Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Do Tea Parties End? (Politico)
Politico ^ | Sunday, February 2, 2014 | Raymond A. Smith

Posted on 02/04/2014 7:10:01 AM PST by kristinn

Just how close is the Tea Party to its demise? Last week, Fox News didn’t even bother airing the group’s official response to Barack Obama’s speech, in which the president forcefully called for an end to tactics that prevent the government “from carrying out even the most basic functions of our democracy.” Even Speaker of the House John Boehner, who seemed so downtrodden last year, now has an extra spring in his step, and is daring to push for immigration reform over the vocal objections of the far right. All but the most extreme Republicans have abandoned their shutdown tactics, and though the GOP still vows to repeal Obama’s signature health law given the chance, the changing power dynamics on Capitol Hill are palpable.

Indeed, it’s been a rough few months for the Tea Party. Fewer Americans than at any time since 2010 now call themselves members or supporters of the group. The tactic of running far-right candidates in Republican primaries clearly cost the GOP control of the Senate in 2010 and again in 2012. Their intransigence also helped to prevent Mitt Romney from defeating the president they have so vilified. All this has sparked counter-mobilization by the GOP Old Guard too: Since last fall’s ill-conceived Tea Party-led gambit to shut down the government, defund the Affordable Care Act and potentially default on the national debt, establishment Republicans have boldly lashed out at conservative outside groups that once had them cowering in fear, while pouring millions of dollars into races across the country to bolster moderates against right-wing insurgents.

At the same time, some of the leading Tea Party figures on the national stage are now departing from elective office, including Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), who won’t seek reelection this year, and Jim DeMint of South Carolina, who left the Senate last year to become president of the Heritage Foundation. Others have consolidated their positions as national laughingstocks—most notably former veep wannabe Sarah Palin, but also the filibustering, Dr. Seuss-reading Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) who seems to be following the same trajectory, only faster. Others have been busy distancing themselves from the Tea Party, such as Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) taking a more moderate stance on immigration and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) choosing to emphasize civil liberties over more radical tactics..

There may still be plot twists, turns and even reversals ahead for the Tea Party, but the main question now is not if the group is in decline but what its endgame will be. Tea Party proponents have been quick to claim a long and victorious lineage in U.S. history, ranging from their namesake tax revolt in Boston in 1773 to the 1978 anti-tax Proposition 13 rebellion in California. It’s no surprise that the Tea Party is eager to stress such antecedents, since both led to huge victories: the American Revolution and the rise of Reaganism. Both historic episodes also share a heroic story of grassroots anti-government struggle followed by a supposed triumph of liberty.

So how does the Tea Party’s story end? Consider a wider lens, one that includes comparable movements in other democracies. The Tea Party is but one example of a common form of political insurgency—one that almost always loses in the long run. This kind of counter-establishment movement is common enough that comparative politics has a term for it: the “anti-system party”—a group that seeks to obstruct and delegitimize the entire political system in which the government functions. As explained by Giovanni Sartori, the Italian political scientist who coined the term in 1976, an anti-system is driven not by “an opposition on issues” but “an opposition of principle.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/02/tea-party-how-will-it-end-102984.html#ixzz2sMm1FoeM


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: teaparty
Raymond A. Smith is senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute and adjunct assistant professor of political science at Columbia University and New York University.
1 posted on 02/04/2014 7:10:01 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Whistling past the graveyard.


2 posted on 02/04/2014 7:14:59 AM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The elections are right around the corner


3 posted on 02/04/2014 7:15:09 AM PST by shadeaud (Be strong when you are weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

The Tea Party is the new anti-establishment.

An establishment that is so thoroughly corrupt that it has abandoned the middle-class to cater to special interests. A government that has sold itself to the highest bidder. A government that has become so big, it is consuming everything in its path.

This is our “Chicago ‘68”


4 posted on 02/04/2014 7:15:36 AM PST by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

This Alinsky tactics at work


5 posted on 02/04/2014 7:15:38 AM PST by John Galt's cousin (WTF? We couldn't rescue four men in Benghazi? Is our military IMPOTENT? ( /s ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3118803/posts


6 posted on 02/04/2014 7:19:58 AM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (Support Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Fox News never airs the tea party response and in fact there were three other responses besides the GOP one. It doesn’t matter on bit. The tea party still is chugging along fine.


7 posted on 02/04/2014 7:20:08 AM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Fox News never airs the tea party response and in fact there were three other responses besides the GOP one. It doesn’t matter one bit. The tea party still is chugging along fine.


8 posted on 02/04/2014 7:20:47 AM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; GeronL

And Rush Limbaugh’s going off the air and Fox News had no viewers until a liberal Democrat (”almost as liberal as Nixon!”) was elected president....

What fools these liberals be.


9 posted on 02/04/2014 7:21:00 AM PST by a fool in paradise ("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Reports of our demise are greatly exaggerated.


10 posted on 02/04/2014 7:21:33 AM PST by McGruff (I'm a Conservative. Not necessarily a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

You can write an article and declare a movement dead. Go ahead. Still you can’t force people to come out to vote or give up their money or time for a political party they don’t believe in. Not yet, anyway. Republicans won’t win elections by declaring the Tea Party dead.


11 posted on 02/04/2014 7:21:53 AM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
"The Tea Party is the new anti-establishment..." And instead of "ending" the activism will grow.  photo MarinaPensacola.jpg
12 posted on 02/04/2014 7:22:50 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 ( ...even more American than a French bikini and a Russian AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud
and won't they (GOPe/RINOs/RATs) be surprised..forward ho!

13 posted on 02/04/2014 7:24:17 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Blah blah blah... blow it out your well worn politico arses. Ask schumer and reid if we are close to demise. WE ARE THE ONES YOU SHOULD WORRY ABOUT!


14 posted on 02/04/2014 7:25:05 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
How Do Tea Parties End?

When politicians learn to uphold the Constitution!

15 posted on 02/04/2014 7:25:53 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

What the pundits from both parties don’t realize is that the Tea Party is not like them. It is not a hierarchical organization, with a president, CEO, CIO, treasurer, etc.

At the same time, it *does* have an organization, but one that is alien to their way of thinking. Thus they cannot attack, subvert, corrupt, undermine, or betray it, as they could each others organizations.

A good analogy is that they continually fight a conventional war, but their enemy is unconventional. It is everywhere, and it is nowhere. And it is slowly, and methodically, defeating them.

It is not oriented to winning any great conventional battles just yet. Instead, it steadily erodes their strengths, making them weaker, and forcing them to commit increasing resources that accomplish less and less.

And when it finally fights in a conventional way, it will be at the Republican National Convention. It will take the convention, and then it will purge the RINO old guard from power. Many of them will hang on at first, but will lose their taste for battle when they find themselves relegated to the back bench, their opinions rejected, and then just ignored.

At some point, their big money supporters will panic, realizing that they, too, have their access to government money on the line. That when the RINOs are gone, the gravy train is over. And because the Tea Party will remember their perfidy, against not just the Tea Party, but against the nation, such fat cats will soon be fighting with the ally cats for garbage can scraps.


16 posted on 02/04/2014 7:26:15 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

The establishment in both major parties are scared to death of the Tea Party. The Tea Party has the potential to unite people on issues where the democrat and republican parties exist to divide us. This keeps the people weak and the govt all powerful. It really, really scares them. Their world would come to an end if the Tea Party took over govt.


17 posted on 02/04/2014 7:26:16 AM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

It’s way past time to remind the gutter scum in DC that they derive their power from the consent of the governed!


18 posted on 02/04/2014 7:27:29 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Who but a TYRANT shoves down another man's throat what he has exempted himself from?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
2000 years ago a man named Jesus set out to simplify religious thought of the era. There were 4,000 rules, often conflicting. There were two layers of institutional barriers: Jewish clergy and Roman might.

Today we seek to clarify the US Constitution and also face two institutional layers. I pray resolution comes without martyrdom.

19 posted on 02/04/2014 7:30:53 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

What a surprise!!!


20 posted on 02/04/2014 7:33:48 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The TEA party ain't a part, perfesser.

It's the belief that government is the greediest, most corrupt and murderous force on Earth and must be held in check.

21 posted on 02/04/2014 7:37:25 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The only way women can "have it all" is if men aren't allowed to have anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

“The Tea Party is but one example of a common form of political insurgency—one that almost always loses in the long run”

California dreamin. :-)


22 posted on 02/04/2014 7:46:29 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

23 posted on 02/04/2014 7:47:08 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

What the liberals and GOPe never seemed to understand is that “Tea Party” was only an organization in their and some who tried to play Tea Party Leader minds.

It was a ground swell movement by fed up conservative minded citizens, who no more wanted someone with their own agenda to “claim” to be Tea Party leaders than we wanted nobama’s tyrannical liberal BS.

The real Tea Party movement has not gone away, it has grown where it counts.


24 posted on 02/04/2014 7:50:58 AM PST by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What was the LSM calling the founding fathers around 1776? Were they pronouncing them dead, year after year?

Or was it more ‘first they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win’?


25 posted on 02/04/2014 8:05:13 AM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

“Raymond A. Smith is senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute and adjunct assistant professor of political science at Columbia University and New York University.”

I think one approach might be a rebranding - from the “Tea Party” to the “T’d Off Party”.

This new party would clearly define itself around limited government, reduced spending, a balanced budget, drastically less government regulation, an end to almost all government surveillance of Americans and generally increased freedom. It would be blind to social issues, and welcome all who embrace the above platform.

There would be no problem with belonging to both, of course! However, I think a solid majority of Americans would get on board with the T’d Off Party platform.


26 posted on 02/04/2014 8:24:35 AM PST by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

The country has problems both with the economy and world involvement. A party has to deal with these problems. A party that is just anti-government has limited usefulness. Its future is to dissolve back into the GOP. Another one-act pony like the Prohibition Party.


27 posted on 02/04/2014 8:39:22 AM PST by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

             

TEA is merely the policy statement . . .

28 posted on 02/04/2014 8:46:38 AM PST by tomkat (it's likely behind door #4, Monty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
What the pundits from both parties don’t realize is that the Tea Party is not like them. It is not a hierarchical organization, with a president, CEO, CIO, treasurer, etc.

Bingo. To paraphrase "V is for Vendetta", "ideas are bulletproof".

29 posted on 02/04/2014 9:49:45 AM PST by Flick Lives (Got a problem with the government? Have a complaint. Get a free IRS audit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
The Tea Party is the new anti-establishment.

And, who likes to be anti-establishment? Hmmm...
Our young people are listening, and learning, and know they're gonna be paying more and more for this establishment's doings.
Tic tic tic tic tic tic tic tic...

30 posted on 02/04/2014 10:17:24 AM PST by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yep. Truly grassroot, heart of America, reasoned, seasoned, serious to the bone, and diffuse yet common. Uniparty is fearful, and for good reason.


31 posted on 02/04/2014 10:25:55 AM PST by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

You cannot stifle Free thinking and Freedom.


32 posted on 02/04/2014 10:38:48 AM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi


33 posted on 02/04/2014 11:10:17 AM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Cognitive dissonance. If running establishment RINOs is a solution, why did all those “safe candidates” lose (which cost us the Senate) ?


34 posted on 02/04/2014 7:08:39 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

It is called disinformation. Disinformation is an act of desperation.

Debbi


35 posted on 02/04/2014 11:12:57 PM PST by hearthwench (Mom, NaNa, always ornery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Actually, we’re modeled after the Mad Hatter’s Tea Party. When one place setting gets used up, you just move over one seat to a clean one.


36 posted on 02/04/2014 11:34:34 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

37 posted on 02/04/2014 11:38:12 PM PST by Daffynition ("If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." ~ Henry Ford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson