Skip to comments.Bill Clinton Arrives to Calm Democratic ‘Bed-Wetting’
Posted on 02/05/2014 10:51:40 AM PST by Sub-Driver
Bill Clinton Arrives to Calm Democratic Bed-Wetting
By Jeff Zeleny @jeffzeleny Follow on Twitter Feb 5, 2014 12:42pm
The bed-wetting has begun. It may not be a pleasant image, but thats the phrase used inside Obamaworld when Democrats start worrying about their political fortunes. And nine months before the midterm elections, the worry is intensifying, particularly given the latest batch of bad news for the new health care law.
David Plouffe, the presidents former campaign manager and top political adviser, first coined the term bed-wetting back in 2008 when Democrats began openly fretting about their political challenges. He said the mood today inside the party is starting to remind him of the same moment.
When asked whether the bed-wetting phase of the 2014 campaign season was starting, he laughed and declared: Ha. Of course it is.
Democrats are indeed anxious, particularly with Republicans only six seats away from winning control of the Senate in November. By any calculation, its a tough political map. Democrats are defending Senate seats on unfriendly terrain across the South and other states where President Obama either lost decisively or struggled to win. This sets the stage for a contentious closed-door policy retreat and strategy session today that Senate Democrats are having with the president. In addition to Obama, the guest speaker is Bill Clinton, who is poised to deliver a speech, take questions and try to coach jittery Democrats how to keep their heads up during a rocky midterm election year.
Only a week after the president urged Democrats in his State of the Union address to get back on the offensive in the health care fight, a new CBO report puts them back on defense.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
I guess Clinton is the expert. After all, he prevented Congress from switching to Republican during his Presidency! Oh, wait...
The democrats are GOING DOWN. That’s why they are bringing in WC. He’s an expert.
Here I thought Obama was the messiah.
Democrats are constant bedwetters.
Term limits would fix this for the Democrats and Republicans.
Oh please, the only thing the Rats were worried about in ‘08 was if Obama or Hillary was going to be the next President.
They are SERIOULY scared right now as their base is turning against them.
Just like Bush lost his base starting in 2006.
The difference is Bush had no idea he had lost them.
The TRUTH is difficult to fight. It must be covered up with more lies and deceit...so an established liar is coming in to pep up more established liars....great strategy.
Sounds familiar, Democrats? Yeah, that guy up there helped make that happen.
You may now go back to your bed-wetting.
Did he bring Elizabeth Hurley?
I prefer to think of them as peeing in their pants.
Yo Dim, what’s that running down yo leg?
“My polls are in the crapper. But if this guy got Elizabeth Hurley to go to bed with him, maybe I should listen.”
Obama probably promised Slick Willy some hookers and rope for when he arrived..that made Bill extra pleased
Instead of Clinton, they need McCain or Graham.
What a party...when a grifting smooth-tongued carny is the best thing that sordid party of misfits can provide.
Of course, on the RINO-ublican’s side, they cannot even gin up a believable felon to lie for them. Heck, even spine-deprived bonehead is just slush.
There is nothing they can do to sell a stinking steaming hunk of crap law. Fuzzy puppies, looney gay exercise dingbats, jammy clad dipwads will never do it.
We are talking people’s lives here. This turd cannot be polished. Even Slick Willie cannot make it look good.
Picture is big enough to fall into.
I mean...not literally.
He just needs to remind them who was screwing Elizabeth Hurley and they’ll quiet right down...he da man!
They (the faint-of-heart Democrats) are not waiting until they get in bed to do the “wetting”. They are doing it standing up, in their pants, in full view of the public.
Worse when they compound it with their whining.
There’s nothing like broadband.
Extremely interesting title. Why would one vote for bed-wetting politicians and trust them to run the country?
He’ll tell them, “you better put some ice on that.”
Wow. I thought that might be a bit of creative writing on your part, BUT...
ABC said that! Expect multiple IRS audits in an effort to re-educate the network peons.
Bill Clinton believes in soiling the bed in other ways. The Democrats have been soiling Americans in the fashion of Clinton, and now that Americans want off that bed, the master comes to change our minds.
I heard Slick will be delivering his “How To Pick Up Chicks 101” lecture.
It must be pretty bad when they gotta reach out to this guy for hope.
“If you like yer soiled britches, you can keep them. Period.”
The thing is, Bush could have KEPT the base if ONLY he would have FOUGHT BACK against the liars in the media and the Democrat party.
He could have fought back AND kept the office of the Presidency dignified.
He didn’t, and neither did his successor to the nomination, Juan McInsane.
That discouraged the base.
If they voted for the healthcare law, They’re in trouble and there’s no way around it. They know this.
It’s quite telling that the Dems aren’t looking to the current ‘leader’ of their party to steady their troops. Even they know that Obie’s a complete failure, and that he’s become totally radioactive.
You’ll never hear them admit it in public, but they all know it, and privately acknowledge the fact.
If Obie was even partially successful, he would have gently pulled both sides of the country towards some sort of middle ground. Instead, he’s deepened the divide in the country, and has done inestimable damage to those who are tied to his coat tails.
It’s a sign of complete desperation that they’re running back to their old daddy for reassurance.
Oh I agree, Bush could have kept his base.
I would sure like to know why he ignored them.
If Bush successfully blasted them on one issue, they pivot and turn to another...again and again and again.
Bush decided to put most of his energies into national security and speaking up for the forces. A President has only limited political capital and must decide what his priorities are.
This excerpt is pertinent:
"Use the "wifth" and/or "height" parameters to change the size of the picture you have linked to. For iinstance:
gives us the same image, but in a different scale: ...."
B) There's no sense in eliminating data
C) You may need a larger monitor.
I’m thinking double sided tape.
“Bill.....BILLLLLLLLL!!!! Put that freakin’ cigar away RIGHT NOW!!!! I don’t give a bloody rip if you are The Commander in Chief! NO DAMN CIGARS!!!!!”
THE RAPIST BILL CLUNTON (The L is silent.).......
That’s the way to introduce the scum.
A) Too much trouble.
When one is publishing (perhaps to tens of thousands), making the experience easy for them is the considerate thing to do. Or, is your 30 seconds of trouble worth more than the extra seconds of download time X thousands of potential viewers?
B) There’s no sense in eliminating data.
Not all of us needed nor wanted to have enough “data” to zoom into every one of her freckles (or other features).
C) You may need a larger monitor.
My monitor is large enough. Regardless, the amount of data transmitted would remain the same.
If you don’t care about the (potentially) thousands of your fellow Freepers — perhaps you might give a moment’s thought for the unnecessary burden your photo placed on FreeRebublic.com’s servers, and their costs for bandwidth.
When I posted the link to the HTML Sandbox, I assumed you were a well-intentioned poster, who could use the tech tips (I know they helped me). Apparently, I was wrong, about at least half of my assumption.
The Republicans do a much better job of bedwetting.
Do you really see the entitlement army voting R?
Bill has lost a lot of weight. Perhaps Bill is there symbolically to represent the slimming down of Democrats from Congress?
Clinton’s worth $100 million+. He didn’t get there by being stupid. Every Democrat dreams of the Big Corruption Score. Bill’s taking them to school.
You mean read my lips didn’t do Bush I in?
Perhaps he was channeling Willie Sutton?
Who counts the votes?