[DoughtyOne]

The bi-racial nature of it doesn’t bother me 1/10th as much as the contrived idea of it for a commercial. Who cares? And since nobody does, why do it in the first place?

What kind of a statement is this? What pray tell is going to be benefited by it? What part of society needs to change, meaning this message is necessary?

It’s a message that is so far behind the times that it’s just pathetic to be pulling this routine in 2014.

Why not put an add on as if to motivate people not to object to hair cuts like the Beatles had? Same thing. Just another day in moronic Liberal moonbat central.

[rlmorel]

One of the things I enjoy in life is breakfast cereal. Not things like shredded wheat, but the bad ones. Cocoa Puffs. Sugar Smacks. Lucky Charms. Things like that.

Some Freepers are horrified that I eat them (I have actually been lectured here!) but I don't care.

I am the most ferocious breakfast cereal eater, and my Jethro Bowl is a prized utensil.

But after General Mills came out with this ad campaign during "Gay Pride Month" last year, I am not eating any more of their cereals:

"...The new campaign centers around the leprechaun-loving toasted-oat-and-marshmallow cereal and uses the handle #LuckyToBe. General Mills announced the campaign in the video above and in a press release sent to homosexual lobbying group GLAAD, in which the company declared, “We’re celebrating Pride month with whimsical delight, magical charms, and two new rainbow marshmallows. . . . If you’re lucky enough to be different, we’re celebrating you.”

It turned my stomach.