Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WeHo Bar To ‘Deny Entry’ To Lawmakers Who Back Anti-Gay Legislation
CBS -- Los Angeles ^ | 2/25/2014

Posted on 02/26/2014 6:47:48 AM PST by Kazan

WEST HOLLYWOOD (CBSLA.com) — Southern California lawmakers who support legislation to discriminate against gays and lesbians now have one less hotspot to visit in West Hollywood.

David Cooley, the founder of The Abbey Food & Bar located at 692 North Robertson Blvd., has announced the popular gay bar will add any legislator in any state who votes for “bills to allow for discrimination against LGBT people” to a “Deny Entry List.”

In a statement, Cooley said The Abbey will also display headshots of each state representative who support bills on the security list, including Kansas House Bill 2453, Arizona Senate Bill 1062, Idaho House Bill 426, Ohio House Bill 82 and other similar proposals.

“I want to send a message to all those people out there who conflate Christian values with discrimination: we don’t want your kind here,” Cooley said. “I’ve learned that I can’t stop crazy, ignorant or stupid, but I can stop it from coming through my doors.”

The move isn’t the first time The Abbey has waded into state politics: when gay marriage was still illegal in California in May 2012, the bar announced a ban on all bachelorette parties, which it called an “offensive heterosexual tradition” that flaunts marriage inequality.

The Abbey, which features a rainbow-colored cross as its logo and touts itself as the “Best Gay Bar In The World,” also called on other local restaurants, hotels, and other retailers “that appreciate their LGBT customers” to enact similar bans.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
So, homosexual business owners can discriminate because they disagree with someone's beliefs for behavior but Christian business owners can't do the same?
1 posted on 02/26/2014 6:47:48 AM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Illegal for the same reasons that businesses cannot deny service to homosexuals.


2 posted on 02/26/2014 6:49:09 AM PST by SgtHooper (If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

A crushing blow!


3 posted on 02/26/2014 6:50:49 AM PST by 'smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

EXACTLY!


4 posted on 02/26/2014 6:52:25 AM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Why would anyone straight want to go to a gay bar?


5 posted on 02/26/2014 6:53:22 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Oh, snap! Denied entry to a faggie joint! Oh the huge manatee!!

Yes, I’m aware of the roaring double standard. Faggies routinely get away with what would get normal folks arrested in a heartbeat.

What’s next? Faggie tourists boycotting entire states!!?


6 posted on 02/26/2014 6:53:48 AM PST by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
I'm just guessing here, but anybody who votes against the gay lobby probably wasn't going to be a patron anyway. Or shouldn't be.

Aside from gay lobby grandstanding, this means nothing.

7 posted on 02/26/2014 6:54:12 AM PST by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

I might just go there and proclaim I am a Christian who supports those kinds of bills. Have them refuse me service, and then head to the nearest lawyer. Hello payday.


8 posted on 02/26/2014 6:55:31 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

“The Abbey, which features a rainbow-colored cross as its logo”

Blasphemy which won’t be amusing at the End. Just sayin’


9 posted on 02/26/2014 6:55:42 AM PST by tgusa (gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

It would be funny to see a church fill a gay bar and start reading Romans 1 and some other choice verses. Would that be a hate crime?


10 posted on 02/26/2014 6:56:01 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

lol. Oh Lord.


11 posted on 02/26/2014 6:57:48 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Well, I’m not a lawmaker, but put my name on the list.


12 posted on 02/26/2014 6:57:58 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

For the same reason gays sought out a Christian business.

To stir up crap and bully them with lawsuits


13 posted on 02/26/2014 6:58:00 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Hmmm, guess that means that other bars can “bar” those who support gay legislation, eh?

This is gonna get nasty, and I really no longer give a smelly Obama about gays...or anything they say or do.

Shove it...just keep your shoving and moaning in a soundproof room.


14 posted on 02/26/2014 6:59:03 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

If you use the toilet at The Abbey Food & Bar you might catch AIDS.

Best course is to shun a queer establishment


15 posted on 02/26/2014 7:01:14 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

hmmmm sounds like a lawsuit is needed to MAKE THEM serve non-gays!


16 posted on 02/26/2014 7:01:44 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

By the time Obama is driven from the White House it will be against the law for parents to teach their children that homosexualism is abnormal.

Or for parents to say anything or take any action that contradicts the pro-homosexual education their children receive in the government schools.

The Feds will also require all heterosexuals to undergo Sexual Readjustment and Reorientation at a FEMA camp.


17 posted on 02/26/2014 7:05:52 AM PST by Iron Munro (Eight died on that bridge at Concord, back in 1775. How many will it take this time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

Yep, absolutley illegal, I would suggest a lawmaker go, get denied, and then sue them out of existance. Use their same tactics against them.


18 posted on 02/26/2014 7:06:32 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
So, homosexual business owners can discriminate because they disagree with someone's beliefs for behavior but Christian business owners can't do the same?

LOL! Oh, the irony!

19 posted on 02/26/2014 7:08:02 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Play the 'Knockout Game' with someone owning a 9mm and you get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Bingo! What is sauce for the activist goose, is sauce for the gander.


20 posted on 02/26/2014 7:08:49 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

bwaaaaaaaaaaaa,who cares..I would not be caught in a gay bar or to any bar gay or other wise..I would be afraid of catching something if I visited such a place as a so called gay bar..


21 posted on 02/26/2014 7:08:58 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Clever bar. Free promotion, complements of CBS.


22 posted on 02/26/2014 7:09:53 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

EXACTLY!It’s”Their Way Or The Highway”!!If you go along with them,you are said to be TOLERANT???????????


23 posted on 02/26/2014 7:11:24 AM PST by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Not very “tolerant” of them is it?


24 posted on 02/26/2014 7:13:05 AM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

How is it that a business owner has the constitutional right to refuse service to someone who has a right to carry a firearm...yet no one says anything. If the govt steeped in an ordered them to serve them...there would be a huge backlash...i don’t see the difference here


25 posted on 02/26/2014 7:14:29 AM PST by bike800
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

26 posted on 02/26/2014 7:16:00 AM PST by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; Perdogg; Liz; BufordP; TADSLOS; EXCH54FE; ..
RE WEST HOLLYWOOD (CBSLA.com) — Southern California lawmakers who support legislation to discriminate against gays and lesbians now have one less hotspot to visit in West Hollywood.
David Cooley, the founder of The Abbey Food & Bar located at 692 North Robertson Blvd., has announced the popular gay bar will add any legislator in any state who votes for “bills to allow for discrimination against LGBT people” to a “Deny Entry List.”

Cavuto got into this a-bit yesterday.

Because gays as protected minorities are defined by their feelings, gay protection laws protect their actions/behavior.
Example : No laws refuse to marry gays to gays as long as they are the opposite sex, or even to marry gays to heterosexuals. That is why this is not the same as black-white marriage discrimination.

So its OK to discriminate against those who support these religious liberty bills, but not to discriminate against those who support a gay lifestyle?

The second is protected by the 14th amendment but the first is not?

That is a how this fight should HAVE been approached to have any chance to win it.

27 posted on 02/26/2014 7:16:26 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'You can keep your doctor ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

I prefer Whataburger anyway. I have successfully stayed out of Kalifornia since 1984.


28 posted on 02/26/2014 7:22:29 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

The bar owner doesn’t agree that businesses should be able to deny service and promotes this by denying service?

hypocrisy much?


29 posted on 02/26/2014 7:25:21 AM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper
David could take his sodomite bar and stuff it up his cooley. Why would any straight person want to go to a gay bar? I can just imagine how gross the men's room is.
30 posted on 02/26/2014 7:27:13 AM PST by peeps36 (I'm Not A Racist, I Hate Douchebags of All Colors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

Intolerant tolerance.


31 posted on 02/26/2014 7:27:38 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

I have added The Abbey Food & Bar located at 692 North Robertson Blvd. to my “Deny Patronage” list.

If I can find a picture of David Cooley, I’ll start a remembrance wall (to remind me not to eat there).

What right does Mr. Cooley have to state that religious tenets constitute “discrimination?”

God is not mocked, Mr. Cooley.


32 posted on 02/26/2014 7:29:10 AM PST by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

How does ones behavior make one a “minority”?


33 posted on 02/26/2014 7:31:15 AM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Not serving people I disagree with is OK for me but not for thee.


34 posted on 02/26/2014 7:34:51 AM PST by NRA1995 (I'd rather be a living "gun culture" member than a dead anti-gun candy-ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; Forward the Light Brigade; Bon of Babble; ...
RE :”How does ones behavior make one a “minority”?

Great question

simple , using Public opinion : By winning the PR battle by using better SOUNDING arguments.

GOPs and even so-cons have been depending on not very good arguments like ‘we believe’, which has recently morphed into ‘religious freedom’
while libs have been making a case that gays are born different through no choice of their own and their orientation is identical to race.

I never see a Republican or a so-con on TV taking that argument apart.

35 posted on 02/26/2014 7:40:07 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'You can keep your doctor ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
On what legal basis does the homosexual ban people?

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

36 posted on 02/26/2014 7:40:40 AM PST by expatguy (Donate to "An American Expat in SE Asia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Go with a dozen friends of both sexes, and make sure you have your lawyer with you. You just may wind up as the owner of a gay bar. What you do with it afterwards is your business.


37 posted on 02/26/2014 8:02:00 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

It may be illegal for gay bars to refuse service to Christians, but it shouldn’t be. Constitutional protections override any state or federal laws, and civil rights laws have created only more legal chaos and litigation.

Government no longer has an overriding compelling interest to force business to serve people they don’t want to serve. Freedom of association is protected by the constitution. I should not give up that right simply because I operate a business.

There are probably plenty of other gay bars available for Christians should they choose not to go to this particular one. No one’s fundamental freedoms are harmed by the gay bar’s actions, just like a homosexual couple hasn’t lost their freedom when a bakery won’t make a wedding cake for them. The constitution only protects citizens from discrimination by government, not privately owned businesses. It doesn’t give you a right to force someone else to serve you (unless that person represents the government of course).

Can you imagine the litigation that would go away if the SCOTUS spoke clearly on the constitutionally protected freedoms of association and religion as well as private property rights? As a society, we keep having to go back to the courts over and over again, because they’ve muddied the waters over something that should be nearly black and white.

I understand the civil rights era tossed out all sorts of constitutionally protected rights, because some white businesses were refusing to do business with blacks. Maybe in the day one could not buy groceries if one was black, because there was only one store and it refused to serve blacks. That’s probably not true today, because there are plenty of businesses that will serve anyone who enters the door.

That’s the bottom line here. If a private business wants to lose money by refusing to serve certain people, that should be their choice, and that is EXACTLY what will happen if some business starts turning away blacks or gays or Christians. It’s a stupid way to do business, so it will be self correcting over time (those businesses will likely cease to exist).

Again, none of this makes it OK for government to show ANY preference for anyone (like they do today...an absolute travesty) or discriminate on the basis of race, sex, or religion. Government is absolutely prevented by the constitution from treating people differently based on those constitutionally protected categories, gay being NOT one of them.


38 posted on 02/26/2014 8:02:43 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Sodomy and abortion: the only constitutional rights cherished by Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

> “The Abbey, which features a rainbow-colored cross as its logo”
>
> Blasphemy which won’t be amusing at the End. Just sayin’

What blasphemy? The rainbow is the symbol of the covenant between God and all living things on Earth.
— Or are you going to assert that a small group of people is greater than God (and can therefore wholly re-purpose the symbol).


39 posted on 02/26/2014 8:04:02 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

Too bad, courts already ruled you can’t discriminate. Serve one, serve all.


40 posted on 02/26/2014 8:17:18 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

The bar proves they likes Arizona Senate Bill 1062 because they are doing what the bill calls for but try to spin it it’s a no sale for them.


41 posted on 02/26/2014 8:33:19 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

hey,I’m fine with that, it’s a free country

listen up - the Constitutional meaning of a “civil right” is what THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT ALLOWED TO DO

it is ONLY the government that cannot make value judgements about people, either as part of government or as part of what government does, not because in their private affairs and associations people cannot make such judgements, but because the government is everyone’s government, no matter what our differences are socially

in our private affairs and associations, and when not in any relationship with any governmental body in those affairs, we are free to make value judgements about who we will associate with, or not

the Jim Crow laws that created and enforced segregation WERE the government, and as acts of government they were contrary to the mandates of the post-Civil war Constitutional amendments, that restricted how GOVERNMENT could not discriminate - meaning, who could not be kept out of government and how the laws and enforcement of law could not discriminate, and by what distinctions they could not discriminate (nothing about “gay” in THERE)

those amendments were NOT Constitutional mandates restricting the Liberty of individuals in their private affairs and associations


42 posted on 02/26/2014 8:57:38 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

exactly. Government can force a bakery to make a cake for a wedding, but this bar can discriminate because they are intolerant of opposing views.

I see a huge double standard.


43 posted on 02/26/2014 9:09:19 AM PST by 12th_Monkey (One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale; Perdogg

LMAO! Pro-family politicians “banned” from a gay bar? My mind has just been blown. What’s next? Ban Michael Moore from a diet food store maybe?


44 posted on 02/26/2014 9:09:49 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Meant to ping you as well.


45 posted on 02/26/2014 9:10:10 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: peeps36

Why? In this case—lawsuit cash! Er, campaign cash? :-)


46 posted on 02/26/2014 9:53:32 AM PST by SgtHooper (If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

With ya all the way.!


47 posted on 02/26/2014 9:56:43 AM PST by SgtHooper (If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

The sheer cognitive dissonance must be making the little orgasm addicts’ heads spin.


48 posted on 02/26/2014 2:55:07 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

With my luck, and of course in California my odds are higher, that I would draw an activist liberal judge who would find for them and make me pay all costs.


49 posted on 02/27/2014 4:19:09 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
It appears some people's private property (homosexuals) are more valuable than other people's (Christians) private property.

We no longer have the rule of law. We have the rule of politically correct power.

50 posted on 02/27/2014 7:09:52 AM PST by Gritty (Inside every liberal is a totalitarian screaming to get out! - David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson