Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lois Lerner demands Immunity; Time for Congress to go on Offense (on Obama Family's Terrorist ties)
Walid Shoebat ^ | 2-27-2014 | Shoebat Foundation

Posted on 02/27/2014 7:33:10 PM PST by smoothsailing

February 27, 2014

Lois Lerner demands Immunity; Time for Congress to go on Offense

by Shoebat Foundation

Well, that didn’t take long. One day after the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee sent former IRS Tax Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner a letter requiring her appearance before the Committee on March 5th, her attorneys say she won’t testify without being granted immunity. Once again, Republicans are given the perfect opportunity to introduce the Malik Obama scandal to the public.

Is this why Lois Lerner wants Immunity?

Is this why Lois Lerner wants Immunity?

Via Fox News:

The attorney for Lois Lerner, a central figure in the IRS scandal, signaled Wednesday that his client will not comply with a request to testify on Capitol Hill next week.

Attorney William Taylor said Lerner, who resigned last year as the agency’s tax-exempt organizations chief, will return and testify only if compelled by a federal court or if given immunity for her testimony.

Taylor stated his position in a letter to Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. He was responding to a letter Tuesday from Issa saying, in part, that Lerner’s testimony remains “critical to the committee’s investigation.”

The committee continues to investigate the IRS’ targeting of Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations trying to get tax-exempt status.

Despite Taylor’s letter, staffers with the committee told Fox News they still expect Lerner to show up on March 5. Unclear is whether she would answer any questions.

That last sentence is in bold because it may provide the Committee with a huge opportunity. All eyes will be on this hearing, even if Lerner says nothing. If one, just one, Congressmen brings up the issue of Lerner’s signature being at the bottom of the 501(c)(3) approval letter for Malik Obama’s Foundation, the matter will be on the public record and the ball will be placed firmly back in Lerner’s court.

As an aside, Lerner’s name is not the only name on Malik’s approval letter. Perhaps the other IRS employee at the time should be questioned.

At that point, the Committee could begin playing hardball. If Lerner wants immunity, it should be conditional, to include her giving up everything she knows about why a man who has been found to have extremely nefarious connections to terrorists was given U.S. taxpayer dollars at her direction. If, as evidence suggests, Malik Obama qualifies as an enemy combatant, Lerner may have provided material support to terrorism during the commission of another crime (illegally backdating the approval by 38 months). Democrats could be in the unenviable position of choosing terrorism over the rule of law.

What is apparently not acknowledged by Lerner’s attorneys is the finding that the reason she is being called back to testify is because the Committee determined that she waived her Fifth amendment right against self-incrimination when she declared her innocence prior to doing so. Here is the now classic video of Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) calling out Lerner after doing so:

VIDEO-Rep. Trey Gowdy Objects to IRS Official Ms. Lerner Taking the 5th Amendment

Last May, we suggested a list of questions that should be asked of Lerner if granted immunity in exchange for her testimony. In fact, these questions should still be asked of her – even if she refuses to speak – on March 5th. Shortly after the hearing, she’s likely to start singing like a canary.

Not only would such questions put Lerner on defense but Democratic Committee members who’ve been running interference for the Obama administration and the IRS will suddenly be faced with the prospect of running interference for a woman who may have aided and abetted terrorists.

It’s long past time for Congress to go on offense. Multiple members of Congress were sent this information via U.S. certified mail on February 20th – including three members on the Oversight Committee; Gowdy is among them.

Barack Obama's Family Connection to Terrorism


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: gettherope; impeachnow; irs; irsteapartyscandal; lerner; loislerner; shoebat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-91 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2014 7:33:10 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Why ? Obama said the IRS did nothing wrong ,LOL, he’ll give her a Pardon for her loyalty anyway


2 posted on 02/27/2014 7:35:45 PM PST by molson209 (Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Thanks for posting.


3 posted on 02/27/2014 7:38:18 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

We got a bunch of gutless turds in congress and Obama knows it.

Nobody is gonna do JS about this treasonous SOS in the white house until the literal human deathtoll exceeds ten thousand.


4 posted on 02/27/2014 7:39:17 PM PST by Safrguns (PM me if you like to play Minecraft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
will return and testify only if compelled by a federal court

Don't need a federal court, just have the Sergeant at Arms take her into custody. I wonder if the guys in congress know how to play hardball. Politically, nobody is going to get too upset over forcing an IRS official to testify.

5 posted on 02/27/2014 7:40:28 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

We can nail her for our pound of flesh....

Or give her immunity and get the whole enchilada...

Of course just because she gets immunity doesn’t mean she will be safe from the specter of Arkancide from the DNC operators....

If I were here i would still avoid parks and planes even after getting immunity....

Also did Holder have his panic attack before or after Lerner requested immunity?


6 posted on 02/27/2014 7:41:42 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Yep take her into custody and put her in the jail cell and leave her there until she talks. They’ve put reporters in jail for much less than what she is probably guilty of.


7 posted on 02/27/2014 7:42:58 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Going into Politic Free Zone Momma Grizzly hibernation for a while after this week, maybe forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; LucyT; null and void; Nachum; WildHighlander57; maggief

POP corn anyone?
Hope she stays out of parks, off airplanes and hires a food taster


8 posted on 02/27/2014 7:44:14 PM PST by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Did she submit a proffer? I mean you just don’t ask for immunity without a proffer. You have to offer up a bigger fish than you are.


9 posted on 02/27/2014 7:45:50 PM PST by Usagi_yo (Standardization is an Evolutionary dead end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

I agree with you. They could hold her indefinitely in the basement of the House. They have the authority and the funds to make a nice comfy jail cell for her. The Sgt-at-Arms can designate members of the Capitol Police as her jailers.


10 posted on 02/27/2014 7:46:01 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: molson209

What’s wrong with sending her to jail for 3 years?


11 posted on 02/27/2014 7:46:49 PM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

FIrst they came for criminal IRS officials and no one said a word then....s/


12 posted on 02/27/2014 7:47:08 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; LucyT; null and void; Nachum; WildHighlander57; maggief

POP corn anyone?
Hope she stays out of parks, off airplanes and hires a food taster


13 posted on 02/27/2014 7:48:12 PM PST by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Also did Holder have his panic attack before or after Lerner requested immunity?

Good question. Maybe it's time to call him back before the committee too. Maybe he'll start falling down and hitting his head the way Hillary does.

14 posted on 02/27/2014 7:51:02 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Time for Congress to go on Offense.

Congress lead by Boehner? Yeah right. Don't make me laugh it hurts too much.

15 posted on 02/27/2014 7:51:26 PM PST by sjmjax (Politicans are much like bananas. They start off green, turn yellow then rot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Just because she gets immunity doesn’t mean she’ll spill any beans.


16 posted on 02/27/2014 7:54:51 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The EXEMPT are in no hurry.

THEY have their kiddie brothels from ACORN,
and the private porn pics provided by the NSA,
and private financial data provided by the IRS,
and best of all?

THEY and their families and their staff
and their families are all EXEMPT.

Congress, beginning with Issa and Cummings, belong
in prison for throwing the USA and its Law down
the tubes while THEY made millions of dollars.


17 posted on 02/27/2014 7:54:52 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

What a good question. That should tell us something. Other posts on this thread making good points against granting, however.


18 posted on 02/27/2014 7:55:03 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: molson209

You never give immunity unless you know what she has to tell and part of the deal is that she tells what she knows under oath. If she waffles, no deal.


19 posted on 02/27/2014 7:56:17 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; ...
Avoiding driving a Mercedes would also be a good plan...

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

20 posted on 02/27/2014 7:56:37 PM PST by null and void (<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Another good point. “I refuse to answer” can just change to “I don’t recall.”


21 posted on 02/27/2014 7:58:18 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

What’s the value of Congressional/Senate immunity? It’s not like John Dean et al. didn’t get prosecuted anyway.


22 posted on 02/27/2014 7:58:23 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

It’s a tradeoff. We could send her to jail, but then there would be no reason for her to give us Obama, Pelosi, Biden, or whomever else would be even more worth it to send to jail.


23 posted on 02/27/2014 7:58:55 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Huh, anyone want to bet on what kind of accident befalls her?


24 posted on 02/27/2014 8:01:09 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The GOPe won’t do squat


25 posted on 02/27/2014 8:05:04 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

How much does she know, and who can she implicate? Since Watergate the White Huts have learned how to protect the Big Kahuna!


26 posted on 02/27/2014 8:05:11 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious! We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

O boy! IRS Jeooardy!
I’ll take heart attack for $500 Jack


27 posted on 02/27/2014 8:09:39 PM PST by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: struggle

She could pull a Webb Hubbell

http://washingtonexaminer.com/heres-why-lois-lerner-could-be-the-webb-hubbell-of-the-irs-scandal/article/2544776


28 posted on 02/27/2014 8:11:02 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
Nobody is gonna do JS about this treasonous SOS in the white house until the literal human deathtoll exceeds ten thousand.

In UK they are Euthanizing over 10,000 a month:

130,000 elderly patients killed every year by ‘death pathway’, claims leading UK doctor

by Thaddeus Baklinski Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:02 EST Tags: euthanasia, patrick pullicino, uk

LONDON, June 21, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An eminent British doctor told a meeting of the Royal Society of Medicine in London that every year 130,000 elderly patients that die while under the care of the National Health Service (NHS) have been effectively euthanized by being put on the controversial Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), n a protocol for care of the terminally ill that he described as a “death pathway.”

Once Obamacare death panels kick in.....and scaled for relative population size...that makes something like 750,000 euthanizing events a year in the USA.

29 posted on 02/27/2014 8:17:23 PM PST by spokeshave (OMG.......Schadenfreude overload is not covered under Obamacare :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo
They’ve put reporters in jail for much less than what she is probably guilty of.

Well then, put her in jail with a gaggle of reporters and leave them there.

30 posted on 02/27/2014 8:17:30 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

31 posted on 02/27/2014 8:22:41 PM PST by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sjmjax
The same Boner who brought his knee pads to a one on one meeting with the puny dictator. He must have wanted to talk to Boner about how they could pass amnesty. He's a pathetic putz with orange skin.
32 posted on 02/27/2014 8:22:59 PM PST by peeps36 (I'm Not A Racist, I Hate Douchebags of All Colors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
...and don't forget...Holders people are gainfully employed as your local Obamacare Navigators


33 posted on 02/27/2014 8:25:17 PM PST by spokeshave (OMG.......Schadenfreude overload is not covered under Obamacare :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Trey Gowdy: NO WAY we’re giving Lois Lerner immunity,PERIOD!

http://therightscoop.com/trey-gowdy-no-way-were-giving-lois-lerner-immunity-period/


34 posted on 02/27/2014 8:27:34 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Many thanks for the ping, hoosiermama!

Get that IRS mmmmm...... person on the stand!

From the link upthread:

“...However, Ms. Lerner’s name is not the only one on that document belonging to an IRS employee. Consider the name Renee Railey Norton, who appears to be the one responsible for processing Malik’s 501(c)(3) approval. Ms. Lerner is on paid leave, raking in $3400 / week. Is Ms. Norton on paid leave or is she still working in Cincinnati?..”


35 posted on 02/27/2014 8:28:25 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Speaker of the House Trey Gowdy has a nice ring to it! B^)


36 posted on 02/27/2014 8:32:55 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

i don’t believe she can demand it. they can compel her to testify.


37 posted on 02/27/2014 8:55:11 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

somehow i don’ t think she wants to spend the rest of her life in jail refusing to testify.


38 posted on 02/27/2014 8:57:08 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

In the Bush era, a top former IRS official who demanded immunity in a case involving targeting of opposition political groups would be a HUGE story. I just checked, and did not see it anywhere on my MSNBC default home page or on my local newspaper website. Maybe it’s there, buried beneath piles of celebrity and “lifestyle” crap, but you get the idea. The MSM is a colossal joke, a very bad joke.


39 posted on 02/27/2014 9:14:01 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
Don't need a federal court, just have the Sergeant at Arms take her into custody

IIRC, the sergeant at arms' authority no longer extends beyond the curb of Capitol Hill.

Nor is there anywhere to keep her in custody. The Capitol Jail is not capable of feeding or keeping prisoners overnight.

Some years ago, Congress agreed to rely on the Justice Dept in matters like these. The understanding was that, even if the administration was an opposition party, they would act in good faith in such matters.

But this Justice Dept isn't going to arrest or jail anybody at the behest of the Republican House.

40 posted on 02/27/2014 9:14:35 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Issa, Bonehead, what an excuse for human intelligence. Nothing here.
41 posted on 02/27/2014 9:21:17 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

it gets more and more interesting doesn’t it? I mean after all she told us she did nothing wrong just before taking the 5th. Now she wants immunity. Heck I’d give it to her IF she gives the impeachment proof for O


42 posted on 02/27/2014 9:22:10 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

doesnt matter they have the emails as evidence. They can send her to prison on that.


43 posted on 02/27/2014 9:22:12 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

“i don’t believe she can demand it. they can compel her to testify.”
*********************************************************************

Agree. My recollection is twofold:

1) In her first appearance SHE GAVE UP HER 5TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO NOT TESTIFY when she began running her mouth and gave her statement (speech)

and

2) They didn’t “dismiss/excuse” her following her attempt to exercise her 5th amendment rights but, instead, simply let her leave BUT subject to recall.

They should just recall her sorry, lying ass and start the inquisition and lead her into a “perjury trap”. Then let her attorney make an acceptable proffer for immunity.


44 posted on 02/27/2014 9:23:51 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
B T T T ! ! ! ©

45 posted on 02/27/2014 9:27:28 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

>> IIRC, the sergeant at arms’ authority no longer extends beyond the curb of Capitol Hill.

Source?

>> Nor is there anywhere to keep her in custody. The Capitol Jail is not capable of feeding or keeping prisoners overnight.

Source?


46 posted on 02/27/2014 9:32:55 PM PST by Ray76 (How modern liberals think: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: onyx
 photo 597026cd-db1f-48f4-bc94-2ce427e1f06c_zpsd6d43012.jpg

47 posted on 02/27/2014 9:41:47 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
Source?

Don't have a source; it was my recollection. I did say "IIRC", didn't I.

If you're interested, feel free to check it out.

48 posted on 02/27/2014 10:00:51 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

bttt


49 posted on 02/27/2014 10:05:19 PM PST by Pelham (If you do not deport it is amnesty by default.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

>>> Once Obamacare death panels kick in.....and scaled for relative population size...that makes something like 750,000 euthanizing events a year in the USA.

He would just blame that on republicans.

AND he would get away with it.


50 posted on 02/27/2014 10:08:44 PM PST by Safrguns (PM me if you like to play Minecraft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson