Skip to comments.ABC's 'Bachelor' Juan Pablo Galavis Says Gays Shouldn't Be on the Reality TV Show
Posted on 01/18/2014 11:05:28 AM PST by skimbell
ABC's latest Bachelor says he doesn't think that there should be a gay or bisexual on the broadcast reality television show and described gays as "more pervert in a sense" in a new interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at hollywoodreporter.com ...
Reasonable and truthful statement.
Yep. The gays will force it now and ruin something else...
Leftist journalists are now contemplating how they deal with him being Hispanic and “homophobic”. Not in their playbook (yet).
From a ratings standpoint, putting homosexuals on doesn’t make any sense. Two percent of the population, who the heck wants to see them anyway?
Captain Obvious and Captain Understatement combine forces!!
I’ve heard talk that they might have same sex dance couples on Dancing With The Stars.
Imagine that. How many people want to tune in to see some openly homosexual people, such as Rosie O’Donnell, dancing with a same sex partner???
A twitter apology from this guy in 4..........3.........2...
Him losing his job in 2............
Or anywhere else in the public eye
The other day, I was just flipping through the channels and I ran into two female lesbian talk show hosts (you know who they are) back to back on different stations, ads for Glee and Modern Family, and two separate ads for boner medication.
I think they are trying to brainwash us into thinking that everyone is either gay or in need of boner medication.
I want a freaking break.
Why is it that gays ALWAYS have to include “I’m gay” into EVERYTHING???
example: “Hi I’m Bob. I’ve worked here for 6 years and I’m gay...”
Usually followed by - “do you have a problem with that?” (so we can target YOU if you answer incorrectly)
I’ve known HETEROSEXUALS all my life and never ONCE have they introduced themselves by name, followed by ... oh, I have sex with women! or whatever...
Don’t tell me they don’t shove their perversion in our faces.
” don’t think it’s a good example for kids to watch that on TV. “
Oh oh, I can just see the ABC executives scrambling to cover their butts on this one and make no mistake they will be making Juan do the obligatory “apology” tour on TV.
These “gays” if they keep this up will manage to expand their quest to where they become persona non grata to LIBERALS.
That’s the trouble with giving in to a blind passion. You can’t stop it. It will run you painfully into a brick wall sooner or later.
But consider: I teach college (government). When the topic of homosexuality comes up as a matter of public policy, I ask the class to estimate the percentage of people that are homosexual.
Each time I ask, each class, they estimate the percentage as anywhere between 20-30% of the population being homosexual.
You can see, the brainwashing is well in progress and college-age and early 20’s are (I think) the target audience of those shows and therefore ratings would suffer if the college-age/20-somethings perceived the show was critical or non-accepting of homosexuality. . .and that would include NOT having the usual happy, well-adjusted, mature, quirky-funny enlightened homosexual on the show.
After all, these young’uns are accepting of homosexuality and are not turned off by the thought of homosexuality and what it truly is and their practices.
Just a thought. . .
When you toss in overt sympathizers, maybe the number gets that big.
They already did that.
Ironic, but that character is a reflection of the time when even this kind of sinning had more integrity.
If it were up to DU they would have a straight guy and a bunch of trannies to choose from and he would not be allowed to walk away.
Maybe they’ll call him a “white hispanic” just like George Zimmerman.
Yup. . .but the students actually feel that is the percentage that ARE homosexual.
When I point out that the Kinsey study was deeply flawed and wrong, and a scientifically rigorous study demonstrated the number is around 1-2%, they are shocked, I mean actually SHOCKED by that number.
Didn’t they already do something like that, but it was one of the contestants that was a tranny. . .I forget which show. . .but I do remember a show that actually did that.
It would be curious to try to figure out why the estimate is that large.
After all, they are out there walking around in this society. It should soon be obvious that the “queer” forces aren’t that great.
Kinsey is like the psycho-sexual equivalent of AGW. Except that really is an insult to AGW.
wouldn’t it be refreshing if at least a few of actors / reality stars (whatever) held their ground and did not apologize for speaking the truth that most people really believe. That is what gets me - most straight liberals are disgusted by gay behavior. They are liars if they say otherwise.
Maybe Phil is leading the way
I’m not sure its even 1% to tell the truth
I have no idea. I watch very little TV
At any rate, the numbers things is in a sense a diversion from what matters. Suppose it really was 20%.
I’ll give you my straightest (no pun intended) shot at what I see here. These are mostly men who are missing the love in their lives needed to bring them up to being confident in being heterosexual (either actively or potential). So they go for substitute love in the form of weird sex practices and/or popular acclaim. Now that the latter looks like a more promising source, they do go for that more.
The answer is deeply theological, and it is practical applied theology. Here’s where I generally have to forcefully cut through a whole lot of presuppositions on the part of religious folks. No, don’t stone them. No, don’t normalize their practice. Yes, do single them out... for love, not hate. Targeted love. Gospel. With emphasis on how it can boost them to where God wanted them to be in the first place before they got tangled up with hell’s demeaning lies about humanity.
There are people who will race others to the bottom to prove that they are tolerant and that would give those types of people what they want.
GLAAD will begin the bombardment soon. I hope he stands firm.
I have asked that question. They respond by referring to all the homosexuals on TV and in movies as proof somehow that homosexuality is common. This leads to a discussion about media manipulation and how movies and TV shape social values.
They “don’t ask” and blissfully go through their day thinking homosexuals are in great number, as they KNOW you can’t tell if anyone is homosexual of not, you see, because on TV good-looking feminine lesbians are everywhere on TV (see Chicago Fire, for example), and the usual dumpy masculine lesbian is hardly to be found (if at all.) So, to the brain-dead students this means homosexuals are out there in great number but you just can’t see them.
I’ve had conversations in class about this. Yes, I know, walking a dangerous path discussing homosexual disinformation in college class. Thus far, no radical homosexual has gone after my, ahem, head.
I had worked drug rehab many years ago. One of the places I worked I did orientation on the midnight shift. The nurse and tech both came on wearing the same type outfit blue striped shirt and blue slacks. (we did not wear uniforms)
Once we finished an admission they(both women) came out with with a homosexual theme magazine.
They didn’t come out and say outright “We are lesbian, so get used to it.” But then I could figure that out from their reading material.
Hmm, the TV box is reality.
Logical enough for an increasingly mutually estranged society.
I do not blame the TV. It is a box with no will. The TV is a resource for God or the devil, for good or ill.
If it sounds like I am sharpening a gospel axe on my grindstone, you would be correct. And I’m not ashamed of that. God is going to not get ignored, even if the world has to half go to hell first.
Which begs the question: If you took out a Bible and started reading it, would they have complained?
Looks like we’re dominating the comment section. Thanks Drudge
I dunno, they nailed Zimmerman pretty good, but he didn’t have a Hispanic name.
We need people steeped enough in the Lord to be bold about approaching such people and convincing them that God cares more about them than they could ever guess. And this may be a gradual process. One grand sermon probably won’t work (but never discount the possibility, never say never). But typically many battles have to be fought to win a war, and it’s going to reap the person who witnesses some opposition. But it will also reap that person God’s blessings... and that would even be things like a new and better job if they get kicked out of their old one.
O’Donnell and Maddow? Ugh!
GBLTABCDisney wants to put homosexuals and transexuals on dating shows with heteros? For what reason?
To embarrass heteros.
I hope they do it. Then the whole world can see their audience dry up. Might be a tipping point for the gay agenda In this country.
Yep, he’ll be a “white hispanic” by sundown.
It’s a side effect of being love starved. They used to get fed via sex. Now they want celebration (and to be fair, I think that their sex appetite WILL wane as they get more celebration... it’s about the love, not the sex).
The "gayest" city in the United States is Washington DC with a 10 percent homosexual population. That includes members of the mediacracy.
They push a "10+%" meme because that is what Pink Journalists do.
Hey, Kinsey is holy writ to them, so it makes a twisted sense :-(
How come this show isn’t in development?
“The BiCurious Bachelor”
A young man who has always thought he was straight finds himself wondering what sex with a man would be like. Hundreds of gay men vie for the chance to be His First.
[Hey, Kinsey is holy writ to them]
I mean to those willing to use any kind of sex to get the love they crave, how can a pack of child molesters possibly be wrong???
Oh get outta here!
(I confess to a chuckle and a snort... please don’t share that idea with Hollywood. It might be the next big thing.)
[please don’t share that idea with Hollywood. It might be the next big thing.]
And I mean it... because homo men tend to get the biggest buzz off of the straightest looking partners. They are more credible idols, from the theological/spiritual perspective.
Now what when this straight guy, when about to bed with the partner... instead shares the gospel with the gay...
Woo hoo. Scandalize EVERYBODY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.