Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Wheaton discussion of homosexuality [former lesbian speaks on college campus]
World Magazine ^ | 3/1/14 | Marvin Olasky, Philip Ryken, Amanda Morris & Rosaria Butterfield

Posted on 03/01/2014 11:28:56 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

Former lesbian Rosaria Butterfield found controversy and opportunity on her recent visit to a Christian college campus

Joni Mitchell sang, “I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now, from up and down, and still somehow, it’s cloud illusions I recall. I really don’t know clouds at all.” Rosaria Butterfield, a former lesbian and Syracuse University professor, has looked at homosexuality from inside and outside, and has not come away empty-handed. I learned a lot from interviewing her last year, and Wheaton College students learned a lot when she visited their campus in late January.

The visit was not without controversy. Below is a statement from Wheaton President Philip Ryken that reports what happened and explains well the college’s position. Following that are an interview with Butterfield published in Wheaton’s student newspaper, an excerpt and a link to a recent article by Butterfield posted at The Gospel Coalition website, and a video of my complete interview with Butterfield last year. —Marvin Olasky

Over the last few days, Wheaton College has been the subject of significant discussion following coverage of events related to a January 31 chapel talk by Dr. Rosaria Champagne Butterfield.

In the chapel talk, which is available here, Dr. Butterfield testifies about her encounter with Jesus Christ and how this transformed her life, including her worldview and her experience of her sexuality. In her talk, as in other venues, Dr. Butterfield described herself as a formerly leftist lesbian professor who had despised Christians. Dr. Butterfield’s testimony was well-received by the student body, resulting in an extended ovation following her remarks.

In advance of Dr. Butterfield’s talk, several dozen students held a silent demonstration on the steps of Edman Chapel to express an array of concerns about the possible implications of what they expected to hear in Dr. Butterfield’s message. As is her practice, Dr. Butterfield met with the demonstrating students later that afternoon. The demonstration and the conversation with Dr. Butterfield that followed have been covered in news outlets including The Wheaton Record, the student newspaper.

A key theme of the discussion around these events concerns the value of personal narrative as a way of pursuing truth and understanding. As a Christian community rooted in the universal and unchanging truth of the gospel story, we believe that all stories, including personal stories, must always be weighed using the balance of God’s Word. Our conversations as an institution are always rooted in biblical truth.

Wheaton College’s conviction on homosexual practice remains as articulated in our Community Covenant, which is affirmed each year by all students, faculty, and staff:

“Scripture condemns … sexual immorality, such as the use of pornography (Matt. 5:27-28), pre-marital sex, adultery, homosexual behavior and all other sexual relations outside the bounds of marriage between a man and woman (Rom. 1:21-27; 1 Cor. 6:9-10; Gen. 2:24; Eph. 5:31).”

Chapel guests and programs speak to various topics, including contentious issues of the day, always in alignment with the biblical standards outlined in the Community Covenant.

As our Covenant states, Wheaton College is a community of living, learning, and serving. We are a confessional Christian academic community with a focus on the spiritual and intellectual formation of our students. While we are not insulated from cultural conflicts over ideas, including our own students’ search to understand how the truth of Scripture shapes each Christian’s life, our educational model does not require us either to silence critical exploration of complex issues or to accede uncritically to cultural pressures.

Instead, the Christ-followers who lead this Christian liberal arts institution, and who value the minds and hearts of the students entrusted to our care, judiciously employ a variety of responses to student concerns and conduct. These responses may include personal conversation, civil public discussion, godly counsel, admonition, and discipline.

Within Wheaton’s historic commitment to biblical truth, as well as in our model of liberal arts education, our goal is to grow a community where questions can be raised, disagreements can be expressed, discernment can be modeled, and disciples can be nurtured.

Q&A with Dr. Rosaria Butterfield

By Amanda Morris, News Editor, The Wheaton Record, Feb. 7, 2014

On Friday, Jan. 31, Rosaria Champagne Butterfield came to Wheaton College’s campus to speak at chapel, addressing the topic “The Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert.”

Butterfield, who earned her Ph.D. from Ohio State University in English Literature, served in the English Department and Women Studies Program at Syracuse University from 1992 to 2002. Butterfield published a book, as well as scholarly articles, in feminist theory, queer theory, and 19th century British literature. Butterfield received tenure in 1999, the same year that she converted to Christianity. Butterfield, who now lives in Durham, N.C., with her husband and children, is author of the book, The Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert: An English Professor’s Journey into Christian Faith.

Butterfield’s visit to Wheaton’s Edman Chapel stirred mixed emotions from the student body, with many emphasizing that her story is one out of many in the realm of dealing with Christianity and personal identity. The Record had the opportunity to talk to Butterfield and get her thoughts on meeting with students and answering questions on identity. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

You go to both secular and Christian college campuses to give your speech on conversion. Are you typically met with some kind of opposition, and what is your response? Well, there’s nothing typical. … I’m sometimes met with opposition; sometimes it’s much more … vitriolic than what I met with at Wheaton, which really wasn’t a protest; it was a demonstration; and sometimes I am given a standing ovation. Each soul is different, each campus climate is different, and the cultural/biblical knowledge level is different. If I have demonstrators or protesters, I always ask to meet with people, and even if I don’t have people demonstrating, after a chapel message or an open lecture, I make sure that students know what coffee shop I’ll be at, and for how many hours, and I’ve never been alone.

You requested to meet with Wheaton’s administration and its students. How did that go?I think we met for almost two hours. Sometimes, when I go to college campuses, I’m thinking, “Lord, why, really, am I here?” And when I finally met with the demonstrators, I really believe that that meeting was why I was there, for a couple of reasons. The first is, this is a hard topic—it’s a topic filled with shame and vitriol and fear and a lived experience of pain and violence, so it is not an easy topic. And even among believers, it is very important to take the hand of the suffering and put it in the hands of the Savior. You cannot do that unless you get close to the people that get hurt. So often, we like to turn the gospel into this sneaky little worldview raid, and it’s not that, it never was that. Part of why I love to meet with people who think differently than I do is because iron sharpens iron. … As an intellectual, it’s delightful to be in the company of people who think differently than I do, but also because, even though, in that room, I think very theologically different than, I’d say, probably most of the people—at least the people speaking there. We all struggle in the same way—we’re all human. So, it was good to do that. Some of the things we talked about were hard things. I come from an orthodox Christian conservative perspective and I believe in the integrity and the authority of the Bible, and the syllogism that we use to describe what is true determines what is valuable and what is ethical. People who come from a revisionist perspective would say what is valuable and ethical determines what is true.

I shared my beliefs that … taking my stance from the inerrancy and the inspiration of the Bible maintains that homosexuality is a sin, but so is homophobia. The sin of homosexuality is really misunderstood. I shared my beliefs that it simply is part of the general package of original sin, that we are all born that way, nobody’s different, and that is a very big cross to bear. In response, students shared with me that they did not feel that way. … They believe that passages are mistranslated and misunderstood, and they believed firmly that there’s a legitimate Christian position to be held in a gay-affirming way. And so, that’s where we left that. 

Students also had questions about my positions today about feminism, and so we talked about how I do believe that women should have equal pay for equal work … same access to education and the rights and the goods, and then I also believe that feminism was a historical materialist worldview and Christianity a supernatural one, and I do not believe that [male] headship is a post-fall reality; I believe that it was a pre-fall reality and therefore not a sin. Now, is patriarchal abuse a sin? Of course, no question! 

They had a number of suggestions for me on how I could, in many ways, improve my presentation. I was very thankful for them. We talked about whether sexual orientation is fixed or fluid and we disagreed on that. It was intense. We also talked about some issues on campus that desperately and immediately need to be rectified, and while I can’t go into what those issues were, I really hope that the students felt my advocacy for them. So, we probably covered more in an hour and 45 minutes than I would normally cover in a year.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: chicago; christiancolleges; god; homosexualagenda; illinois; sexuality; truth
This woman was a MILITANT lesbian....

Rush would call her a feminazi....but the love of Jesus changed her, and now she is trying to show others the light.

Pray for her and pray for our nation.

I will post a link to an interview with her from youtube on another thread.

1 posted on 03/01/2014 11:28:56 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Interesting perspectives. Candid and analytical. I am sure she will be dismissed out of hand accordingly.

2 posted on 03/01/2014 11:47:29 AM PST by Psalm 144 (1. Sow. 2. Reap. 3. Eat the result.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Deu 12:21    If the place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put his name there be too far from thee, then thou shalt kill of thy herd and of thy flock, which the LORD hath given thee, as I have commanded thee, and thou shalt eat in thy gates whatsoever thy soul lusteth after. Deu 12:22    Even as the roebuck and the hart is eaten, so thou shalt eat them: the unclean and the clean shall eat of them alike. Deu 12:23    Only be sure that thou eat not the blood: for the blood is the life; and thou mayest not eat the life with the flesh.
3 posted on 03/01/2014 11:52:59 AM PST by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

so, now I know of 3 former lesbians in public life.

This woman.

The wife of NY mayor Bill de Blasio

The actress Anne Heche.

We are told that homosexuality is not a choice, and Lady Gaga sings/lectures us that they are born that way.

The point is, nobody really knows for sure what causes homosexuality. I don’t know if it’s a choice for some people, or what it is. But Lady Gaga doesn’t know any more about this subject than the rest of us. Nor do the liberal militants at Human Rights Campaign or the ACLU.

Yet we’re told that we are supposed to accept that homosexuality is inborn, and it’s unnatural to anticipate anyone’s such orientation to change.

This debate reminds me of global warming, in that, in both cases, we’re supposed to have faith that the liberals are correct in their pronouncements.on subjects about which there are big unknowns.

4 posted on 03/01/2014 12:23:47 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Liberals say you can’t be a former lesbian or gay, that you’re born that way. But, you can be a transgendered heterosexual,so why can’t you be a transgendered homosexual? Maybe lesbians and gays are really straights trying to break out of their homosexual bodies.

5 posted on 03/01/2014 12:30:37 PM PST by FrdmLvr ("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in Benghazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

I don’t believe Anne Heche was actually a “lesbian”, I believe she used Ellen Degeneres as a stepping stone on her way up.

6 posted on 03/01/2014 12:34:31 PM PST by BBell (The Blue Dog is Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr

There are no “homosexuals” outside of people engaging in homosexual acts. The are no “adulterers” of “fornicators” outside those acts either. We are born into homosexuality, fornication, adultery, gluttony, pride, etc.and it is called original sin. It only defines us when we fail to resist it and repent from it.

Homosexual temptations can resisted and overcome just like any other temptation. Maybe the rest of should just state “we were born that way” ,since it is true, and give up trying to resist these acts? “Hi, I am an adulterer, I cannot help it. I was born that way.”

7 posted on 03/01/2014 12:59:11 PM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Less than $5k to go!!

8 posted on 03/01/2014 1:02:18 PM PST by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

Sin is natural!

9 posted on 03/01/2014 1:18:03 PM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I have read her book, Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert. It’s real and raw and is transparent of her emotional turmoil as she lets go of one life and embraces the love of Jesus. It is so well written and I highly recommend to anyone interested.

10 posted on 03/01/2014 1:23:22 PM PST by BelleAl (Proud to be a member of the party of NO! NO more deficit spending and government control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BelleAl


11 posted on 03/01/2014 3:31:33 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"Rush would call her a feminazi...."

I think not, Rush would call her an ex-feminazi.

12 posted on 03/01/2014 4:42:02 PM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Sounds like a “Pauline.”

13 posted on 03/01/2014 4:49:48 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

Well that would be true. That person could not help it at that point, having already stepped into original sin en masse with humanity. God, however, can.

We are not told a whole lot about the circumstances of original sin in scripture. But it was a collective action (”we sinned in Adam”) and it was after our creation (”God created man upright, but man has gone after many schemes.”) If we needed a detailed philosophical analysis before believing it, we would be hopeless.

14 posted on 03/01/2014 4:55:02 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

I was being facetious.

15 posted on 03/01/2014 7:43:35 PM PST by FrdmLvr ("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in Benghazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BBell
I don’t believe Anne Heche was actually a “lesbian”, I believe she used Ellen Degeneres as a stepping stone on her way up.

Amoral is probably accurate. If it feels good, do it.

16 posted on 03/02/2014 12:15:10 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: celmak

I heard Rush say, several times, that a feminazi is a woman whose main goal is to ensure that as many abortions are performed as possible.

17 posted on 03/02/2014 1:42:23 PM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins
"I heard Rush say, several times, that a feminazi is a woman whose main goal is to ensure that as many abortions are performed as possible.

So you think Dr. Butterfield is still pro abortion? I did not see in the article that she believes one way or the other that abortion is to be a valid option. On the contrary, it seems from her change to being an ex-homosexual and becoming a believer in Christ's salvation, she would logically change her position about abortion.

18 posted on 03/03/2014 6:24:28 AM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: celmak

I didn’t say that Butterfield is pro-abortion. My point is that she probably isn’t a feminazi, since I didn’t see anything about her being pro-abortion.

19 posted on 03/03/2014 6:47:51 PM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson