RIGHT ON!!!!
PLEASE Make Your Donation Today.
GO Monthly, if you possibly and reliably can.
No kidding, everyone, we're truly going to need FR now, more than ever before.
Oh, the poor sensitive Muslims. Wouldn’t want to hurt their feelings. /sarc
The video that has been downloaded how many times by now?
“Film that sparked violence”
It didn’t.
Hence, there is no freedom of speech when ti pertains to Islam. Our court system has bowed to Mecca and worshiped the meteor.
ACLU, you’re being paged.
This has to go to the supremes. I am not sure they would go along on this one.
Note the actresses irreparable harm includes all the death threats she is getting, from the peace loving religion this film impugned.
Tell me why any freedom loving American citizen should give a rat’s rear that muslims don’t want Muhammed depicted? I suggest they don’t depict him then, and get off my lawn. I will “depict” anything I want.
ridiculous
I cannot wait to find out who actually made and planted this video. Hillary was right there as the advance team promoting this film/video on day one. Oh how this nasty woman grates on my sensibilities.
The only thing this will accomplish is to embolden the invaders, a guarantee of more killings and destruction.
Oh, and it also weakens our nation’s constitutional protection of free speech.
Because Catholics don’t butcher people, Serrano’s horribly offensive jar of urine, and Ofili’s defiled Holy Virgin were presented in the face of vociferous protests.
In the case of Serrano’s piece, when then-mayor Rudi Giuliani threatened to cut off NYC funding to the Brooklyn Museum, he was lectured to about free speech by leftwingers.
You lie, Fox. It did NOT “spark the violence.” Idjits.
This is Fox reporting the lie that it sparked violence.
Following the example of our lawless AG, court order can be safely ignored if desired.
So many lies, and only the first two sentences of the article.
SILENCE! I KILL YOU!
“Katy Perry Dark Horse video under fire by members of Muslim community”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3127000/posts
“Which”, not “that”.
Won’t stick. There’s a entire volume of USSC rulings forbidding prior restraint. Near v Minnesota and NY Times v United States are the two most famous.