Skip to comments.Ex-Militants Who Admit Killing Cops Seek Parole (Black Liberation Army)
Posted on 02/17/2014 1:21:11 PM PST by Libloather
In their 2012 appearances before parole officials, both men admitted their roles in killing officers Joseph Piagentini and Waverly Jones, 33. The officers were shot multiple times after they'd responded to a report of a domestic dispute at a Harlem housing complex on May 21, 1971. Prosecutors said it was a trap set by Bell and Bottom.
"I began to see things in a way that I wanted to come clean," Bell said in 2012, according to a transcript. "I wanted to accept that fact that I committed this offense, I wanted to show remorse, but I didn't really know how to express that to the Board."
When pressed on why he'd maintained his innocence for so long, Bottom said, according to his transcript, "Who wants to acknowledge, who really wants to deal with the issues of killing another human being?"
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
How beautiful. Why haven't they been executed yet?
I imagine Holder will let them out. The commie ‘RATS are going to need all the voters they can get in 2014 and 2016.
It’s New York. There’s your answer.
Thou shalt not kill.
“When pressed on why he’d maintained his innocence for so long, Bottom said, according to his transcript, “Who wants to acknowledge, who really wants to deal with the issues of killing another human being?” “
Translation: I finally realized I wasn’t going to get off the hook, so now I’m sorry and stuff.
BTW, wasn’t there also a case in Chicago back in the 70s similar to this? IIRC, a couple of CPD officers were killed by a sniper at one of the projects. Can’t remember if it was a setup call or not - not that it matters to the slain officers, of course.
“Thou shalt not kill.”
You could at least get the Commandment right. It is “Thou shalt not do murder.” and you faux Christians always leave this one out: “He who sheds mans blood, by mans hands shall his blood be shed.”.
The DO”J” and Holder will hunt down and find
some innocent white whipping boys, girls, and
helpless women to beat up, rape, and murder, instead.
“”It is Thou shalt not do murder.””
In whose Bible?
Not executed yet? Simple, just some poor misunderstood PsOS.
I was always taught that the correct translation is “Thou shalt not murder”.
Faux, not so much, either way.
Self Defense is a continuum.
parole them to the scaffold.
Honest citizens had to pay for these two sociopaths to get college degrees? Can I assume they have a work out gyn, cable TV, and access to illegal drugs?
And the innocent children of the police officers? My guess is evil, stupid, corrupt liberals gave them NOTHING. NO marches, no tears, no ‘free college degree’...
A pox on their house...
If you don’t hate liberal elites and the filth they serve, you’re not paying attention...
Hang them first, then parole them but do NOT pardon them. That is what they deserve.
They have good jobs waiting for them in the Holder Justice Dept.
If your bible has it any other way than “Thou shalt not do murder”, you need a correct one.
If they are black and killed White cops, holder will let them out.
Waiting for their presidential pardon.
You’re wrong. See post 20.
I am correct. “murder” is not the same as “kill”.
You haven’t consulted the KJV. You apparently use a different version of the Bible but I wouldn’t rush to correct what others are using and have used for 70+ years.
King James Version (KJV)
13 Thou shalt not kill.
The KJV. I think I see the problem.
“”The KJV. I think I see the problem.””
You have an objection to the KJV and of course, the version you use is the CORRECT ONE?? How many years have you been using it?
The correct Hebrew translation is “murder”, not “kill”. See above. Old Jefe Jim didn’t have a lot of Hebrew speakers in his employ.
Keep in mind that the same CHAPTER where God says "Thou shalt not kill/murder", a little bit further on He says But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth; But thou shalt utterly destroy them;
So the Israelites were ordered to not kill fellow Israelites, but putting to the sword men, women, and children was OK as long as they were the enemy.
Thank you. King Jim didnt have any problem with killing, as long as he was the one doing it.
The Hebrew word that is translated as murder is ratsach. It means to murder. The old King James Version Bible used the old English and therefore it read as You shall not kill. The word kill in the old King James English meant to murder and the word to slay meant to kill.
Now that they’ve admitted it, some limo lib jackasses will pay for genetic book-cooking to get them fully exonerated. Thanks Libloather.
They were enemies of God and He knew their hearts, something that we can’t see.
Meanwhile, there's the list of crimes punishable by death in Leviticus, which would require regular humans to make a judgement about the hearts of the accused and whether they were to be judged guilty.
One witness is not enough to convict anyone accused of any crime or offense they may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.
[”I wanted to accept that fact that I committed this offense, I wanted to show remorse, but I didn’t really know how to express that to the Board.”]
Demand to be executed. If that doesn’t work hang yourself with a bed sheet.