Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HSBC imposes restrictions on large cash withdrawals (Bank Run Fears in UK)
BBC News ^ | 24 January 2014 Last updated at 14:59 ET | Bob Howard

Posted on 01/26/2014 9:33:19 AM PST by SkyPilot

Some HSBC customers have been prevented from withdrawing large amounts of cash because they could not provide evidence of why they wanted it, the BBC has learnt.

Listeners have told Radio 4's Money Box they were stopped from withdrawing amounts ranging from £5,000 to £10,000.

HSBC admitted it has not informed customers of the change in policy, which was implemented in November.

The bank says it has now changed its guidance to staff. New rules

Stephen Cotton went to his local HSBC branch this month to withdraw £7,000 from his instant access savings account to pay back a loan from his mother.

A year before, he had withdrawn a larger sum in cash from HSBC without a problem.

But this time it was different, as he told Money Box: "When we presented them with the withdrawal slip, they declined to give us the money because we could not provide them with a satisfactory explanation for what the money was for. They wanted a letter from the person involved."

Mr Cotton says the staff refused to tell him how much he could have: "So I wrote out a few slips. I said, 'Can I have £5,000?' They said no. I said, 'Can I have £4,000?' They said no. And then I wrote one out for £3,000 and they said, 'OK, we'll give you that.' "

He asked if he could return later that day to withdraw another £3,000, but he was told he could not do the same thing twice in one day. Continue reading the main story “Start Quote

As this was not a change to the Terms and Conditions of your bank account we had no need to pre-notify customers of the change” HSBC wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bankrun; cash; cashwithdrawals; collapse; economy; hbsc; hsbc; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: SkyPilot

ping


21 posted on 01/26/2014 10:34:07 AM PST by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Best answer yet!


22 posted on 01/26/2014 10:39:48 AM PST by Ellendra ("Laws were most numerous when the Commonwealth was most corrupt." -Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KrisKrinkle

They are acting in line with what they feel their role is and not, in my view, doing so as a matter of protecting the elderly. Here is why:

Back in the 80’s when I was stationed in the UK, we set-up a checking account with the local Barkley’s Bank.

With the check-book came a ‘bank guarantee card.’ This card had an amount stamped on it.

When you purchased something with a check you had to show the store your bank guarantee card. The bank would only guarantee the amount printed on the card and any amount over that would be the responsibility of the store, not the bank, if the check bounced.

In addition, there was a calendar on the back of the checkbook, and when you wrote a check the store would mark that date on you checkbook calendar. They did this to identify to other stores that you had already wrote a check that day and might be over the ‘guarantee’ limit.

This process was dictated by the bank and the bank basically looked at you are an irresponsible child when it came to your own money.

So, IMHO, what they are doing now is in line with what they did years before: They are not doing this to protect the elderly or whoever, but to protect themselves.


23 posted on 01/26/2014 10:45:12 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Major Chinese banks raise deposit interest to maximum
http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?cid=1202&MainCatID=12&id=20140125000103

Trying to hold onto cash?


24 posted on 01/26/2014 10:51:01 AM PST by EBH ( The Day of the Patriot has arrived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Four or five years ago I wanted to withdraw 5,000 cash from my BoA account, they would only let me take out part of it—2,500? 3,000? (don’t recall the exact).

My husband was with me and so he just withdrew the remainder from his account and I transferred it back to him.

I also noticed while in line that an elderly man was taken out of the bank teller line and shown to the ATM.

I still don’t understand why that happened. Somebody told me that you need to contact the bank ahead for such a withdrawal.

Guess I’m just a silly hick because I figured it’s my money and I can withdraw it whenever I want. It’s not like the bank didn’t have it.

/shrug...I don’t understand the world today.


25 posted on 01/26/2014 10:55:36 AM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

Legally, once you deposit funds in a bank, it is NO LONGER your money. It is the bank’s, and you just have a lien on it, similar to the mortgage they hold, on the home you own.


26 posted on 01/26/2014 11:00:44 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Legally, once you deposit funds in a bank, it is NO LONGER your money. It is the bank’s, and you just have a lien on it, similar to the mortgage they hold, on the home you own.


27 posted on 01/26/2014 11:00:56 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Legally, once you deposit funds in a bank, it is NO LONGER your money. It is the bank’s, and you just have a lien on it, similar to the mortgage they hold, on the home you own.


28 posted on 01/26/2014 11:01:13 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Legally, once you deposit funds in a bank, it is NO LONGER your money. It is the bank’s, and you just have a lien on it, similar to the mortgage they hold, on the home you own.


29 posted on 01/26/2014 11:01:42 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

But if you say that you want to buy drugs, maybe HBSC will be more. sympathetic. You would after all help fund HBSC’s operations.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/hsbc-s-1-9b-money-laundering-settlement-approved-by-judge-1.1377272


30 posted on 01/26/2014 11:02:00 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

Legally, once you deposit funds in a bank, it is NO LONGER your money. It is the bank’s, and you just have a lien on it, similar to the mortgage they hold, on the home you own.


31 posted on 01/26/2014 11:02:05 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

Legally, once you deposit funds in a bank, it is NO LONGER your money. It is the bank’s, and you just have a lien on it, similar to the mortgage they hold, on the home you own.


32 posted on 01/26/2014 11:02:41 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Interesting story, thanks for providing it. I didn’t see anything in the writeup, though, as to what the Chinese bank interest rate was, only that it was 10% higher. Any idea what their effective rate is?


33 posted on 01/26/2014 11:03:34 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
Guess I’m just a silly hick because I figured it’s my money and I can withdraw it whenever I want.

Bank Deposits

Read the part about surrendering title to your cash. You are essentially an unsecured creditor.

34 posted on 01/26/2014 11:06:06 AM PST by Stentor (Maybe the Goldman Sachs thing is just a coincidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Stentor
Read the part about surrendering title to your cash. You are essentially an unsecured creditor

True - and just think how "secure" your 401K or IRA really are.

People think there would have to be all sort of hoops for the government to jump through before that would happen, and they even believe the courts will stop them. It will never even get to the courts if there is a big enough "crisis."

35 posted on 01/26/2014 11:14:44 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Yup.


36 posted on 01/26/2014 11:15:11 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Update:

Furious Backlash Forces HSBC To Scrap Large Cash Withdrawal Limit

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-26/furious-backlash-forces-hsbc-scrap-large-cash-withdrawal-limit


37 posted on 01/26/2014 11:17:09 AM PST by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
Since most major transactions today are all electronic, the government can see everything.

Years ago, there were only "flags" thrown up if you were frequently withdrawing or depositing in excess of $10,000. Today, that threshold can be zero. Just as the NSA can run millions of phone searches using spy software, the banks and the government "see" everything.

38 posted on 01/26/2014 11:18:22 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

I still don’t understand it or maybe I should say I don’t like it. hahaha


39 posted on 01/26/2014 11:18:37 AM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I hope the government gets cataracts.


40 posted on 01/26/2014 11:19:54 AM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson