Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RC one

I am in favor of the death penalty in certain cases, as long as we are 100% certain we execute the correct person. When it is demonstrated that we executed someone who did not commit the crime, I will be completely opposed to the death penalty ever again being used.


7 posted on 01/29/2014 3:31:52 AM PST by 22202NOVA ("Democracy is the art of running the circus from the monkey cage." -- H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: 22202NOVA

With DNA testing foolproof you have almost a 100% chance of getting it right where blood or skin samples have been retrieved from a perp.

Of course not all cases involve perp DNA. And many cases there are no witnesses.

It’s a crap shoot. But fast execution (a year at most...not decades) is need at this time to make execution a deterant.


10 posted on 01/29/2014 3:44:50 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: 22202NOVA

OK, so they did not commit the crime. That’s ok. But what if they had a mile long rap sheet and society would be better off without them around? I’d feel guilty about it for 10 minutes.


27 posted on 01/29/2014 5:53:00 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: 22202NOVA
You have just stated the whole death penalty conumdrum: How to prevent the death of an innocent man.

Too many confounding variables.

30 posted on 01/29/2014 6:29:59 AM PST by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson