Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary’s Sugar Daddy Socialism Is Fair Game
Townhall.com ^ | February 24, 2014 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 02/24/2014 6:06:49 AM PST by Kaslin

It’s now officially sexist to hold someone accountable for her legacy of failure – as long as she is a liberal. Nonsense. Rand Paul was absolutely right to declare open season on Hillary’s track record of actively enabling Bubba’s grotesque satyrism.

Naturally, her mainstream media cover-up crew swung into action, decreeing that examining her record is verboten. It’s adorable how, in the age of the internet, these has-beens still think they get to decide what we can and can’t discuss. Give it another year or so until these dinosaur hacks are at the bottom of off-ramps with signs reading, “Will gatekeep for food.”

Hillary proves the old adage that a liberal feminist needs a man like a fish needs water. We just aren’t supposed to say that either.

Ah, the wonders of liberal feminism. What can’t it do – besides actually improve the lives of women who don’t manage to hook up with a powerful man who will hand them a career? Here’s the cold, hard truth: If Hillary hadn’t kept her part of the bargain with Bill Clinton by putting up with his serial abuse, she’d be just another grim liberal matron scowling at the thought that somewhere, out there, a man isn’t apologizing.

Liberal feminism was always about the liberalism, never about the female. Like every liberal pose, it is based upon a lie. Women, to liberal feminists like Hillary, are simply a means to an end. Hillary’s end was personal power, and all she had to do was destroy the occasional Paula Jones or Kathleen Willey if they protested being her hubby’s glorified sex toys.

We aren’t supposed to talk about how liberal feminism messed up our culture for women who aren’t married to a rich former presidents, and we aren’t supposed to mention that Hillary embodies liberal feminism better than almost anything except Ted Kennedy’s Oldsmobile.

Real feminism should be concerned with women having the same opportunities as men. But liberal feminism is only concerned with turning women into a perpetual left wing voting block. The left doesn’t woo them by promising to build a society without arbitrary discrimination where, with hard work, they can realize their ambitions. Instead, liberals promise to hook them up with Uncle Sam – he’s older and not so hot, but he’s got a lot of dough and will take care of all you helpless Julias!

That’s Hillary in a nutshell, the poster gal for Sugar Daddy Socialism.

Lisa De Pasquale of Townhall illustrates the collateral damage in her new book Finding Mr. Righteous. Lisa (a friend who shares my agent and publisher) writes about her life as a single women in modern America with agonizing honesty. As she goes from guy to guy, we see that women today have career opportunities but not the traditional structures that create opportunities for personal happiness.

But hey, ask liberal feminists, who needs traditional structures? Well, we do – something else we’re not supposed to say. Where is the social structure that protected and enabled women – and that gave purpose to men? In its place, as Lisa shows us, is a world of young people who spend an extraordinary amount of time alienated and alone. Much of her human interaction is actually electronic, even her intimate interaction. If Helen Reddy wrote her big hit today, it would be called “I Am Women, Hear Me Sext.”

Helen Smith’s Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream - and Why It Matters showed us the cultural forces – many of them spurred on by liberal feminists like Hillary – that incentivize males to remain man-children. The men in Lisa’s world (at least until the end of the book) seem largely beaten and weak, drained of confidence and ambition – in other words, they turned out exactly as feminists hoped. Lisa shows us how this impacts women. The gallant Knight in Shining Armor is now a patriarchal relic; here comes the broke Dude in Torn Cargo Shorts asking if his date can spot him $25 for dinner because his mom finally started making him pay rent.

And when they try to act like men, it’s often only a parody of masculinity that confuses the kind of seedy priapism exemplified by Bill Clinton with true manhood. After all, Hillary and her fellow feminist enablers gave such cheesy sexual aggression a big thumbs up, and Lisa demonstrates that young men were watching. There are no cigar antics, thankfully, but Lisa’s no-holds-barred peek into reality is quite terrifying. And I know terrifying – I watch Girls.

Maybe Lisa should have done what Hillary and her pal Wendy Davis did – latch onto a successful guy and had him create a career for her. It’s totally empowering.

No, we’re not supposed to comment on how Hillary has accomplished absolutely nothing by herself, except Benghazi.

Wanna see a liberal squirm? Ask him to name Hillary’s greatest success as Secretary of State. You’ll get: “Uh, she raised awareness of women’s issues around the world.” Apparently, until she dumped a zillion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere jetting around from “Reset” fiasco to Arab Spring disaster, the world was unaware of women.

As Secretary of State, foreign potentates understood her as a mere flunky. But if the American people elect this empty pantsuit president, how will they treat her? They know Bill used her like a doormat. They will too. Why would anyone have any respect for her – or fear of her?

You won’t hear that from the slobbering sycophants of solidarity in the mainstream media. After all, when it comes to protecting Hillary’s façade of accomplishment, it takes a takes a Potemkin Village.

Wait, can we say that?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; feminists; hillary; hillary2016; hillaryclinton; socialism

1 posted on 02/24/2014 6:06:49 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Were she to be elected President, we’d have another 4 years of someone who can’t be criticized. Anyone who disagrees with Obama is dismissed as a “racist”. Anyone who would disagree with a president Hillary would be “picking on the woman”.

We don’t need any more “protected minorities.”


2 posted on 02/24/2014 6:32:24 AM PST by pioneerstakethearrows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pioneerstakethearrows

If that psycho skank was president now, you wouldn’t be reading this.


3 posted on 02/24/2014 6:36:41 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
HRC accomplishments as SOS:

Fly somewhere. Eat and sleep. Board plane and fly somewhere. Repeat, repeat, repeat.

4 posted on 02/24/2014 6:52:56 AM PST by JPG (Yes We Can morphs into Make It Hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

Right you are.
BIG difference between Hillary and obozo.
Hillary is not lazy. She doesn’t play golf or take lots of long vacations. She would be dedicated to her task and wouldn’t “call it in”.

IMHO, she is much more dangerous than the existing psycho we have now. Add to that, she would have all the people in place.


5 posted on 02/24/2014 6:56:21 AM PST by Texas resident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

Hillary is a complete psychopath.

She not only enjoys the killing itself, she enjoys the thrill of having people know what she has done but being able to “outsmart” enough people to get away with it.


6 posted on 02/24/2014 7:05:37 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

Like Vince Foster?


7 posted on 02/24/2014 7:06:54 AM PST by Texas resident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

“Hillary is a complete psychopath.”

Why do so many people in the electorate lover her?

Just wondering.

IMHO


8 posted on 02/24/2014 7:11:33 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"...Hillary’s track record of actively enabling Bubba’s grotesque satyrism."

I'm in awe of this wordage. Srsly.

9 posted on 02/24/2014 7:44:00 AM PST by Albion Wilde (The less a man knows, the more certain he is that he knows it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Don’t let rove see this article. He gave orders that no one should say anything bad about Hillary. I’m still trying to figure out who gave him the authority to tell anyone what to do.


10 posted on 02/24/2014 7:49:28 AM PST by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPG

And take china if noboby is looking.


11 posted on 02/24/2014 7:58:52 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

Vince Foster’s job was to surround Clinton with people that needed the US Attorneys fired, just like Clinton need them fired, to cover up what was in some FBI files.

VF’s so called suicide note were he said “destroying peoples lives is considered sport” is a reference to Kimba Wood and Zoey Baird.

They were brought in, the Clintons then derailed their nominations blaming it on the republicans hating women, so Janet Reno could be brought in without opposition.

Reno needed the US Attorneys fired because she was involved in covering up police corruption.

Clinton, Reno, Christopher, Brown, Cisneros all need the US Attorneys fired.

The news media was too busy paying attention to the Clinton’s killing 80 people at Waco to pay any attention to the firing of the US Attorneys and the NON release of the review of 15,000 FBI files on police abuse and corruption.

VF started spilling his guts on the firing of the US Attorney’s then they found him belly up.


12 posted on 02/24/2014 7:59:45 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ripley

I don’t know.

My best guess is some people simply refuse to believe what is in front of their face.

We are seeing the same thing with Zippo.

People simply don’t want to believe he would intentionally destroy the US.


13 posted on 02/24/2014 8:04:13 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hillary and Obama are the biggest frauds since P.T. Barnum - though Barnum would have been a better president since he understood capitalism; Hillary and Obama don’t have a clue. All hot air and bravado that raises them up, but sinks America.


14 posted on 02/24/2014 12:13:38 PM PST by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPG

BINGO - The only noticeable thing she has done in representing our country is to get on and off airplanes and attend sumptuous banquets.


15 posted on 02/24/2014 1:24:56 PM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

Everything in Hillary’s history should be fair game if she runs. The media will try to hide it all, so it will take someone of courage to speak pout over and over. I doubt there are many (if any ) republicans with that courage.


16 posted on 02/24/2014 1:40:56 PM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Everything in Hillary's and Bills history should be fair game.

Besides the “war on women” and B. Clinton's long history of sexual harassment and rape, there is the Clintons history of racism.

BC got sued for both “racial profiling” because he didn't like “people of color” traveling through his state and “voter disenfranchisement” because he didn't like the way blacks voted.

There is absolutely no reason republicans should continue to sit back and let the Clinton's and the dems. make claims of “republican” racism” when it's a proven fact it's the Clintons that are the racist.

Time to shove it back in their face and never let up.

17 posted on 02/24/2014 4:54:06 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo hillary20urinal.jpg


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


18 posted on 02/24/2014 4:56:55 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

Remember though that Caliph Baraq is just the figurehead. While he’s out playing golf, ValJ is busting b@lls on Capitol Hill.


19 posted on 02/24/2014 5:03:01 PM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ripley
Why do so many people in the electorate love her?

Probably for the same reason young girls love Kim Kardashian -it isn't what they've actually done or look like, it's what they symbolize.

Hillary is the Great Unfulfilled Hope of Womanhood - no matter how old or ugly or incompetent, or downright mean she is in real life. Just as Obama was the Great Unfulfilled Hope of Blackness. Even attempting to run for office against them is racist, sexist, and just plain rude. :)

20 posted on 02/24/2014 5:07:39 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Crony capitalists to provide the campaign $$$
Feminists and entitlement army to provide the votes.

May be a tough combination to beat, sadly.


21 posted on 02/24/2014 5:09:41 PM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
[Art.] Ah, the wonders of liberal feminism. What can’t it do – besides actually improve the lives of women who don’t manage to hook up with a powerful man who will hand them a career?

I predict that someday, someone will find original documents in KGB archives showing that Betty Friedan, a young Communist when she was editing the in-house newspaper of the Electricians' Union (the biggest Communist labor union in the United States), invented the feminist movement as part of a grand sociological and identity-political strategy of the Soviet Union to divide American society politically and isolate and attack the white, married men who were its heart, guts, and backbone.

Make a pie chart of American Society in 2000. Color up the "minority" segment of the society. Not very big, is it, at 25%? Then take the big 75% chunk that is Caucasian and Christian ..... and cut it in two.

That's what "feminism" was: a strategy to alienate women from men, so that a riven society could be played like a fiddle by grandmasters of lying, deceit, and propaganda, using "assets" in the United States to move their agenda forward.

As for "identity politics", I'll bet Beastwoman has been paying royalties to KGB Active Measures since day one for that political apps package.

22 posted on 02/24/2014 5:20:59 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
I couldn't agree with you more. If I were running the RNC I'd be putting out talking points to hammer her into a pulp.

She was the one who took over White House operations and dumped the travel office staff which expanded to her trying to ruin Billy Dale's life and actually convict him of felony crimes to justify her firing.

She was the one who put Craig Livingstone, the bar bouncer from Atlanta in charge of security and then claimed she had no idea where he came from, even though he ran the entire operation.

She was the one that hired the dirty deeds squads to harass and intimidate witnesses being deposed regarding Bubba's sexual harassment escapades.

...and she was the one responsible for coming up with the idea to spin Benghazi off by blaming it on a YouTube video - I GUARANTEE IT!

23 posted on 02/24/2014 6:20:46 PM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Who hired the thugs that beat Gary Johnson in June 1992?

(He was Gennifer Flower’s neighbor who had security video tapes of Clinton entering and exiting from her apartment door, and who ended up in the hospital after handing over the tapes to men who appeared to be Arkansas state troopers).


24 posted on 02/24/2014 6:38:56 PM PST by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: research99

Jack Palladino was the guy who headed up the Clinton private detective corps.


25 posted on 02/24/2014 6:43:04 PM PST by nascarnation (I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: research99
From David Shippers' book, "SELL OUT"

[Kathleen]Willey discussed what to do with her lawyer and friend Daniel Gecker. He knew about the groping incident and warned her that anything she wrote would need to be completely innocuous, without the remotest suggestion of a backmail, extortion, or veiled threat or suggestion that she wanted a job in exchange for keeping quiet. Kathleen understood. To ensure that nothing she wrote could be misconstrued as a threat, Willey had Gecker review and approve the letters.

In 1994 Kathleen was invited to attend a World Summit in Copenhagen, and in 1995 she represented the United States at a biodiversity summit in Jakarta, Indonesia. She was totally unqualified for either position.

But bad things happened after Willey was subpoeaned to give a deposition in the Paula Jones case. This story was even more shocking than the President's alleged assault on a married woman.

On July 31, 1997, Gecker received, without warning, a fax from the office of the President's attorney. Both Willey and her attorney, who was present during our interview, confirmed to us that it was a document entitled "Statement of Kathleen Willey" and that it came with the instruction that she was to read it as a public statement. It said: "The President of the United States never sexually harassed me in any way, and I have always considered myself to be on excellent terms with him." She ignored the request.

In August 1997 the groping incident was reported in the Drudge Report and Newsweek. Around this time she received a phone call from an acquaintance who was a major financial donor to President Clinton. He told her to avoid giving a deposition if she was subpoenaed in the Jones case and to deny that anything had ever happened because only two people knew and "all you have to do is deny it, too."

Willey was subpoenaed in the fall of 1997 but wasn't actually called to testify until January 10, 1998. Shortly after she received the subpoena, Gecker was visited by one of the President's lawyers. Gecker told Kathleen the gist of the meeting: Clinton's lawyer was suggesting she avoid testifying by taking he Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Gecker told Clinton's attorney that his client wouldn't take the Fifth because she had done nothing wrong.

A short time after that initial meeting, Gecker told us, he received an unsolicited package from the President's lawyers. It contained a form affidavit, a form motion to quash the deposition subpoena, and a memorandum of law in support of the motion to quash.

A short while before Willey was scheduled to testify, Gecker received another visit from the same lawyer. This time Gecker was told that he was only "a real estate lawyer" and that Kathleen Willey should really be represented by a top criminal attorney. Gecker responded that he was perfectly capable of handling a deposition and that he could not see any possible reason that Kathleen needed a criminal lawyer. Gecker added that even if she wanted such a lawyer, Willey was broke and could not afford the fees charged by top Washington criminal lawyers. The President's attorney offered that she wouldn't need to worry about fees because "we will take care of that."

After that conversation, Gecker reported, he received a call from one of the best criminal lawyers in Washington about representing Kathleen Willey. When Gecker again mentioned that she had no money, the lawyer replied that there would be no fees to pay.

Gecker conveyed this to Willey. She was frightened and convinced that if she testified she would be indicted by Janet Reno's Justice Department. She had seen how Billy Dale of the White House Travel Office had actually been indicted and tried for crimes he had not committed, reportedly because he had gotten in the way of the Clinton administration. She had seen the smears and attacks on Paula Jones. To add to her fears, she felt intimidated by events that followed.

Shortly before her January 10 deposition, Willey came out of her Virginia home to find all of her tires flat. Her mechanic asked, "Who the hell did you tick off? Your tires were flattened with a nail gun."

In another incident, a man called -- supposedly from the local electric company -- saying her electricity would be turned off that evening so they could run some tests. Later that afternoon, she called the electric company to find out how long the tests would last. She was told there was no plan to interrupt service and no record of anyone calling her.

Kathleen lives in a semirural area. The anonymous caller was reminding her that she was vulnerable and alone.

As the deposition of Kathleen Willey got closer, the intimidation increased. One day her cat, Bullseye, disappeared. On January 8, two days before she was to testify, Willey was walking her dogs in a secluded area early in the morning. A man in a jogging suit approached her.

JOGGER: Good morning, did you ever find your cat?

WILLEY: No, we haven't found her yet.

JOGGER: That's too bad. Bullseye was his name, wasn't it? [This shocks Willey, because she has not revealed the cat's name to anyone.]

JOGGER: Did you ever get those tires fixed?

WILLEY: They're fine [Kathleen starts to edge away and look around for help.]

JOGGER: So,---and---[Willey's children's first names]? [Kathleen walks faster toward her house.]

JOGGER: And our attorney, Dan, is he okay?

WILLEY: He's fine

JOGGER: I hope you're getting the message.

Willey was terrified. She turned and ran. The jogger called after her, "You're just not getting the message, are you?"

As a result of that meeting, Kathleen feared that she, her children, and her lawyer were at risk of physical harm. She told Gecker about the jogger but didn't mention the not-too-veiled threat against Gecker himself. As she put it, "He was my only hope--I didn't want to lose him." Willey confessed that even during the deposition she was contemplating whether to lie or to tell the truth and possibly suffer terrible consequences.

The deposition began as scheduled. However, before the questioning began, the President's lawyer said, "You know, I've talked to the President, and he just thinks the world of you. You don't really think this was sexual harassment. It wasn't unwelcome, was it."

"Not only was it unwelcome, it was unexpected."

In the room during the deposition were the court reporter, the Jones attorneys, the President's attorney, Daniel Gecker, Kathleen Willey, and the presiding judge.

Gecker saw that Willey was nervous. When the Jones attorneys asked about the incident in the Oval Office, she looked terrified. Gecker asked for a short recess to consult with his client. He took Kathleen aside and told her they were about to go into the heart of the subject.

"Kathleen, there is no turning back, what are you going to do."

"I'm going to tell the truth, the whole truth," she answered, with tears in her eyes. She went back and answered every question put to her.

The next morning, Willey stepped outside to pick up the newspaper. There on the porch, within a few feet of the front door, the skull of a small animal lay facing her.

I asked Willey if she would be willing to testify. As she looked at Gecker, I could see real fear in her eyes. He said it was up to her.

I confessed that we couldn't vouch for the tactics of the President's lawyers, but we would not embarrass her.

Okay, if I'm subpoenaed, I'll testify."

26 posted on 02/24/2014 7:02:28 PM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Waco was also Hillary’s operation and it was Hillary that decided when the bombing in Kosovo would start.

You are right about Benghazi.

Hillary came up with the “spontaneous” lie. It’s a repeat of what was done before.

In January of 2006 the ACLU, with the help of al Jazeera and Osama bin Laden putting out a tape, tried to concoct a version of the “spontaneous” lie to explain away an al Qaida document recovered in Afghanistan, and a “coincidence” with the terrorist attacks.

In the doc OBL says the media is 90% of the PREPARATION for the battle.

Since the 1st WTC bombing, prior to each and every terrorist attack, attempted attack, or threat of an attack the left will always gin up civil unrest, attempt to gin up civil unrest, or have a plan to gin up civil unrest. In almost every case the left gins up the civil unrest by dragging up the R King case.

That is where the protest over a video leading to the attack came from. To try and create an explanation as to why terrorist attacks always follow when the left gins up civil unrest by comparing something to the R King case.

The “spontaneous” lie, and it’s several versions, was concocted to try and convince people the terrorist are simply picking up on a news story and “spontaneously” planning an attack around the news story and the left in this country aren’t orchestrating the news as part of the preparations for the attack.

In 2006 when the first attempt at the “spontaneous” lie was concocted, the ACLU had passed out video cameras in St Louise to try and recreate the R King video of 1991.

Amazingly it was 1991 when the planning for the 1st WTC bombing started.


27 posted on 02/24/2014 7:17:27 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
"The “spontaneous” lie, and it’s several versions, was concocted to try and convince people the terrorist are simply picking up on a news story and “spontaneously” planning an attack around the news story and the left in this country aren’t orchestrating the news as part of the preparations for the attack."

This is also why there has been no movement on a thorough investigation, or and attempt to bring any of the murderers to justice. If anyone involved were asked to describe the video or what offended them in it, they would have no idea what the question meant and Hillary would be proven a liar once again along with Obama, Rice and all their talking head allies in the media.

28 posted on 02/24/2014 10:09:31 PM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

The reason Zippo and company kept repeating over and over that the video protest caused the attack is nothing more than a cheap attorney’s trick that is commonly used on juries to manipulate their thinking.

It’s called “conditioned response”.

During a trial an attorney will make an obviously false or misleading statement and repeat the same thing to the jury over and over never expecting the jury to believe it, instead the attorney wants the jury to know it isn’t true and come to their own conclusion what the truth is ultimately leading the jury to a false conclusion.

In this case they repeated over and over the video protest caused the attack so the American people, which would be the jury, would come to the conclusion THERE WAS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN THE VIDEO PROTEST AND THE ATTACK.

The truth is the attack was planned THEN the protest in Egypt was planned for the purpose of CREATING the spontaneous lie.

Stevens and company were never supposed to be killed they were supposed to be taken hostage just like what happened during Carters term.

With the “media” being 90% of the preparation for the battle, just look for an orchestrated news story that fits with the “hostage” story.

The orchestrated news story is simple.

Immediately prior to the attack the dems. praised Jimmy Carter at their convention.

The republicans obviously compared Zippo to Jimmy Carter.

Hillary’s plan was simple. She was going to recreate the “October Surprise”.

They planned the attack, where Stevens and company were supposed to be taken hostage.

Then they planned the protest in Egypt to create the “spontaneous’ lie that the attack was because of the video.

Nobody was ever supposed to believe the “spontaneous” lie, instead Hillary’s rumor mill would start a campaign that Mitt Romney and the republicans had collaborated with the terrorist to make Zippo look like Jimmy Carter.

The republicans would then be put in the position to come up with some acceptable story for the American people to counter Hillary’s rumor mill that repubs had collaborated with terrorist and planned the attack.

They couldn’t tell the truth that it was Hillary collaborating with terrorist and planned the attack because they would end up sounding like Hillary’s rumor mill nuts.

The story the repubs were supposed to come up with

The terrorist are so in tune with the news the terrorist are simply picking up on news stories, in this case dems praising Jimmy Carter, and planning an attack around the news story in a relatively short period of time.

It would be the republicans that came up with the explanation as to why a terrorist attack always follows when the dems. drag out R King and gin up civil unrest.

The main reason for needing to create an explanation for the terrorist following the dems talking points is the attempted car bomb in NYC in 2010.

The dems had started a talking points campaign, which was also echoed by the MSM, that the TEA Party were a bunch of ultra violent, right wing extremist, racist, Tim McVeigh wannabes out to overthrow the govt.

Not too long after the dems started there talking points campaign against the TEA Party there was the attempted car bombing in NYC.

The bomb was a fertilizer bomb like Tim McVeigh used, so the left all jumped with joy and proclaimed their talking points about the TEA Party being a bunch of Tim McVeigh wannabes was correct.

There is 4 possibilities

1. The dems orchestrated the talking points/news for the attack to blame the TEA Party for the attack.

2. The terrorist are so in tune with the news they picked up on the dems talking points in the news and planned the attack accordingly.

3. The TEA Party actually did it.

4. It all one giant coincidence the terrorist matched the dems talking points in planning the attack.

Had Benghazi gone as planned, the republicans would have ended up explaining it away for the dems with choice #2.

Making the claim the terrorist are simply picking up on the news and in a relatively short period of time planning an attack.

Hillary’s rumor mill would stick with choice #3, the TEA Party collaborated with the terrorist and did it.

Benghazi is nothing more complicated than a 2bit attorneys strategy at CYA that she is collaborating with terrorist to kill Americans as her path to power.


29 posted on 02/25/2014 4:53:23 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
I wouldn't bet against that scenario. Hilary was always the brains behind concocting elaborate political strategies.

Above it all the truth remains that when Hilary diverted the plane bringing the bodies back from Benghazi for her photo op media event at Andrews AFB, she looked the parents of the slain Americans in the eye and told them they would put their full effort into prosecuting the video maker. In other words, she pledged to violate his constitutional rights to promote her scam.

30 posted on 02/25/2014 7:57:20 AM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

I don’t believe Zippo was ever supposed to be reelected until Benghazi made it necessary for him to be reelected to orchestrate the cover up.

Just look at a the “failures by design” orchestrated by the Obama adm that were all supposed to take place after January 2013.

Phony jobs numbers, Trayvon Martin case, Red Line in the Sand with Syria, Obamacare, Feds pumping money to prop up the stock market.

Once the phony jobs numbers was corrected it would be Romney’s fault unemployment was going up.

G Zimmerman was found not guilty and the DOJ didn’t purse the civil rights case because of republican racism.

Red Line in Syria, Obama said it himself, it wasn’t his credibility on the line it was the credibility of the US. True statement had Obama not been reelected.

Obamacar, if Romney got it repealed republicans wanted to deny you healthcare. Don’t repeal it and republicans had sabotaged it’s implementation.

Romney appoint someone to the Fed and stop pumping money into the market, market goes down. Continue pumping money and you get inflation.

As a one term president, forced out by republican dirty tricks, Obama would be seen as a martyr.

Two terms and he is seen as a complete failure and should have never been elected to begin with.

There is no way Hillary or anyone else can ride Obama’s coattails into the WH with “Continuing the Obama legacy”.


31 posted on 02/25/2014 8:33:06 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
I wouldn't bet against that scenario. Hilary was always the brains behind concocting elaborate political strategies.

Above it all the truth remains that when Hilary diverted the plane bringing the bodies back from Benghazi for her photo op media event at Andrews AFB, she looked the parents of the slain Americans in the eye and told them they would put their full effort into prosecuting the video maker. In other words, she pledged to violate his constitutional rights to promote her scam.

32 posted on 02/25/2014 9:21:58 AM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

I got a double post by accident, but wanted to say that every stinking unethical billing record and manipulation of evidence Hillary was involved at the Rose Law Firm should be looked into just as deeply as Romney’s time at Bain or Paula Dean allegedly using a racial term 30 years ago.


33 posted on 02/25/2014 9:25:14 AM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Agreed. Everything and I mean everything should be thrown out.

Do exactly what Hillary and the left do.

Throw the accusations out, 1 or 2 new ones a day, every day, and let Hillary prove they aren’t true.

No matter what the Clintonites say, ignore it and just keep repeating the same accusations over and over again.

Get people sick and tired of hearing about Clinton scandals until they don’t want to risk hearing about more Clinton scandals every day for the next 4-8 years.


34 posted on 02/25/2014 11:53:19 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
"Get people sick and tired of hearing about Clinton scandals until they don’t want to risk hearing about more Clinton scandals every day for the next 4-8 years."

Great game plan. Make them stand and explain over and over and over again; just like the libs do. ASk the same question four or five times, keep saying, "Let's put this to rest" - then read the statement that made a while back and ask them to explain it again. Tim Russert used that tactic to perfection against republican candidates.

35 posted on 02/25/2014 12:34:35 PM PST by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Another one would be to keep talking about the Clintons “Third Way” campaign and how the “Third Way” means Nazism/Fascism.

Communism on the left, Capitalism on the right, Third Way Nazism/Fascism in the middle.


36 posted on 02/25/2014 12:39:37 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson