Replies

Sorry but evolution as taught is incorrect science. ... ...
Question: With genetic engineering (Frankenfood, ect.) the the creation of new species of life is a given, and most in the scientific community believe the creation of life will be a reality. .so given that at some point there will be created life ..what test is there to determined if any given lifeform is created or evolve. ..
The point is I do not dispute the evolution of life I simply point out creation of life is also a given or will be..and there is no direct test to distinguish between the two...the only test would be secondary. ..to look at the fossil record. .and in that one would expect created would be in burst vs evolution being more linear...

and most in the scientific community believe the creation of life will be a reality. .so given that at some point there will be created life

Most...in the scientific community believe....? Let's not go there. :o)

I get your point and have been loosely following the effort to move amino acids into TNA, RNA and finally DNA strands to prove that conditions and happenstance to naturally create life could have existed. But they have been stuck for a while now (time is relative, I know). The science does oddly follow the evolution science in that there are suspicious holes that provide falsifiable evidence in the study of fossils. Amino Acids do exist in nature (and space). But science is missing the link between the theoretical TNA (suspected precursor to RNA) and the amino acid. How did amino acids "evolve" into something that evolved into DNA that provided a replicatable cell structure?