[Nachum]

The actual case depends on the fact that an occupant of the home did in fact give the police permission to enter and conduct a search. The title is misleading and tendentious.

Camel's nose in the tent.

[Pollster1]

"The actual case depends on the fact that an occupant of the home did in fact give the police permission to enter and conduct a search. The title is misleading and tendentious." Camel's nose in the tent.

Facts matter. Just as you can refuse permission for a search and then tomorrow grant that permission, however unlikely that change of heart might be, one roommate can refuse permission and then another roommate can later grant permission. I don't like it when the government works around the Bill of Rights, but in this case they were (barely) within the letter and the spirit of the Constitution.