Uh, yeah, no. My intel guys told me where that's been.
Posted on 02/27/2014 1:55:39 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
Idiots.
Oh, I wouldn’t worry. It looks like there may be another Cold War on the horizon. Only this time, it will be America that represents the forces of depravity and Godless evil.
“Squirrel!!!!!”
[it’s easier than standing up to Obama]
GOP - Goofballs On Parade trying to tick off the Globull Warming Collective?
Uh, yeah, no. My intel guys told me where that's been.
Yup.
Lets engage in a new cold war only this time we start in a position where we’re only marginally better off than Russia was when they collapsed the last time.
Besides, its not like we don’t have enough excuses to strip constitutional rights away as it is.
Things can't be that bad throughout the rest of the world, with Kerry spending the majority of his time focused on Global Warming.
The guy is a moron. Maybe he is getting money from defense spending thats why he think its better
These people need to be primaried.
aint that the truth. I’ve heard a French Historian say that that USA is currently in a cold civil war.
And Putin is protecting Christianity and morality, at least officially. The US is aggressively spreading its LGBTQ agenda worldwide and pushing and threatening countries to get them to accept the depravity.
Do we have anyone who’s even kinda smart?
We were always on the edge of instant global annihilation, not to mention the huge combat losses in wars and military operations, even when we weren’t fighting, we were losing thousands of men a year in the military.
Perhaps he can re-imprison many nations of millions of people under the Soviet Empire, to simplify things.
Rohrabacher has been defending Putin acting in self-interest on Russia Today.
Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia, and Emerging Threats
http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/subcommittees/europe-eurasia-and-emerging-threats
Obama already started the New Cold War and then Surrendered
Its a lousy title.
There a number of words modern journalism is derilect in abandoning the use of, the are the words “some”, and the words that express a number.
In this case it is a matter of saying, as they did:
“Top Republicans Call for Return to Cold War”,
instead of the more honest, less hyberpolic:
“Two Republicans Call for Return to Cold War”.
One might have thought that McConnel, Boehner, their lieutenants and the likes of McGain, Grassley and others led the “call”, and for many of the masses that only read headlines and not the details, many will be given that impression. Many Dims will now go ahead and use that assumed truth and will be claiming “the GOP” wants to return to the cold war.
The journalistic deceit is no different than their inability to use the phrase “Some scientists” when commenting on a scientific matter, selling to the masses as they always do that any use of “Scientists” means “science” and there’s only one opinion in science.
Well, I think there are many opinions in the GOP about any “return to the cold war”. Whether I agree with the “cold warrriors” or not 2 Repiblicans in congress does not a party or “the top” of it make.
They really want to stay the minority party in perpetuity, don’t they?
When the president says things would be easier if he were president of China, is he actually calling for a dictatorship? Or offering to move across the Pacific? Or just comparing his situation with Hu's?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
