Skip to comments.US planning full Afghan pullout, Obama tells Karzai
Posted on 02/26/2014 2:06:43 AM PST by Timber Rattler
President Barack Obama has warned his Afghan counterpart Hamid Karzai that the US may pull all of its troops out of his country by the year's end.
Mr Obama conveyed the message in a phone call to Mr Karzai, who has refused to sign a security agreement.
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...
I’m tired of our tax dollars going to Muslim countries with nothing to show for it but more Muslims. STOP.
bring our troops home,
all of them.
from germany,england, south korea, japan and the whole mid east.
bring em home and to hell with the world.
Personally, I question this move by this particular President. While I fully agree and feel relieved to get out from another of the world’s hellholes, leaving there with our tail tucked isn’t exactly what I would have in mind.
It is a shame the entire effort was squandered by the President and the leftist agenda on the ROE.
We’ll be back in less than a decade from now, hopefully with a much better defined objective. As the middle east continues to escalate in hostilities with the world, this is very far from the end of the war.
Well, just exactly what else are we supposed to do? Stay in ‘stan forever? We would be making this move under any POTUS IMO.
When we went in 13 years ago I think we knew it wasn’t going to be a nation building exercise really and that we’d be checking out as soon as possible. Iraq’s the same way. We shouldn’t and can’t make them colonies. We can’t stay there indefinitely.
Yep, we shouldn’t stick around there unless the area gets depopulated like we did to the indians. Unfortunately, that strategy doesn’t play well in the modern world.
At the very least, we need to bring back the Draft, or better yet, Israeli style compulsory service. It’s just too easy to send somebody else’s kids to War.
Well be back in less than a decade from now, hopefully with a much better defined objective.
These wars are not about our freedom or our safety. They are about corporatism.
Without a bilateral security agreement (BSA) in place, the legal status of U.S. troops in Afghanistan is up in the air and they could potentially be subject to criminal prosecution. One key purpose of the BSA is to formally document the legal status of U.S. military personnel and certify that they are subject to the Uniform Code of Military Conduct under U.S. law rather than the laws of Afghanistan.
Now I would assume that most Pentagon brass today and the entire administration doesn't give a rat's @ss about the troops on the ground, but it gets a bit dicey if the government of Afghanistan issues an arrest warrant sometime down the road against senior U.S. military (or civilian) officials for alleged crimes, atrocities, etc. by the U.S. military. That's the sort of thing that would have enough credibility to keep these people from traveling to third-party countries where the police might actually act on the warrant.
The U.S. military that you see today is the product of a post-1900 globalist empire that has no basis in Constitutional law.
“Well be back in less than a decade from now”
After there’s another smoking crater in a blue city.
Even simpler...yank 10, hell make it 5, random students from each of the Ivy League colleges and send them to combat units every time they are deployed. The elite won’t get us into these messes anymore.
Does the Constitution also make it clear that this country is not supposed to have worldwide interests -- both national security interests and commercial interests?
And Omar that bassturd remains free
eff that plan
“It’s a bluff by Obama.” - KT McFarland, WMAL/ABCNews 8am interview on the Morning Show.
Bring all the troops home, post them on our Mexican border, setup long thin military and training bases along the entire border. Erect the fence and have the men patrol the fence as part of weekly duties.
Let European countries defend their own borders, bring those troops home too!
A year from now, Karzai will be living in a mansion in Switzerland,
or his head will be on a pike in Kabul.
Not just the southern border,
Lot of undesirables slip in from Canada also,
You are correct. How many lives and how much treasure are we willing to pour into these shitholes for no discernible purpose? Obama should have brought them all home the day after his inauguration.
A boy from Kentucky was killed a couple of weeks ago. And it was not for our freedom as so many like to say.
My nephew was killed in Fallujah.
You know, the place we spent so many lives only to give it back to the Taliban.
And for what reason?
Afganistan is rich in uranium and other precious natural materials.
For what, so some American bid ness men can make bundles of money at the expense of our boys?
It’s not a bluff, the order went out two weeks ago that no replacement tracked or wheeled vehicles were to be sent to Afghanistan.
A year ago a relative of mine went to Afghanistan and his units assignment was to prepare equipment for return to CONUS or Germany.
Well, it’s not hard to predict. We pulled out of Iraq lock, stock and barrel because they refused to give our soldiers any legal protections from lawsuits. If Afghanistan is also refusing to do so, then we *have* to leave.
Last I heard, Karzai was demanding large sums of money in order to remove our military hardware from the country. We need to gather all those assets up tight, warn the locals to stay away, and disintegrate them with a couple of A-10 Warthogs. Maybe even a B-52 run.
Then leave Karzai to the tender care of the Taliban.
“For what, so some American bid ness men can make bundles of money at the expense of our boys?”
Yes, that was part of the reason.
However, natural resources are also critical to national security.
A severe fuel shortage in the USA would be devastating and can easily result in a collapse with millions dead. I see nothing wrong with using the US military to secure necessary resources while such a threat exists.
“War for Oil” is spouted by the hippies to sound terrible but we would all be nearly dead without oil and some rare earth minerals.
“The U.S. military that you see today is the product of a post-1900 globalist empire that has no basis in Constitutional law.”
Exactly what empire are you talking about? Post 1900? You mean the Spanish American War? LOL The conquest of Puerto Rico??
Also note below that Congress has every power to raise armies and navies and that calling out the militia is also a power, although well down the list.
“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress...”
Currently we are producing more energy than we need.
Course obammy’s friends hate coal so that is off the table.
And North shore oil is a no go as well as Canadian shale oil.
Other than some “rare minerals” we have most everything we need.
Course if butt heads restrict oil, coal, natural gas exploitation including fracking then hell yeah, let’s rely on Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.
I'd also point out that Congress has every power to raise Armies and Navies, but this power comes with a responsibility to issue formal declarations of war. I can't imagine any of the Founding Fathers would be comfortable with the idea of having U.S. military forces in a place like South Korea for 60 'effing years without even so much as a declaration of war from Congress.
Who is mining in Afghanistan?
The issue is not about declarations of war, but whether or not Congress has the power to raise armies independant of the state militias, which of course, they do. It says so in plain language. What Congress does with their power is a different matter.
I still want to know what post 1900 American empire you are referring to. That was actually my primary question.
The U.S. now has a permanent military presence all over the globe, and will move mountains to promote our brand of radical secularism in any country we deem a trading partner.
You don't really think the U.S. military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan had anything to do with some kind of half-assed "War on Terror," do you?
I’m not sure I understand your leaps here.
So a majority of New Mexican citizens petition the Federal Government for statehood, which is granted, which causes the federal income tax?? And somehow, Wilson entering WWI with a ligitimate congressional Declaration of War isn’t covered in the “governing documents of this nation.”
You make no sense to me.
If you mean the Mexican War (1846 not “post 1900”) was an imperial war, that is a fair statement open to debate. However, we have examples from earlier in US history of “imperial” wars - Monroe’s annexation of Florida (~1819) or attempted invasions of Canada during the War of 1812. Note that President Monroe was a bona fide Founding Father, so for anyone to state that the founders never intended the US to conduct “imperial” wars is flat-out wrong.
I do encourage you to learn more about my home state of New Mexico, however. It’s a VERY special part of the United States.
I think the later...
For better or worse, the earlier "imperial" wars you describe were for the purpose of expanding the United States as a nation. It's been decades since we've done that. Now, we grow through colonization even as we allow millions of foreign invaders to pour over our own borders.
“For better or worse, the earlier “imperial” wars you describe were for the purpose of expanding the United States as a nation. It’s been decades since we’ve done that.”
I have Pinoy friends who truly and strongly wish that the Philipines were the 51st state. Imagine if that had come to pass. Cheers FRiend! We agree on many points.
And as an FYI ... I spent some time out in the Santa Fe-Las Vegas area a few years back. That's some really pretty country you've got out there!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.