Skip to comments.McCaskill, who doesn’t want Bill Clinton near her daughter, angry at Rand Paul for insulting Bill
Posted on 01/28/2014 8:58:58 PM PST by chessplayer
Actually, she claims shes angry at him for insulting Hillary by supposedly implying that Hillarys somehow responsible for Bills lechery in the Oval Office. But thats not what Pauls saying. Hillarys blameless for that, he reiterated today. The reason he brought up laffaire Lewinsky this weekend is because, like every other Republican in America, hes sick of being lectured on gender sensitivity by cretins whove spent decades apologizing for the Clenis and Ted Kennedy. His attack was an attack on the Democratic Party, not on Hillary specifically. The war on women garbage isnt going to end, so he feels he has no choice but to use a blunt rhetorical object to back Democrats off. Heres a nice swing: I think that one of the things that have moved forward, one of the things that was rotten about the old patriarchal system we did have, was that bosses took advantage of young women in the workplace.
What makes this blogworthy and considerably more irritating than Ruth Marcuss giggling about thong-showing yesterday is that McCaskill herself once took a harder shot at Bill Clinton than Paul did. Remember this golden moment from Meet the Press when she was first running for Senate? That was the first strike against her in Clintonworld. Strike two came when she endorsed Obama for president over Hillary in 2008, a crucial bit of big-name support that helped establish him as a serious contender. Shes on the enemies list now and she knows it a bad place to be with the Clintons poised to return to power in 2016 so shes decided shes going to go all out to get back in the queens good graces. The Hill has a story out today noting that 57 congressional Democrats have now signaled that they support Hillary in 2016. Thats nothing: McCaskill formerly endorsed her back in June of last year, just eight months after Obamas reelection. Now, to further make amends, shes decided shes going to play attack dog for Hillary on war on women crapola.
Wouldn’t want him near my son or dog either.
You can always tell when a Clinton has been in your back yard
1. The dog’s pregnant
2. There’s gooey stuff on at least one of your sprinkler heads
3. There’s a long brown spot across your lawn
4. The trash can lids can’t be found
5. There’s a body with a new red hole in it
6. Maggie Williams is getting lots of texts
7. Hillary won’t be seen without her riding whip and Hitler mustache
“Actually, she claims shes angry at him for insulting Hillary by supposedly implying that Hillarys somehow responsible for Bills lechery in the Oval Office. “
“I’m not some Tammy Wynnette standing by my man!!!” - Hillary Clinton
What a lying Stalinist.
Hillary tolerated Willy’s infidelity. She IS partly to blame.
If I had a daughter I wouldn’t want her anywhere near Clinton in any environment where they might be alone or where he’d feel safe in coming on to her.
Then again, my daughter would have a strong sense of pride , indepence, self determination, good sense to know better, higher than average I.Q., a black belt in Tae Kwon Do and Aikido.
She’d be unbelievabley beautiful and he could only admire her from another zip code.
I think the Republicans have veered into a winner here. Whenever they are asked about any thing relating to the “Republican War on Women”, they simply start discussing Bill Clinton’s rapes of associates and interns. This has two important results: 1) It will remind listeners of Hillary Clinton’s enabler role, and 2) It will quickly lead the questioner into other topics.
It was totally inappropriate for her to subject teenaged Chelsea to that kind of knowledge and acceptance of her father's bad behavior. A strong message to all women would've been to leave the WH with daughter while it played out.
Rand Paul was interviewed on CBS this morning. His comments about Bill Clinton's behavior being something women should not accept was very good.