Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, no, not again, Mitt Romney says: But supporters and pundits keep chatter of a 2016 run alive
Boston Globe ^ | February 15, 2014 | Matt Viser

Posted on 02/16/2014 8:11:17 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Ask Mitt Romney if he would run for president a third time, and he will deny it every which way.

“I’ve had my turn,” he told CNN.

“We’re so ready to watch the next person step up and take that nomination,” his wife told Fox News. “Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no,” Romney told The New York Times.

But in recent weeks, a strange thing has happened: Some supporters and donors, pollsters and pundits are starting to suggest — without irony — that the former Massachusetts governor run for president in 2016.

“Once a month, someone would e-mail or call and say he should run again,” said Ron Kaufman, a longtime Romney adviser. “Now I get it every day — from the grass roots, and from donors. I get it every day.”

Kaufman made clear that there was no behind-the-scenes maneuvering to persuade Romney to run again. A second Romney adviser said he was also approached frequently by former supporters and donors, asking him to persuade Romney to run again in 2016.

Those close to Romney say he is giving the talk little thought, and party operatives in key states and some of his former advisers say they cannot imagine a scenario in which he would run.

“He’s made it pretty clear he will strongly support whoever the 2016 nominee is,” Romney’s oldest son, Tagg, said in an e-mail to the Globe. “This isn’t something we are spending any time thinking about. Chatter is just chatter.”

And yet the former candidate who rarely gave interviews during the 2012 campaign and laid low for the year following his defeat is now suddenly everywhere.

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonglobe.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; mittromney; potus; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-111 next last

1 posted on 02/16/2014 8:11:18 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I agree with Mitt. ““Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no!”


2 posted on 02/16/2014 8:12:21 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Sodomy and abortion: the only constitutional rights cherished by Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh hell, don’t tell me this goober is seriously setting us up for another run.


3 posted on 02/16/2014 8:13:23 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!


4 posted on 02/16/2014 8:14:39 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

RE: Oh hell, don’t tell me this goober is seriously setting us up for another run.

He thinks he can be Richard Nixon in 1968.


5 posted on 02/16/2014 8:16:05 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because Adlai Sevenson was such a smashing success when he did it? And don’t forget WIlliam Jennings Bryan.


6 posted on 02/16/2014 8:16:17 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

7 posted on 02/16/2014 8:16:18 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“and yet suddenly he seems to be everywhere”. Yup he’s plannin’ sumtin.


8 posted on 02/16/2014 8:16:37 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My DNC friends tell me John Kerry is planning another run, so why not Mitt too?


9 posted on 02/16/2014 8:19:07 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He fought against republicans light years harder than he fought against Obama.
He runs again...
...idiots, all of them.


10 posted on 02/16/2014 8:19:35 PM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

this guy is like the clap’ and no antibiotics can cure it..


11 posted on 02/16/2014 8:22:44 PM PST by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Will it take a 3rd Romney loss for the GOP-E to get it through their fat heads that he simply does not satisfy our conservative needs?


12 posted on 02/16/2014 8:25:23 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
I agree with Mitt. ““Oh, no, no, no. No, no, no, no, no. No, no, no!”

In political-speak, that is meaningless.

13 posted on 02/16/2014 8:31:09 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: max americana

I respect Mitt Romney for being a decent guy. He’s apparently a good father, a shrewd businessman, and a kind man. Unfortunately, he’s also a product of his environment. I’m not sure he understands a thing about conservative philosophy. He’s a typical moderate Republican who apparently doesn’t realize what we’re dealing with on the left. When they say they want a fundamental transformation, they aren’t kidding (it’s similar to Iran saying they want to destroy the Great Satan...for three decades straight!).

So I’m perfectly happy to have Mitt Romney on our side so long as he’s fighting the left and not us (that’s what “on our side” means, although you wouldn’t know it from the likes of McCain and other moderates). If he wants to contribute money and campaign for Republicans, that’s great, but I hope he never, ever tries to run for president again.


14 posted on 02/16/2014 8:33:10 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Sodomy and abortion: the only constitutional rights cherished by Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He 0 for 3. That record sucks.


15 posted on 02/16/2014 8:33:36 PM PST by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I doubt that anybody who wasn’t willing to vote for him the first time will change their minds. I don’t personally believe most of those who declined to vote for him made that decision along rational lines, but that was their choice to make.


16 posted on 02/16/2014 8:35:08 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
With some necessary adjustments, Romney could be a potent candidate in 2016 for five reasons: (1) he has name ID and well-earned positive public image based on a belated public recognition that Romney is sincere and well-meaning in ways that Obama is not; (2) losing in one cycle is often a predicate for winning in the next cycle; (3) there is no other standout GOP choice for President; (4) Romney has the personal attributes of a good steward of the country's interests; and (5), in the general election, public disenchantment with Obama could be channeled into support for Romney as a way to make amends for the mistake the country made in reelecting Obama.

That said, Romney would need to make two crucial changes for 2016: (1) he would have to reach out to the Tea Party and conservatives on a personal and ideological level and seek to unify the GOP; and (2), he would have to develop and campaign for a conservative reform agenda that was sound in principle and poll tested to be politically attractive.

17 posted on 02/16/2014 8:39:20 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

We may get to choose between tow doses of the clap, McCain would like to try again.


18 posted on 02/16/2014 8:41:40 PM PST by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

One thing I think Romney would be very interested in, at least based on his past comments, is attacking the tax code to make it more tax payer friendly.

That would be a big win for conservatives, even if he did nothing else.


19 posted on 02/16/2014 8:42:36 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Bring back Alf Landon!


20 posted on 02/16/2014 8:43:24 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

21 posted on 02/16/2014 8:44:35 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He said he’s not running. The left needs to give it up.


22 posted on 02/16/2014 8:45:20 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (As government expands, liberty contracts. - President Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He may be disliked, but almost everything he said was going to happen if Obama was elected has. Right now he looks like ****ing Nostradamus.


23 posted on 02/16/2014 8:54:28 PM PST by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The guy has been running for office for 20 years and has a single victory to show for it.

He won that election with under 50% and had to give up running for reelection and left office with 34% approval, he ruined the 2008 election cycle, and then lost to Jimmy Carter the second when we were in a near depression.

He doesn’t even belong in republican politics.


24 posted on 02/16/2014 9:00:51 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Quite true. I was surprised in 2012 that Romney did not raise the tax simplification and reform issue, even if only as a way of pivoting off the attacks on his personal finances.


25 posted on 02/16/2014 9:19:56 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

You really need to be educated about the guy.


26 posted on 02/16/2014 9:22:06 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

for a guy who is supposedly not going to run again Willard sure does leave home and visit the national media to protest a lot...

seems like OCRA II is well under way...


27 posted on 02/16/2014 9:52:46 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Once a month, someone would e-mail or call and say he should run again,” said Ron Kaufman,
__________________________________________

yeah well even a liberal like Willard can learn to send EMail and use a phone...


28 posted on 02/16/2014 9:54:34 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Hell, maybe that’s what the magic underwear is for.


29 posted on 02/16/2014 9:59:30 PM PST by enduserindy (A painted trash can is still a trash can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

From the article:

The answers Romney has given more recently are more definitive than the ones he gave last year. He told CNN in June that he would “love” to run.

“I would do it again, but it’s not my time,” he said. “Ann might not . . . but I would love to do it again, are you kidding? I’d love to do it and win...”

______________________________________________

so in June 2013 Willard was yelling “Pick me !!! Pick me !!!”


30 posted on 02/16/2014 10:02:16 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I have no illusions about Romney, but he would be substantially better than any Democratic nominee. Moreover, Romney could be quite good if he were committed to a conservative reform agenda and had a Republican Congress with conservative fire eaters in charge. Romney’s genial manner and mild personality would do much to diminish and deflect opposition to reforms.


31 posted on 02/16/2014 10:49:33 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

It is silly to list people who would be better than a democrat nominee, and Romney can’t do anything conservative, Romney despises conservative and conservatism and has his entire life, that is what brought him into elective politics.

Romney is the most radical leftist in GOP history to be nominated, and after 20 years, doesn’t someone have to point out that the guy is a lousy political candidate?


32 posted on 02/16/2014 10:56:01 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What the heck is he doing all over the Sunday shows?


33 posted on 02/16/2014 11:03:31 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Romney is a liberal, have you not figured that out by now?

(I know—I worked on his one successful campaign for office.)

He’s also older than Hillary.


34 posted on 02/16/2014 11:12:06 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Exactly. The only thing Romney is not liberal about is keeping his own money.


35 posted on 02/16/2014 11:13:05 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

People don’t realize what his biography reveals about how anti-conservative his life has been, even to leaving the GOP and fund raising as a democrat because of Reagan and the 80s.


36 posted on 02/16/2014 11:24:19 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

This is being pushed by the leftist media. If nominated as the repub nominee, it would assure that Hillary would be elected pre__sent the second.

The repub voters that would not pull the lever for Mitt in 2012 will not pull the lever for him in 2016.


37 posted on 02/16/2014 11:25:41 PM PST by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Just how liberal do you think Romney is? Liberal like Nixon and Ford could be called liberals, or liberal like Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and Obama?

As for age, nature is unkind to women in that they visibly suffer its effects more than men. Romney looks distinguished while Hillary increasingly looks old.

38 posted on 02/16/2014 11:47:56 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Delta Dawn

They’re not dragging him into their studios against his will.


39 posted on 02/16/2014 11:48:36 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Women, however, live longer than men.

Romney is more liberal than many Democrats from less blue states than MA.


40 posted on 02/16/2014 11:50:08 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Yep. He’s probably out on the left with Jon Huntsman—but he was a far less effective governor.


41 posted on 02/16/2014 11:52:01 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Dean would probably be more fiscally conservative than Romney—and he was a better governor. He’s also better on Obamacare.


42 posted on 02/16/2014 11:53:21 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
Alan King, in his stand up act, used to do a funny routine in which he talked about how women had it better than men and even outlived them. "I can see that some of you men are doubting me," he would say, "So I'll prove it to you."

King would then ask if anyone in the audience had that day's newspaper, or any newspaper. On being given a paper, King would turn to the obituaries and start reading them out. The punch line would be that again and again, when a man died old, the obituary described that he was "survived by his widow."

To some degree at least, might Romney have been liberal because that was the price of being governor of Massachusetts? Careerist business types are often like that, putting on their politics like calibrating the right suit for a business occasion. If so, as to Romney, that means getting him pinned down to a conservative reformist platform that he commits to and campaigns on.

43 posted on 02/17/2014 1:08:55 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

That graphic: “If you think everything will be okay once obama is out of office ... you don’t understand the problem,” is RIGHT ON.


44 posted on 02/17/2014 1:17:21 AM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

He was out there the last couple of weeks for two reasons. One was for his opinion of the Olympics in Sochi, as he did such a great job with the Olympics when he came in and saved ours and actually ended up financially in the black. He also did a fine job with the safety aspects of the U.S. winter Olympics when he ran it, so they were questioning him about Sochi safety. The other reason was because the documentary movie “Mitt” was coming out, so he was around for PR purposes also. So relax folks, he wasn’t out there because he’s running again. Some people can’t take no for an answer.


45 posted on 02/17/2014 3:27:50 AM PST by flaglady47 (Proud Conservative Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“He’s also older than Hillary.”

Mitt sure looks a heck of a lot better. Hillary is a dog.


46 posted on 02/17/2014 3:34:38 AM PST by flaglady47 (Proud Conservative Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Blow your daddy’s money myth... NEVER AGAIN OLD BOY!


47 posted on 02/17/2014 3:52:44 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

SBVFT are still around and old lurch will not like it.


48 posted on 02/17/2014 3:54:27 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

No, he was a supporter of liberal Democrats before he ran for office and had to paddle vigorously to the right just to run as a GOP candidate in MA. Then, of course, as soon as he was in office he not only did absolutely nothing to support GOP candidates down-ticket from him—he governed as a liberal Democrat while in office.

He tried to enact a couple of rightish-leaning acts that never were even actually implemented before he stepped down in order to help him run as something of a Republican for president.

He was plotting to run for president back from when he first ran for office. He first ran against Teddy Kennedy in a race for which it wasn’t expected he’d win, only that he’d establish name recognition. But MA had a string of three Republicans governors before him, and not only did running against Kennedy give him a chance to have the support of his party, it enabled him to supposedly posture as a more credible eventual national candidate from MA. Then, he was able to run outwardly as a continuation of the string of GOP governors that went back to William Weld.

The dude was a liberal, soulless corpus of ambition through every step of his political (and business) career.

On the other side, he obviously has been a good and dedicated provider to his family and a model citizen within his Mormon community, within which he has done a number of good acts.


49 posted on 02/17/2014 4:25:42 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

You are reminding me in a quite cogent manner of why I had such misgivings about Romney in 2012. Who do you want in 2016? Or at least see as credible conservative candidates?


50 posted on 02/17/2014 6:43:36 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson