Skip to comments.Income Inequality: Fact And Fiction
Posted on 01/25/2014 9:00:29 PM PST by Innovative
Americans who hope for more such fairness should be very worried about Obamas agenda. Yes, it sounds very much like what they want, but if Obamas presidency has demonstrated anything, it is that he produces results that are the opposite of what he preaches (Exhibit A: Obamacare).
Government redistribution designed to reduce income inequality rewards and subsidizes those who are less productive and penalizes the productive. The result is that the ranks of the unproductive swell while those of the wealth-producers shrink. Society gets poorer.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
Income inequality hurts economic growth, researchers say
Now, a new paper argues, inequality is not only bad for those at the bottom. It is also bad for economic growth as a whole and a major reason why the recovery from the Great Recession has been so weak.
Dang, still waiting to hear what the correct wage distribution is. Not sure if I’m earning enough, too much, etc.
more of the non working people wanting mo money for no work.
they print more money EVERY, SINGLE, DAY... it's up to ME as to how much of it I bring home.
...it is that the media will never again be able to disrupt a campaign because of a candidate's past drug use, alleged or real.
Commies never talk about Economic MOBILITY, they always whine about Economic Equality...
[ Dang, still waiting to hear what the correct wage distribution is. Not sure if Im earning enough, too much, etc. ]
If you told a dim about your problem no doubt they would suggest to re-distribute some of that excess back to the DNC....
This is a big deal if you’re a political because the guy who gets to decide who is worth what, owns you.
I believe the old Russian saying was “We pretended to work and they pretended to pay us”.
Now, legal plunder can be committed in an infinite number of ways. Thus we have an infinite number of plans for organizing it: tariffs, protection, benefits, subsidies, encouragements, progressive taxation, public schools, guaranteed jobs, guaranteed profits, minimum wages, a right to relief, a right to the tools of labor, free credit, and so on, and so on. All these plans as a whole with their common aim of legal plunder constitute socialism.
Now, since under this definition socialism is a body of doctrine, what attack can be made against it other than a war of doctrine? If you find this socialistic doctrine to be false, absurd, and evil, then refute it. And the more false, the more absurd, and the more evil it is, the easier it will be to refute. Above all, if you wish to be strong, begin by rooting out every particle of socialism that may have crept into your legislation. This will be no light task.
Frederic Bastiat, the Law, 1850
So the guy whose family vacation cost the American taxpayers 20+ millions of dollars is going to lecture us about income inequality?
Then we have to be the press.
Our founders won our independence with nothing more than broadsides printed on crude presses, and hand-written letters delivered by men on horseback.
We have cell phones, and computers, and the internet, and free email, and free social networks, and free web radio, and free web video, and free websites, and more.
If we fail to communicate with one another, it will be because we lack the will, not because we lack the means.
Why did the East Germans want to flee?
At risk of their lives?
They had all those great government benefits.
“Why did the East Germans want to flee?
At risk of their lives?
They had all those great government benefits.”
I bet inequality was pretty low in East Germany before the wall fell.
Yes everyone was equally poor, except the ruling classes, of course.
It is Obama’s goal that more people become poor so that more will become dependent on government and vote Democrat.
My bad, a correction: “What happens is what we’ve seen for the last five years - the press will NOT challenge government abuse of power if the president is a Democrat who pursues policies designed to destroy the country.”
I think money should be removed from Sasha and Malia’s college fund to buy me a bunch of new stuff. I feel this would be “only fair”.
If the Democrats can turn out those four groups at the same rate white voters turn out, the game is up for Conservatives.
In a democracy, the Left doesn't need to win the argument.
They just need to win the election.
Every time they bring this up, we should say “yes, there is income inequality. Government workers make far more than comparable workers in the private sector. So let’s begin, Mr. President by removing oh, ten percent from government worker pay checks and transfer this to private sector workers. “
If we all do this, they’ll shut up about income inequality pretty quickly.
Simple three step plan for ending income inequality. It works every time it’s tried.
1.) Improve your value to the labor market by improving your skills and education
2.) Get a job.
3.) Work hard at that job.
They just need to win the election.
That's why the vote should be denied to those on the dole. It's a conflict of interest for them to be voting.
income inequality: Just another focus-group/poll tested lib Rat talking point designed to deceive and distract low info voters. Seems like it appeared all at once everywhere after Christmas. Anybody else see the strategy at work?
Fallacy of the omitted variable. In a nutshell the government response to the Great Recession was to print money and give it to large banks. That's a great way to both continue the recession and increase income inequality.
Inequality is the result of inequality.
For many reasons some just don’t have it. Being unequal makes them unequal
Unless it's a Republican, then they'll challenge 24/7/365.
ENvy, jealousy and covetousness now comes wrapped in a pios veneer called “income inequality” In this way sin struts about as high-minded virtue. Evil is now good.
What is "income equality"? Is it a ratio between two or more incomes? I assume every other ratio is incorrect and becomes income inequality. It is important to know what income equality is so you can recognize income inequality when you see it. Is there a target ratio we should seek?
The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal. Aristotle
It is a wise man who said that there is no greater inequality than the equal treatment of unequals Felix Frankfurter
I may just be afraid that discussing income inequality will be similar to discussing man caused global warming. Everyone is discussing it but no one knows what the atmospheric temperature should be.
A market-derived system of free enterprise capitalism must have unequal incomes. This will be true under any government whose primary function is to protect the property rights of its citizens. Other forms of government may have equal incomes, which means the citizens may be comfortable but they have nowhere to go.
Your fair wage can be determined by adding your salary to that of (Oprah, Chuck Schumer, Rachel Maddow, Bill Gates, John Kerry, Al Gore - Take your pick) then dividing it by two. You get half and they get to keep half (unless you make more than they).
Choose one and be sure to write them tomorrow telling him/her that you COMPLETELY agree with their published statements on the need for an equitable distribution of wealth in this country. Be sure to get a Certified Check!
|Free Republic 1st Quarter Fundraising Target: $85,000||Receipts & Pledges to-date: $24,042|
|Woo hoo!! And the first 28% is in!! Thank you all very much!!|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.