Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware The Internet of Things
Guardian ^ | 1/26/2014 | Guardian

Posted on 01/26/2014 1:32:04 PM PST by Dallas59

Right now, hordes of fevered scientists around the globe are pulling all-nighter after desperate all-nighter. They haven't changed their clothes for weeks. The walls of their laboratories are speckled with fist-sized craters, each marking a different failure. Their marriages are in ruin, their children strangers to them. And it's all because Back to the Future: Part II was set less than two years from now.

"Damn it, Bob," one jaundiced, coffee-stained boffin is yelling at his semi-comatose colleague. "These people were promised hoverboards. If we don't have a working hoverboard in production by Christmas, there will be riots. These animals will have our heads." Bob shrugs. He's too exhausted to care. He has been at this since 1989. He can't remember what the sky looks like any more. He's going to be torn limb from limb by a mob of strangers furious that science hasn't met the fanciful advances hinted at by popular culture 25 years ago, and he's OK with that.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: backtothefuture; blacktothefuture; connection; internet; paranoia; paranoid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Farmer Dean

I’ve already dug my bunker, LOL!


21 posted on 01/26/2014 2:46:31 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Ya know, America would probably be well on our way to the future envisioned by the sc-fi guys if socialist politicians in the 60s didn't divert our resources and talents to reducing Americans to 3rd world levels. Done solely for the gain of power released in such a shift.
22 posted on 01/26/2014 2:57:13 PM PST by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Every time I hear someone wishing for flying cars, my first thought is “Have you seen the way people drive when they’re on the ground?!?!”


23 posted on 01/26/2014 2:58:19 PM PST by Ellendra ("Laws were most numerous when the Commonwealth was most corrupt." -Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
I really wanted that piece of hardware, until I read about all the installation problems and weird things happening after DIY installs. They have installers to do it for about $125, but the unit's got some 'bugs' which need to be ironed-out. Plus, the fact that some Google founders bought the company, creeps me out. That's just ceding too much domicile control to others, via WiFi. I have an ancient 2006 Nokia 6060 "Clamshell" cellphone; no 'smartphone' and don't want one.
24 posted on 01/26/2014 3:07:51 PM PST by Carriage Hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

A FReepathon!

Hmmm...
One-off or Monthly?

Ping to Donate.

25 posted on 01/26/2014 3:17:58 PM PST by moose07 (the truth will out ,one day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

People have been complaining about the NSA spying, and the IoT would be a massive new way for the NSA to find out what people are up to. Not only that, but, Google and MS and Facebood and Twitter and any company that has a vested interest, would all have the means to get at your data and all of the data that the IoT generates.

But, mostly, the IoT is a bunch of hooey. Most people are tired already of so much of their data and privacy being invaded, and most will resist the IoT as just stupid. Not every idea is a good idea, and this IoT is just a dumb one, no matter how many tout is as big as the invention of the wheel, or some such thing. There will be many who are are technically inclined to adopt all new gadgets and technology, but, the majority of people will reject this IoT thing, or in the least, they won’t care to use the tech. It won’t be the first time that a technology will have been rejected.

Now, if the tech was to be connected only internally within a home (or business), and not sending out any signals to the internet and the rest of the world, perhaps the technology stands a better chance of adoption.


26 posted on 01/26/2014 6:29:32 PM PST by adorno (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson