Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon budget slashes benefits
The Hill ^ | 2/24/14 | Kristina Wong

Posted on 02/24/2014 3:43:55 PM PST by Libloather

Benefits for active ­duty personnel and their families would be slashed under a budget proposal released Monday by the Pentagon.

The budget would dramatically reduce the Army’s size and trigger a new round of controversial base closures, while cutting healthcare co-pays and deductibles and reducing the subsidies military families get for housing and low-cost goods.

Defense Sec. Chuck Hagel acknowledged the cuts would be controversial, but argued they were unavoidable in a belt-tightening era following the end of wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

“Congress has taken some important steps in recent years to control the growth in compensation spending, but we must do more,” he said.

Lawmakers and groups that represent veterans and the military charged the Pentagon with balancing its pocketbook on the backs of soldiers and their families.

“We know the Defense Department must make difficult budget decisions, but these cuts would hit service members, making it harder for them and their families to make ends meet,” said Paul Rieckhoff, the founder and CEO or Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA).

Coupled with a 1 percent ceiling on pay hikes and assuming a 5 percent annual hike in housing costs, the Military Officers Association of America estimated an army sergeant with a family of four would see an annual loss of $1,400. An Army captain would lose $2,100, it said.

The group said that doesn’t calculate other costs that would hit military families, such as increased prices at military commissaries because of another budget proposal, and an increase in healthcare fees for military family members.

Hagel cast the cuts as unavoidable, and necessary to avoid steeper cuts to military personnel.

He said payroll costs have risen 40 percent more than growth in the private sector.

While he said those hikes were the “right thing to do” during war, “today DoD faces a vastly different fiscal situation…We must now consider fair and responsible adjustments to our overall military compensation package.”

“This is the first time in 13 years we will be presenting a budget to the Congress of the United States that's not a war-footing budget,” Hagel said.

The budget includes proposals to cut the growth of housing allowances for troops and their families, and to stop reimbursing renter’s insurance entirely. Subsidies at domestic military commissaries that provide military families with low­-cost goods would be reduced.

Only the medically retired would escape proposed cuts to healthcare co­-pays and increases to deductibles.

While basic pay raises will be held to 1 percent in 2015 under the budget, general and flag officers would see a pay freeze.

The budget also calls for a new round of military base closings in 2017, which lawmakers have fiercely resisted during the past two budget requests.

Over the next five years, the Pentagon plans to reduce the size of the active duty Army from 520,000 to between 440,000 and 450,000. The Army National Guard would also be reduced from 355,000 to about 335,000, and the Army Reserve would be cut from 205,000 to 195,000. The Marine Corps would also shrink, from about 190,000 to 182,000.

The call for a smaller military represents a turn from a decade of ground wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, when Army troop levels peaked at 570,000 active troops.

Hagel acknowledged “some added risk” in having a small ground force, but said ground troops would still be able to defeat in enemy in one theater, and defend the homeland and support air and naval forces in another.

The Pentagon also proposed cuts to programs not geared toward future wars.

It would eliminate the Air Force’s A-10 “Warthog” attack jets, which provide ground troops with close air support. That would save $3.5 billion over five years, Hagel said.

It would retire the Air Force’s entire fleet of U­2 manned spy planes, and replace them with unmanned Global Hawk aircraft.

The budget cuts the number of Navy littoral combat ships from 52 to 32.

The elimination of the A-10 will be particularly controversial with lawmakers.

Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) called it a “serious mistake” that would cost lives, and warned she should fight it.

By making the cuts, the Pentagon is protecting investments in special operations, cyber resources, and the next-generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

It will also invest $26 billion in what officials are calling an “Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiative” that would be used for modernization.

Officials said more details about the fund would be released by the White House on March 4, when the administration releases the 2015 budget request.

Although the 2015 budget falls within the $496 billion budget cap imposed by Congress, the Pentagon’s budget plan for the next five years would exceed those ceilings by $115 billion.

Unless those ceilings are raised, Pentagon officials said deeper cuts will be made, including reducing the Army’s active duty size to 420,000 troops.

“Sequestration requires cuts so deep, so quickly, that we cannot shrink the size of our military fast enough,” Hagel said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benefits; budget; military; pentagon
Hagel: Dominance of US military ‘can no longer be taken for granted’
1 posted on 02/24/2014 3:43:55 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Liberalism and anti-Americanism continues. The Congress ignores while America burns.


2 posted on 02/24/2014 3:46:52 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The rat bastards. I hate these guys.


3 posted on 02/24/2014 3:48:02 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

time to start arresting the traitors in DC


4 posted on 02/24/2014 3:50:33 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Hagel: Dominance of US military "can no longer be taken for granted"

Translation: Dominance of US military "will no longer be tolerated" (by the Obama regime)

It's time ALL Americans understand that IS what they're saying

5 posted on 02/24/2014 3:52:08 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; All
Obama Defense Cuts photo ObamaDefenseCuts.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


6 posted on 02/24/2014 3:53:47 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

This ba$tard is a so called republican, may he burn in hell.


7 posted on 02/24/2014 3:54:54 PM PST by anoldafvet (If you think the government is capable of taking care of you, just look at the indian tribes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The plans have the endorsement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Whoa! That makes me feel so much better. What more could you ask for than the endorsement of five political hacks and sycophants? I mean, is that not the best recommendation one could ask for - five guys who have demonstrated their ability to put advancement over country?


8 posted on 02/24/2014 3:55:13 PM PST by Rodentking (There is no God but Yahweh and Moses is his prophet - http://www.airpower.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The fighter mafia finally gets rid of the A-10.

Bastards.

/johnny

9 posted on 02/24/2014 3:58:15 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Obama will never fully trust the military to side with him against American citizens. So is this a move to weaken the military to make room and money avaiable for Obama's Private Army?

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the
national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian
national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as
well-funded."

-- Barack Hussein Obama


10 posted on 02/24/2014 4:03:40 PM PST by Iron Munro (Eight died on that bridge at Concord, back in 1775. How many will it take this time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“It would eliminate the Air Force’s A-10 “Warthog” attack jets, which provide ground troops with close air support. That would save $3.5 billion over five years, Hagel said.”

I don’t claim to be an expert, but I have to think that a rugged, low-cost to operate and maintain attack craft that can carry a lot of goodies under its wings still has some uses. If anything, I’d modernize ‘em (glass cockpit, all-weather capability) not retire them.


11 posted on 02/24/2014 4:04:06 PM PST by DemforBush (A Repo Man is *always* intense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“It will also invest $26 billion in what officials are calling an “Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiative” that would be used for modernization.”

What would that be more “Muslim Outreach” like with the space program?


12 posted on 02/24/2014 4:04:37 PM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

These people don’t vote for Democrats. You can’t expect them to be treated like illegal immigrants or Obamaphone holders.


13 posted on 02/24/2014 4:06:20 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
Hagel: Dominance of US military "can no longer be taken for granted"

"But it is still possible
So let us weaken it, cut it down in size and reduce its capability.
That way we can be sure."


14 posted on 02/24/2014 4:08:22 PM PST by Iron Munro (Eight died on that bridge at Concord, back in 1775. How many will it take this time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
He said payroll costs have risen 40 percent more than growth in the private sector.

Are you freakin' kidding me?? Even with those raises the avarage military guy still earns way less than any civilian counterpart.

15 posted on 02/24/2014 4:09:13 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Cut somewhere else, Knucklehead. These people are too valuable to US interests. Cut the EPA, Dept. of Agriculture, Energy, and/or Education.


16 posted on 02/24/2014 4:09:20 PM PST by jch10 (John Beohner has got to be removed from the Speaker position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
“It would eliminate the Air Force’s A-10 “Warthog” attack jets, which provide ground troops with close air support. That would save $3.5 billion over five years, Hagel said.”

Close air support is the game changer in a ground war.
Obama wants to eliminate close air support for US ground forces to reduce our ability to project power on the ground.


17 posted on 02/24/2014 4:13:37 PM PST by Iron Munro (Eight died on that bridge at Concord, back in 1775. How many will it take this time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
He said payroll costs have risen 40 percent more than growth in the private sector.

That's because Obama has done his best to kill growth in the private sector in the last 5 years.

Let's compare it to growth in welfare, food stamps, etc.


18 posted on 02/24/2014 4:16:30 PM PST by Iron Munro (Eight died on that bridge at Concord, back in 1775. How many will it take this time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Active duty Army will be 420,000?

That’s a round off error in the People’s Liberation Army.

If they decide to pick a fight, means we go nuclear on Day 1.


19 posted on 02/24/2014 4:25:57 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
That would save $3.5 billion over five years, Hagel said

Might have something with driving Fairchild Republic out of business.

And having to give Boeing billions to do the wing update.

Republic would have been able to do it on a sustaining engineering contract...but no, they hadda be dumped.

Costs you know. Gotta pay more billons for the children of illegals.

20 posted on 02/24/2014 4:28:15 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rodentking

You nailed it, the JCS are simply yes men and will do whatever Dear Leader tells them to do.


21 posted on 02/24/2014 4:43:28 PM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

> Even with those raises the avarage military guy still earns way less than any civilian counterpart.

Toss in clothing allowance, hazard pay, housing allowance, reup bonuses, etc. They don’t do all that bad.


22 posted on 02/24/2014 4:48:11 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; Jet Jaguar; 2ndDivisionVet
That THAT you military families!

But hey! Gotta feed the "GimmeDatFreeStuff" Army!


23 posted on 02/24/2014 4:49:45 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




This is the last week of month two.

Keep Free Republic Alive with YOUR Donations!

Make a difference.

PLEASE Contribute Today!

24 posted on 02/24/2014 4:53:03 PM PST by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Seems to me the republic would be better served left to the Marines once again. My squadron Vmfat-201 in the early 70’s had 33 phantoms, the largest Phantom squadron ever in existence. Give me 4000 F4j’s or F16’s and Marine pilots will rule the day once again. We might even see some Generals flying again, make it personal. The air force Gay brigade isn’t cutting it, prove me wrong af personnel, take back your reputation.


25 posted on 02/24/2014 4:58:47 PM PST by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
This is disgusting. What about all of the employees who work for private contractors? It seems like mercenaries working for corporations are replacing military members whose loyalty is to the US.

Is that a good idea?

26 posted on 02/24/2014 5:01:58 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The Obamatrons wouldn’t be slashing veterans benefits and military pay to actually discourage enrollments.... would they?


27 posted on 02/24/2014 5:50:42 PM PST by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty ping.


28 posted on 02/24/2014 7:59:02 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

coup


29 posted on 02/24/2014 8:03:35 PM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
FTA:"We must now consider fair and responsible adjustments to our overall military welfare and "entitlements" compensation package."

To Hagel and the POS in the WH: There, fixed it for you, you piece of human detritus...

30 posted on 02/24/2014 8:34:25 PM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodentking
we could have voted for Romney....but no....he wasn't pure.....so we had people,freepers voting the bastard back in....thx for nothing.....

as far as the Joint chiefs, if we stopped giving pensions to military we would not have these arrogant perfumed princes in there....the pension is the dangling carrot and it keeps many unqualified people in the service when they should have gotten out long ago.....

I do not trust the military one iota...not with leaders like these...

31 posted on 02/24/2014 8:48:46 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
study after study has shown that military actually make more than their civilian counterparts....not to mention the immediate 4 weeks of vacation, the bx,px, commissary and all the base facilities at huge discounts, and the housing allowance that often lets military people buy many houses and flip them.....

there's lots of reasons to hate the bammey boy and his ring of traitors, and these devastating cuts to our military...but the military along with all of govt service has gotten pretty bloated with excess....

32 posted on 02/24/2014 8:53:26 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I hope people would be discouraged from joining....I wish all the good solid young men and women out there would not enlist at all.....why should we give up our best sons and dtrs to these meglomaniac nazi's????

I'm sure the plan will be to ultimately have a draft...you know, go after the solid citizens to be fodder for the dictators whims...

33 posted on 02/24/2014 8:57:28 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
At least we have Paul Ryan and company on our side!</sarc>
34 posted on 02/25/2014 3:39:33 AM PST by Gamecock (Grace is not opposed to human activity. It's opposed to human merit. MSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Only the medically retired would escape proposed cuts to healthcare co­-pays and increases to deductibles.

Didn't we JUST go through almost the exact same thing and then the pols fell all over themselves trying to undo the damage?

Do they realize that after THAT experience, Congress isn't going to touch this with a ten foot pole?

35 posted on 02/25/2014 4:09:44 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry
Cite a few of those studies please. I'm going to bet up front that more than a few have "equivalent compensation" factored in.

I remember living hand to mouth until E-4 and my wife was working too.

If you include full medical coverage compensation, poll a few other freepers about the quality of military medicine especially for their dependents. BTW, I personally have no gripes in that area but I have heard plenty.

If you include on-base quarters remember that many Wherry units were declared "substandard" and were open to lower enlisted grades (usually E-4 and up) for less than full BAQ.

And yes, that $25 monthly clothing allowance always made up for the stained and damaged fatigues I got from hydraulic leaks and battery acid splashes. Fortunately my wife could sew up the punctures and rips that safety wires and other pesky object could cause.

The commissary was an asset for sure, the BX was laughable.

I was fortunate to be in an AFSC that had a re-enlistment bonus. Most don't. The Bonuses were designed to keep top skills and to compensate for inordinately dangerous duty. Some have civilian equivalent like EOD, running into fires and guarding malls against suicide bombers.

And finally, that four weeks of vacation. Given the accounting system for leave, the first day and last day of a leave were counted as whole days and weekends/holidays were also counted as leave days. So, that 4 weeks (implied 30 days) you so thoughtfully cited really amounted to something more like 22 days. Still not a bad deal except you actually had to get authorization to take it from you commander. Our commander had a generous policy (because of our mission) and granted 5 day increments based on mission needs.

Oh yes, you forgot another leave benefit: 30 days convalescent leave if wounded and 30 days survivor leave if repatriated after being a POW. What is the civilian equivalent of that huge benefit??

36 posted on 02/25/2014 9:53:07 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson