girl who was upset by a classroom poster that listed sex acts was shocked to hear that the poster is part of her schools health and science curriculum.
As local Fox News affiliate in Kansas, fox4kc.com,reported Tuesday, Mark Ellis said his daughter, a student at Hocker Grove Middle school in the Shawnee Mission School District, was shocked by what she saw on a poster on a classroom wall in school. Ellis said his daughter took a picture of the poster and showed her parents.
Originally, Ellis assumed the poster to be a student prank, until he called the school and discovered it was part of the curriculum.
Why would you put it in front of 13 year-old students? he asked.
The poster, entitled, How Do People Express Their Sexual Feelings? lists sex acts such as: Oral Sex, Sexual Fantasy, Caressing, Anal Sex, Dancing, Hugging, Touching Each Others Genitals, Kissing, Grinding, and Masturbation.
Ellis said after being told by the school principal the poster was teaching material, he is now concerned about what his daughter is being taught in school.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Better late than never.
If I find that poster in my middle school the sanitation department is going to have to wipe the remains of the teacher off the floor.
Sends her to “public” school and is now shocked.
Why is the left doing this to the children?
Are you sure there’s an “l” in that word?
Notice how they mix innocent ones in with the hardcore stuff.
I’m surprised the poster isn’t illustrated. I guess that part must be in the text book.
Destruction of the family.
The biblical/Christian purpose of a family is to have godly offspring.
This is about destroying them.
And that’s the basis of why the left promotes this stuff.
Nothing says “I like you” more than Anal Sex.
I find it sexually exciting to punch clueless public school administrators in the face
Great... now they’ll put stick figures in the next one.
The people who are pushing this should be tarred and feathered...,as a start. Really.
A picture of the poster is at the link. I expected graphic live pictures of said acts. But its just text. So what?
I’m supposing the graphic pics are in the textbook. And on Fridays they show videos from internet porn sites for extra clarification.
And who are we to judge how you express your sexuality?
Funny. And just think they are going after the Catholic Church for some gay priests who committed “child abuse.”
Not all public schools are the same, this teacher might have come from a liberal background and will now face something they never expected - Parent Involvement.
We still have Weekday here in our elementary schools, they walk the kids to a local church and have non-denominational religious studies once a week. They even try that crap here in a middle school and there would be such an outcry like you couldn’t believe.
Some places are still decent around the country, you just never hear about them because stuff like this never happens there is all.
Well yeah....the U.S. under this dumba$$ resident is ranked somewhere below 57 in Science and Technology and Math and Reading, but by God our 13 year olds need to know as much as there is to know about anal sex...because that’s important to this administration. Don’t worry about those pesky subjects like math and science, you just be quiet and pay attention to the unqualified idiot standing in the front of the classroom spewing this non-sense and then be sure to run off and get pregnant and an STD and get your free tax payer subsidized abortion...God Bless America.
Kudos to the teen for alerting her parents!
Russia has laws about this which has the hedonists upset.
What, no twerking?
Just imagining a “Leave it to Beaver” episode, in which a still-sqeaky voiced 13-year-old Wally is looking over the list on the school door, and sees his latest crush, Mary Jane Saunders, and goes up and tells her, “gee, Mary Jane. It says here that a nice way for me to express my affection for you is to engage in anal sex.”
In Kansas? Really? What the heck!?
What do you mean by that ?
Nothing on the list about “self-restraint - I’m only thirteen”
Part of the Communist manifesto.
The list might have been compiled BMC (Before Miley Cyrus).
"Talking" is listed twice. One must've been a typo.
Notice Anal Sex is fourth from the top and Vaginal Intercourse is fourth from the bottom.
Seriously, what is the EDUCATIONAL purpose of this poster? Is it supposed to teach middle-school children something? If so, what? Different sexual activities? Things to experiment with? Broadened sexual license?
Does it really serve any purpose except to titillate susceptible teens? As if that’s necessary with the hormone tsunami they’re already experiencing ...
Cuddling on the couch. But cramming two people on the recliner is strictly asexual.
They forgot fisting and urinating on each other. Maybe it is on the back?
A quick story about this. (Nothing an adult can’t read here, but if you’re sensitive you should maybe go to another thread anyway?)
A very nice (and pretty) young nursing assistant (looked all of 13, was reportedly actually 17) came into a class to explain how to avoid getting AIDS. (Yes, I know, there is a very simple explanation how to avoid getting AIDS... but anyway...)
she passed out cards to the class, each with a “sexual practice” (are we working out for the Olympics?) on them...
and asked each recipient to stand up, introduce themselves, read the card, and then explain what “their” sex practice was like...
(there were about three dozen cards...I’ll spare you trying to remember all the sexual practices, did you know there were that many ways of ...??? ... just that there didn’t seem to be any omissions ... fu**ing, fis*ing, felc*ing, just for starters, and it went rapidly downhill from there)
Some of the people in the class were unfamiliar with “their” sexual practice, and the little girl (young lady) nurse assistant then proceeded to describe each one in detail for the “benefit” of all.
She concluded her “talk” by pulling out the world’s largest cucumber... (would have made John Holmes proud, except it was, of course, bright green...hum...maybe that was his problem?). She used it to demonstrate how to install a condom (that was, obviously, size XXXXXXXXXXXXL, yes, the same ones I use.../s)
At any event, the teacher later said he was unfamiliar with many of the “sex practices” too .... you could tell, because he was standing up there red as a beet as the young lady described all her “sexual practices”
Somehow, I think most of this “sex ed” stuff is better left to the parents. Maybe a nice, carefully-prepared accurate brochure could help. That’s about it. I don’t think we need all these governmental interventions in our private lives, or in the classrooms of America. Just my 2cents.
Whips and chains, leather collars with leashes?
They cover that the following year...
The only purpose it serves is to attempt to normalize certain acts (such as anal sex) by promoting them as a “typical” way to express your sexual feelings - like cuddling.
Catch up, Mom and Dad. Kids are fully informed on sex before they are 10. Their sources may be evil, but they are fully informed.
Home school. I’m just saying.
..but don’t draw a gun
Hugging and anal sex - just two wonderful options for children fond of one another.
,,,,because a gay heads the education system of this country
There, fixed it.
“A picture of the poster is at the link. I expected graphic live pictures of said acts. But its just text. So what?”
I agree. It’s just text, and clinically-descriptive text, at that.
Parents should, of course, have the option of pulling their kid out of the class, but I don’t think the poster is problematic in itself.
They really bad thing is when my son rode the middle school / high school bus home he probably heard far worse.
We wanted to complain, but part of the kids route home was through the neighborhood referred to as “Bucktown” so if we did and the kids found out is was us it would have been twice as bad for him.
Kids with internet cellphones see a whole lot worse than that.
I know... not my kids, right?