Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banks warned they risk prosecution if they follow Obama admin. guidance on marijuana
The Washington Times ^ | February 14, 2014 | Valerie Richardson

Posted on 02/15/2014 9:40:49 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

DENVER — Bankers should beware of the Obama administration’s newly issued green light for banks doing business with the legal marijuana industry, according to the head of the Colorado Bankers Association.

Memos released Friday by the Justice Department and Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network were intended to give banks leeway to open accounts for marijuana businesses in states like Colorado and Washington that have legalized retail pot. Instead, the guidance “only reinforces and reiterates that banks can be prosecuted for providing accounts to marijuana related businesses,” said the CBA in a Friday statement.

“In fact, it is even stronger than original guidance issued by the Department of Justice and the Treasury,” said CBA president and CEO Don Childears. “After a series of red lights, we expected this guidance to be a yellow one. This isn’t close to that. At best, this amounts to ‘serve these customers at your own risk’ and it emphasizes all of the risks. This light is red.”

Colorado’s first-ever legal marijuana market, which kicked off Jan. 1, has been hampered by a lack of access to bank accounts and small-business loans. Many of the state’s retail pot shops are cash-only enterprises, making them vulnerable to crime....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: colorado; federal; holder; illegal; inobamawetrust; legalpot; marijuana; obama; trustus; youcankeepitgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Surprising. Isn’t the goal of Democrats to have the entire country stoned so they can win elections forever?


21 posted on 02/16/2014 2:57:24 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boop

“This seems like “bait” for ANYONE who would have an all cash business.”

Reading this article, I keep hearing the famous words of Marion Barry...” B%#$h set me up!”


22 posted on 02/16/2014 3:26:43 AM PST by Artie (We are surrounded by MORONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: boop
Particularly with an "unfriendly" IRS.

An unhappy IRS versus legalized druglords with druglord tactics and druglord armies.

Happy thoughts...

23 posted on 02/16/2014 4:35:17 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No mater what he says, it’s still illegal. Perhaps we should say this about his health care edicts and enforce the law.


24 posted on 02/16/2014 5:32:26 AM PST by impactplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

the only banks that would have such regulations enforced on them will be those banks that get out if line

stay in line. do not question. obey.


25 posted on 02/16/2014 6:11:19 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

Yep, selective enforcement time.
Favored banks will have no problems.
Others, not so much.
Might get the same treatment the car dealers got.


26 posted on 02/16/2014 7:18:07 AM PST by Texas resident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I was making a general statement that given the correct circumstances, they would certainly suppress a story. I was not commenting upon this case. I should have made that clearer.


27 posted on 02/16/2014 9:44:35 AM PST by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
Boehner is clean as a whistle.

You may not like his policies, but Boehner will never be caught for immorality.

28 posted on 02/16/2014 12:33:43 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Where is it written that a business has to tell a bank what they sell? Under type of business, just say “marketing company” and be done with it. Any regulation obliging the banks to ask or to investigate the business accounts should be challenged. NOYB.

That of course is for checking and their business accounts. For loans and mortgages, I guess it would be different, as risk is involved and the information is relevent.


29 posted on 02/16/2014 1:43:59 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey

IBTFIOSBTMSM

In before the first “It’s only sex” by the mainstream media

Oh, wait...


30 posted on 02/16/2014 1:47:13 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson