The catch is that Arms can be effectively eliminated through regulations. And the courts have ruled that the state has the right to Infringe on the right to bear arms by using regulations. Even though “Shall Not be Infringed” is pretty darn clear.
John Semens, your craptire is bilgePissWater compared to real news like this.
The Ninth??? Is this from The Onion?
From the 9th Circuit, will wonders never cease.
This is like a shot between the eyes to gun grabbers.
this came from the Ninth CIRCUS??? pigs must be flying someplace...I expect the Governor and AG of California to behave exactly as the Governor and AG of Maryland did when they were dealt the same hand by a Federal court ordering them to make some provision for concealed carry. They will simply say they will not abide by the ruling. A promise they kept, BTW.
On August 11, 1986, President Ronald Reagan nominated O’Scannlain to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated by Judge Robert Boochever. O’Scannlain was confirmed by the Senate on September 25, 1986, and received his commission on September 26, 1986.
On February 12, 2003, Callahan was nominated by President George W. Bush to serve on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Her Senate confirmation hearing was on May 7, 2003. On May 22, 2003, she was confirmed by a 99-0 vote.
Gonzalez, Irma Elsa
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on April 9, 1992, to a seat vacated by J. Lawrence Irving. Confirmed by the Senate on August 11, 1992, and received commission on August 12, 1992. Served as chief judge, 2005-2012. Assumed senior status on March 29, 2013. Service terminated on October 25, 2013, due to retirement.
The case was argued in Dec 2012.
The reason the liberals prate on public fear of gun violence to promote gun control has nothing to do with public safety and EVERYTHING to do with history and what is going on in places like Venezuela.
They fear that an armed populace, familiar with firearms, may one day decide they have had it with politicians stealing their healthcare, propagandizing their children, giving their country away to foreign invaders, ruining their economy, and taxing them to death.
Summary of US v. Stewart November 2003.
Now, seeing as how the hallmark of courts is rank inconsistency and use of brute force, the same court later ruled that machine guns are dangerous and unusual weapons' that are unprotected by the Second Amendment. US v. Henry, August 2012.
Of course, I'll take an honest ruling when I can get it, but I don't expect consistency or adherence to the law.
How frightening is it in this land of laws... that God-given rights are even questioned by some corruptable human being?
Celebrate if you wish... but there is not much that would have stopped the wrong outcome here.
That is beyond terrifying.
Yes, you can carry a microstamped pistol...
bttt
What planet are these people on?
The courts have routinely declared in language that is quite clear that the police have no duty whatsoever to any particular individual. The same has been ruled explicitly from the ninth circus as well if I recall correctly. You have no right to police protection, unless, of course, you're a judge, apparently.
FAUX NEWS ALERT...9TH CIRCUIT JUDGES KIDNAPPED, REPLACED WITH ACTUAL JURISTS
Meanwhile, everyone who wants to should open carry in California, without any permit.
This is huge...
And from the 9th Circus Court, no less... showing once again that every once in a while, even the dumbest ass liberal gets something right...