MiG-31: A fighter ahead of its time

Defence analysts believe that no other aircraft of its kind would be able to compete with what NATO calls the Foxhound in the next 10 to 15 years

Russian airspace is guarded by a unique aircraft, which can intercept any target, from hidden cruise missiles to satellites – day and night, rain or shine, and at any speed. Defence analysts believe that no other aircraft of its kind would be able to compete with the Russian MiG-31 in the next 10 to 15 years.

The two-seat supersonic fighter-interceptor, referred to as Foxhound by NATO, is the first Soviet combat aircraft of the fourth generation. In the late 1960s, there were two reasons to build this aircraft, internal and external. On the one hand, the US put strategic cruise missiles and the FB-111 bomber into service. These could fly over the North Pole and reach boundaries of the USSR at low altitudes, following the relief and avoiding coming into sight of our satellites. On the other hand, there was a gap in the radar barrier in the North of Russia.

In order to fill this gap and to meet any ‘uninvited guests,’ Moscow decided to launch an aircraft capable of monitoring air space over a wide front and altitude range. These aircraft were the new MiGs, built in the Artem Mikoyan Experimental Design Office (today the Russian Aircraft Corporation MiG). After their assignment to combat duty, American reconnaissance aircraft started to fly less frequently across the boundaries of the USSR.

Now, when the issue of protecting Russian interests in the Arctic region has become increasingly important, the MiG-31 “Arctic” experience can be of great service to the northern formations of the Russian Army. Military Read section: Defence and Security

The MiG-31 is capable of intercepting and destroying any target from low-flying satellites to cruise missiles. A group of interceptors can control a large portion of air space, by directing fighters to any target, as well as ground-based anti-aircraft missiles.

This aircraft was called the “flying radar” by the pilots, for its unique avionics capabilities. This complex has at its basis the ‘Barrier’ control system, equipped with the world’s first phased-array antenna. This PAA differs from the classic radar as it allows to move the beam at a fixed antenna, as well as to create the necessary number of rays, tracking multiple targets simultaneously.

The Barrier is able to detect 24 objects at a distance of 200 kilometres. The on-board computer chooses the four most dangerous targets and directs long-range air-to-air missiles at them. The other four targets (the maximum number of simultaneous targets that can be attacked is eight) are destroyed either by the medium-range and short-range missiles or their coordinates are transmitted to fighters and anti-aircraft missiles on the ground.

Experts say that in the next 10 to 15 years there will be no aviation system built that can match the MiG-31. All modern fighters (except for the fifth generation fighter aircraft) are not fully supersonic, since their supersonic flight time is limited to 5–15 minutes, due to various kinds of restrictions in the airframe design. Duration of the MiG-31 supersonic flight is only limited by the fuel supply. Moreover, the MiG-31 is able to pass the sound barrier in level flight and in climb mode, while the majority of supersonic aircraft pass the M=1 speed in a shallow dive.

Production of the MiG-31 began in 1981 at the Sokol plant in Gorky (now Nizhny Novgorod). By the end of 1994, more than 500 of these machines were built, and then their production was curtailed. Today about one hundred of these are operational.

The modernization of the MiG-31, launched in 1984, led to the creation of the MiG-31M. This is considered the best invention and creation in Soviet military aviation history, with some information about it still being considered confidential today. It is known that the MiG-31M, at the maximum speed, is faster than any similar aircraft in the world, by at least 500 kilometres per hour. In August 1995, the aircraft was shown at the MAKS-95 Air Show in Zhukovsky and caused a sensation. However, the MiG-31M did not go into serial production.

Nevertheless, at the Sokol plant and at aircraft repair plants, the production capacity, staffing and documentation necessary for the resumption of work still exist. Aviation professionals believe all these factors will reduce production costs for the restoration of so promising an aircraft by a third.

“it’s earlier variant scored a first kill in a Gulf War against USN F-18.”

Where did you get that? First, it were F-15’s that scored first kills, and secondly, most importantly, the Gulf War Air Power Survey (GWAPS) lists a MiG-25 as one of many possibilities for the loss of the jet. So, while you state as fact the loss was due to a MiG-25, there are no facts to support that allegation.

“It’s radar proved to be immune to countermeasures as well,”

“Immune?” Not hardly. It is am improvement over standard doppler notch tactics and such, but hardly immune from electronic jamming/spoofing. ALL electronic sensors can be jammed or spoofed. . .the MiG-31 is by far one of the easiest scanned-array radars to be jammed or spoofed.

“Iraqi Foxbats disrupted numerous Allied sorties at the time”

Where did you get that? A close study of the air war, and even a cursory examination, reveals no such disruption took place. . .especially after the first night. “Disruption” was most always the result of SAM activity and not the result of A/A activity. Again, GWAPS (the definitive fact-based report on the air war).

“A wing of F-111s or Tornadoes dropped their loads short of target and chased away by Foxbat is a mission kill. . .”

First, “mission kill” is not a term used by aviators, planners or weaponeers.

Second. . ."F-111 or Torandoes"? Yet you claim "mission kill" to MiG-25s?.

Third, unless you provide accurate facts and sources, you are just saying things. I provided an excellent academic source with facts, stats, interviews, ets. . .and what you are talking about never happened.

Some missions on the first and second night were terminated early (”aborted” is the correct term) but that was because they over-ran their OCA SEAD coverage.

Public forums are full of ‘experts’ offering snippets of brilliance from their superior minds when, actually, their ‘facts’ are about as trustworthy as Bill Clinton in a backwater Bayou Cat-house.

Caution is best used when reading about technical capabilities of anything, especially aircraft.

A ‘first engagement’ is far from accurate and I think they are referring to “may be among the first engagements.”

As far as how hard to intercept, not really hard at all. In fact, easy. Here is why: Huge RCS, sun-sized thermal plume, massive physical size so easy to see.

Once seen (by whatever means), you can run an intercept on the jet very easily because it simply can't change direction without making a turn that would take up the entire state of Kansas.

Basically, see it and put it on the CATA and it is toast. Just draw a little lead and pull the trigger. Easy.

I suspect your sources are simply ignorant about A/A and simple tactics and confuse speed with difficulty to intercept. It's either they are a) ignorant, b) trying to sound smart, c) engaged in disinformation, or d) in love with the target. . .errr. . .jet. . .and simply cant stand having others calling their baby ugly.

Cheers

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.