None of those cases directly raises the next big legal issue in the national debate over guns: whether the right to keep a gun at home for self-defense extends to public places.
I'm in a public place, therefore my right to self defense is in a public place. I don't know by what idiocy anyone would think "...keep and bear arms..." in any way was restricted to just the domicile.
posted on 02/18/2014 9:53:13 PM PST
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
I don't know by what idiocy anyone would think "...keep and bear arms..." in any way was restricted to just the domicile.
Ask and ye shall receive:
posted on 02/18/2014 10:32:36 PM PST
(Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
“. I don’t know by what idiocy anyone would think “...keep and bear arms...” in any way was restricted to just the domicile.”
Or to personal protection for that matter. The right to
bear arms is there to keep the government in check. It’s
our personal right as an individual sovereign citizen that
gives us the right to protect our selves and our neighbors
rights, life and property. It’s our civic duty.
posted on 02/19/2014 6:11:53 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson