Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem senators intervene in Hobby Lobby case, urge justices to deny ObamaCare exemption
foxnews.com ^ | 1/28/14 | AP/foxnews

Posted on 01/28/2014 9:30:08 AM PST by ColdOne

arguing that "secular" businesses should not be exempt from the mandate.

The 19 senators planned to file a brief before the court, which is still weeks away from considering the closely watched case. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., who planned to make her case on the Senate floor, adamantly defended the Obama administration's side.

"What's at stake in this case before the Supreme Court is whether a CEO's personal beliefs can trump a woman's right to access free or low-cost contraception under the Affordable Care Act," she said in prepared remarks.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; antichristian; attackchristians; billgates; eugenics; hobbylobby; obamacare; scotus; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: SaintDismas

Good for them. I hope that they do. More should follow their example.


41 posted on 01/28/2014 10:11:45 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Have not heard of this before, but we all know the Court is sensitive to pressure from the other “co-equal” branches .... e.g. Robert’s decision on Obamacare! Obama’s not so subtle pressure tactic worked, so why not go back to that well?
If memory serves aren’t Christian Scientists exempt as well... so if one “secular” individual is exempt why not all Christians of similar moral belief?
The voter has been dumbed-down enough that the Dems get away with such things.... this may be liberty’s final stand!


42 posted on 01/28/2014 10:13:14 AM PST by Froggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

“What’s next, a woman’s right to Ron Jeremy. “

Excellent analogy.


43 posted on 01/28/2014 10:13:17 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I am sure they are exempt.


44 posted on 01/28/2014 10:13:47 AM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Democrats.

Sayyyy, isn’t that the party the voted THREE TIMES to deny God and Israel a place on their party platform?


45 posted on 01/28/2014 10:15:57 AM PST by null and void (We need to shake this snowglobe up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The Demcrats are establishing “god” in the party image.

See post #45...

46 posted on 01/28/2014 10:18:30 AM PST by null and void (We need to shake this snowglobe up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

Yeah, I get tired of their play on words. So basically, a woman *wanting* somebody else pay for their contraception trumps the religious rights of an individual that owns the company and defines its corporate culture.

To think that one of the founding principles of this country was religious freedom....how far we have come. It’s also curious how things that are explicitly stated in the constitution (religious freedom) are trumped by so-called “women’s rights” that appear nowhere in the constitution.


47 posted on 01/28/2014 10:19:42 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Allison_Wonderland

” Due to his religious beliefs”

That may be correct but I don’t even see why religion has to be involved in a simple matter of whether a business should be forced to pay for people to have sex without getting pregnant. The whole thing is absurd in the first place.


48 posted on 01/28/2014 10:20:09 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Good grief. Don’t these legislators know that they do not interfere with the Supreme Court.

There are thre balancing part of government:
Judicial
Legislative
Executive

Unfortunately some have not learned that telling others how to do their jobs is against the law.


49 posted on 01/28/2014 10:30:56 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

“...a CEO’s personal beliefs can trump a woman’s right to access free or low-cost contraception under the Affordable Care Act,’ she said in prepared remarks.”

So, to whom is it *free* or *low cost* ??


50 posted on 01/28/2014 10:33:31 AM PST by EDINVA ( m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

Only Cal can do that, FRiend.


51 posted on 01/28/2014 10:45:35 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...
Sorta-kinda SCOTUS ping.

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

52 posted on 01/28/2014 10:48:55 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaintDismas

Before they close them, I hope they ask every employee their oppinion. Then lay off the liberals for one week before they close. Just to point out how the communists are costing people jobs.


53 posted on 01/28/2014 10:49:11 AM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wbill

“I’m not going to pay for it.” equals “You can’t have it.” to libtards because they pay for their constituents’ bennies with OPM.

Duh! :)


54 posted on 01/28/2014 10:53:12 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

It is a full on coup by them. They know EXACTLY what they are doing.


55 posted on 01/28/2014 11:00:25 AM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; All
Instead of these Democratic senators urging the Court to deny Hobby Lobby its constitutionally enumerated right to religious expression, they need to do the following. Since previous generations of Constitution-respecting justices had officially clarified that the states have never delegated to Congress, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for public healthcare purposes, these Democrats need to address the Hobby Lobby issue in the following manner.

Democrats need to start upholding their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution by complying with the Constitution's Article V. Since Congress has no constitutional authority to address public healthcare, Article V requires Congress to petition the states to ratify an appropriate amendment to the Constitution to acquire such power. And if the states chose to ratify such an amendment, then Congress would have the specific power that it needs to establish a federal public healthcare program like Obamacare.

In other words, corrupt Congress wrongly ignored getting the required consent of the Article V state majority before it established Obamacare.

56 posted on 01/28/2014 11:00:35 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill

I thought HL already covered (with current/previous policy) contraception...just not the abortifacients that 0sCare pushes to cover.

Here’s their statement...

HHS Mandate: Hobby Lobby Explains Its Stance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py5Tqglm0dg#t=60


57 posted on 01/28/2014 11:14:58 AM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Didn’t you get the memo? Only Democrats are allowed to change Obamacare.


58 posted on 01/28/2014 11:51:34 AM PST by Personal Responsibility (I'd use the /S tag but is it really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Thank you. As I suspected that moron Sherrod Brown is on the list.


59 posted on 01/28/2014 12:03:05 PM PST by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

It shouldn’t take balls to be an opposition party. But it does if you’re being blackmailed.


60 posted on 01/28/2014 12:37:21 PM PST by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson