Skip to comments.Bill de Blasio Should Just Admit It: He Wants to Tax the Rich
Posted on 01/27/2014 9:47:44 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
New York Mayor Bill de Blasio may receive the kind of press attention most politicians would kill for, but on Monday he played the supplicant. He traveled to Albany, New Yorks capital, to plead for the state government to pass a budget that would permit him to impose the tax plan that was the centerpiece of his campaign. His chief argument is that he needs the tax in order to raise enough money to pay for universal pre-kindergarten. His secondary argument is that he is not asking for a statewide tax, but merely a tax over the same voters who elected him with 73 percent of the vote not three months ago. These are both great arguments. But he is eliding another argument, one that jibes much more neatly with the themes he ran on last year.
De Blasio wants to raise by .5 percent the marginal income tax rate on New York City residents who make more than $500,000 a year in order to fund what would be, by the fall of 2015, universal pre-K for the citys more than 73,000 eligible four-year-olds. He cannot do this without Albanys approval. For reasons too byzantine and depressing to go into, that means he cannot do it without Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomos approval. (For the record, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver supports de Blasios plan.) Cuomo is up for re-election in November, and will almost certainly win, but as an aspiring national figure, he wants to win handily. He has been running on a plank of keeping taxes in line. Duly, he has opposed de Blasios plan, and has seemed to play a trump card by promising to fund universal pre-K (throughout the state, in fact) with existing funds. (De Blasio has known Cuomo for 20 years, having worked for him at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and there is plenty of psychodrama there.)
De Blasio is right that making New York City subservient to Albany over its own policies is absurd. How absurd? If the citys 73,000 four-year-olds picked up and formed their own city in Westchester County tomorrow, that would be the states eighth-largest city. As de Blasio more modestly put it Monday, The citys right to self-determination ought to be honored in Albany.
De Blasio is also right that his way is a surer way of adequately funding pre-K. Cuomos initial offer$1.5 billion statewide over five years, starting with $100 million in the first yearis dwarfed by de Blasios proposal of $340 million per year for New York City alone. Cuomo subsequently revised his offer to whatever he needs, which sounds about as reliable as it is specific. As de Blasio more politely put it Monday, his way would provide more predictable and consistent funding.
So de Blasio is making two good arguments. But heres a third: His plan to tax New Yorks richest in order to fund public education is an intrinsically good thing, even before you consider what exactly the new revenues would pay for. At base, it would transfer a small amount of wealth from a very small percentage of New York Citys residents to public schoolsin theory, to all New York City residents, and for practical purposes a disproportionate number of the citys lower- and middle-class residents. In other words, it would go a small way toward rectifying the massive inequality that was all de Blasio could talk about last year, and which he was elected by three-quarters of voters to address.
But de Blasio is not saying this. Instead, opponents of de Blasios plan, from conservatives to members of Cuomos camp, are the only ones talking about the tax beyond its funding for education. A New York Daily News editorial accused de Blasio of wanting the extra funds not to fund pre-K but in order to give more money to his union supporters, many of which have new contracts to negotiate with the city. The New York Post quotes a Cuomo loyalist making the exact same argument, which is certainly a pure coincidence. (In Albany Monday, de Blasio expressly denied this, insisting that the funds from the tax would be used solely for education programs.) The News Joshua Greenman acknowledged the taxs ostensible fit with a broader progressive agenda, only to slam it down: Whatever your thoughts on the economic justice motivation of raising a local tax on the wealthy, he wrote, it now looks like an exercise in progressivism for progressivisms sake.
But thats just it. De Blasios thoughts on the economic justice of raising a local tax on the wealthy ought to be that doing so is a good thing. It isnt progressivism for progressivisms sake, it is progressivism for the sake of all the things that progressivism wants to do. Because of the states insane power over the citys purse-strings, this isnt quite a if you cant make it here, you cant make it anywhere situation. But de Blasios leverage right now consists largely in the mandate and media attention he brings. He may as well be true to himself and admit exactly why he wants this tax.
I think that conservatives deduced even before he got to be mayor that Comrade Wilhelm wants to raise taxes on the rich.
The second plank of communism in the Manifesto is “a heavy progressive or graduated income tax”; that’s always slanted against those with more.
Universal child indoctrination....
In other words, old money Democrats are safe, while working professionals get screwed.
And he makes a point of saying that NYC should be able to decide NYC’s policies. Too bad NYC mayors don’t apply the same principle when it comes to staying out of other states’ business (ie, gun grabbing).
“Universal child indoctrination....”
Anyone with brains and the ability should be moving out
If you kill a Communist Pig, does it become the People's Bacon?
I don’t understand the need for raising taxes. Those who voted for him should be gleefully opening their wallets. Those without money should be volunteering for forced labor camps.
DeBlasio wants to have pre-K so raises taxes. What about New Yorkshire unfunded pension liabilities, poor infrastructure and other contingent liabilities? He can’t deal with those not sexy enough besides that is heavy lifting
New York has lost it’s mind
Only about 22% of NYCers voted in the mayoral election, which is appalling apathy. I voted, and it sure wasn’t for SuperCommie here. So please don’t include ME as one of those who lost their mind. I saw clearly what DeBlah-blah was. I did not care for Llota, not one whit, but he was still marginally better than DeBlah-blah and his commie hordes.
They certainly don't like increased spending for the military. That's about the only area for tax increases they don't like. Keeping their country safe is probably last on their list of things they'd like tax money spent on.
No offense meant. But Warren Wilhelm is now Bill DeBlasio? Some of your fellow residents need a smack upside the head
I do not disagree with you. Must be all that expensive food that no one can afford but those on food stamps that affects the brain. Or the mental disorder known as liberalism. Whatever it is, a few of us still have antibodies for liberal baloney.