This military did so, and not too long ago, in Watertown MA...
Posted on 01/30/2014 1:26:16 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
This military did so, and not too long ago, in Watertown MA...
Self defense? The 2nd amendment is about having the arms necessary to defend yourself from the government.
Thanks for posting that photo — I am so glad that moment is recorded.
Any one of us is in that guy’s sights (has he ever been identified?).
We should never ever forget.
I think GW would have been in hog heaven.
This guy is a loon. He seems to have problems understanding the English language. What a moron. I new this was going to happen when they decided that ANYONE could be a “professor”.
Another academic whore spouting off.
“Stupid is, as stupid does...”
When the chips fall, and he gets his confiscation implemented...
I hope he is the one knocking on my door...I will be happy to receive him...
Interesting. And entirely plausible.
Since rifles -- including so-called "assault rifles" -- are used in such a small number of homicides, this doesn't explain why liberals find them so disturbing. The last time I looked it up, the most common firearm used in homicides was a revolver.
Why not ban revolvers? Or why not ban swimming pools, since they're far more dangerous than guns?
They knew exactly how destructive the media and guns could be. They understood crony capitalism, corruption, evil and abusive government.
The one thing our founders underestimated is the tenacity of our enemies and how little most Americans are willing to fight for the freedoms so many of them died for.
The founding genetic pool has been diluted to the point there is not the collective ability to succeed
I’m reading Rise to Rebellion by Jeff Shaara. Provides a great insight into the events which led up to the Declaration of Independence.
Firearms were MORE deadly in 1780, not less. The difference is medical treatment then and now. In 1780, and torso wound was fatal, and half of limb wounds, due to infection. Today, gang-bangers routinely sport multiple bullet wounds from past encounters.
In 1780, and maniac could have loaded up a goose gun or blunderbuss with 1/4 lb. of rusty nails and fired it at a church picnic, causing a dozen fatal wounds. They didn’t.
The difference is the culture, not the deadliness of firearms.
Same typo twice. AND = ANY
Same tired old fascist crap.
We need to dust off and nuke it from orbit, just to be sure to get them all.
And just because there is a right of the press, that doesn’t mean they have a right to high-speed offset presses. A “press” as the founders understood was an actual device utilizing movable type. How can somebody disseminating information over the airwaves be considered part of the press? The founders never could have imagined such a thing as pictures that traveled through the air.
It’s like saying you have a right to breath, but you can’t have any air.
What part of ‘the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.’
Does the man not understand?
As fancy as Waco?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.