Skip to comments.Any Chance Bill Clinton Wants a Do-Over Since His Latest ‘Fan Photo’ Hit the Internet?
Posted on 03/02/2014 7:05:21 AM PST by mandaladon
When former U.S. President Bill Clinton was in Los Angeles for a pre-Oscar charity event, he paused to pose for a photo with two women one to his right and one to his left. Which isnt typically a big deal, but in this case his photo mates profession is raising some eyebrows.
Theyre reportedly prostitutes who work for the infamous Moonlite Bunny Ranch brothel in Carson City, Nev. (where that activity is legal).
The photo is posted on the Bunny Ranch Facebook page with the caption, Yea that just happened
Identified as Barbie Girl (left) and Ava Adora by TMZ, they attended the Unite4:Humanity event with Bunny Ranch owner Dennis Hof and porn star Ron Jeremy.
Sources close to those who ran the event said the prostitutes were removed from the party after the photo with Clinton was taken, TMZ noted, adding that others close to the two women said that isnt true.
It should be noted that its not clear if Clinton knew the identities of the women or their alleged employer before the photo was taken, nor if Clinton met Hof or Jeremy.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
In any other cosmos, this man would be labeled a predator and a creep. Because he was the President, he’s got gold-digging women and power-hungry little girls dripping off of him.
Dirty Old Man fits well...
And his hag of a wife thinks she is qualified to be President too. In any other world she would be a laughing stock.
Who wouldn’t pose with them two. “Can we get a picture with you?”. Sure.
Shoot. They look to me like they are getting ready to leave together, the price having been already settled.
Laz? Name This Sandwich! LOL!
It sort of looks like a photo bomb or a photoshop even. I’m not defending the dog just saying. But fun and of course predictable.
So finally we put the dots in a row and come up with Justin Beeber’s idol.
I din't want to be called a racist for correcting her.
Bill’s got a nose for this sort of thing. It comes by him natural.
Either one of those girls would kill him in bed.
I always maintained that the only reason he wanted to be president was because it made it easier to get chicks. Seriously.
Can I try? The BLT. We can change the words behind the letters for varying examples. :-)
The first time I looked at the picture, I thought there were 2 female impersonators posing with Aqualung. Did anybody do a Crocodile Dundeee to verify?
Nah. It’s gotta have the word ‘slick’ or ‘greasy’ in it, LOL!
It’s why he’s a democrat.
He’s a dope-smoking pop culture icon with an armed escort.
Guess which one I’m talking about...
I did a quick search on Bing for “slick” and “sandwich” and the first result was in....Little Rock, Arkansas.
Birds of a feather...
The Ozark Romeo strikes again!
Boy those girls are really slummin’ it.
The blonde has been around a long time. She tried but failed to be young looking
Pleasant thought. :)
All the women want him
All the guys want to be him
His new Kentucky squeeze is pretty cute:
1) Clintons own words show his often expressed innate hostility to, and utter contempt for, the core principles of the American founding:
``If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the governments ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees. -- President Bill Clinton, August 12, 1993
``The purpose of government is to reign in the rights of the people - Bill Clinton during an interview on MTV in 1993
``We cant be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans that we forget about reality. -- President Bill Clinton, quoted in USA Today, March 11, 1993, Page 2A, ``NRA change: `Omnipotent to powerful by Debbie Howlett
When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly that they would work for the common good, as well as for the individual welfare However, now theres a lot of irresponsibility. And so a lot of people say theres too much freedom. When personal freedoms being abused, you have to move to limit it. Bill Clinton, April 19, 1995
2) Clinton inevitably pursued his own political advantage at the expense of American interests and national security. Here is just one of many possible examples:
It is well documented that Clinton and the Democrats took illegal campaign money from groups and individuals tied directly to the Chinese Peoples Republican Army. It is therefore not surprising that In January 1998 Clinton went against the advice of then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher and Pentagon experts by lifting long-standing restrictions against the export of American satellites to China for launch on Chinese rockets. Not only did he move control over such decisions from the more security-focused State Department to the Commerce Department, but he intervened in a Justice Department investigation of Loral Space & Communications, retroactively enabling Loral to sell critical missile technology to the Chinese. Interestingly enough, Clintons decision was made at the request of Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz, whose earlier $1.3 million campaign donation made him the single biggest contributor to the Democratic election effort.
The result, as stated eloquently by syndicated columnist Linda Bowles, was that the Democrats got money from satellite companies and from Chinese communists; China got supercomputors, advanced production equipment and missile technology; Loral got its satellites launched at bargain basement prices . . . and the transfer of sensitive missile technology gave China [for the first time] the capability of depositing bombs on American cities. Incidentally, Loral ultimately failed to benefit from this permanent injury to Americas security interests: in July 2003, the company filed for bankruptcy protection, and in order to raise cash was forced to sell its most profitable business a fleet of communications satellites orbiting over North America.
3) On two occasions, Clinton used military action for the specific purpose of distracting the American public from the fallout of the Lewinsky affair:
On August 20, three days after Clinton finally admitted publicly to the Lewinsky affair, the news media was poised to focus on that days grand jury testimony by Monica Lewinsky. That same morning, Clinton personally went on national television to gravely announce his bombing of a Sudanese chemical weapons factory, and a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. It was the first time most Americans ever heard the name of Osama bin Laden. The factory bombing in Sudan killed an innocent night watchman, but accomplished little else. It later was proven that the plant was making badly needed pharmaceuticals for people in that poverty-stricken part of the world, but no chemical weapons.
Several months later, the U.S. Center for Nonproliferation Studies, part of the Monterey Institute of International Studies, stated: "...the evidence indicates that the facility had no role whatsoever in chemical weapons development." Kroll Associates, one of the world's most reputable investigative firms, also confirmed that there was no link in any way between the plant and any terrorist organization. As for the Afghanistan bombing, it failed to do any damage at all to bin Laden or his organization. Clintons action was accurately characterized by George W. Bush when he said right after 9-11: "When I take action, Im not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt.
Clintons pointless and murderous military actions did not make Americans safer that day, although they did destroy an innocent life, and for all the good they did certainly could have been delayed in any case. But they did succeed in diverting media attention from Lewinskys grand jury testimony for a 24-hour news cycle, which was the main point. So I guess, they werent a total loss.
On December 16, 1998, on the eve of the scheduled House vote on his impeachment, Bill Clinton launched a surprise bombing attack on Baghdad. As justification for this exploit, he cited the urgent threat that Saddams weapons of mass destruction posed to America, and the need for immediate action. Almost immediately, the House Democrats held a caucus and emerged calling for a delay in the impeachment proceedings. House minority leader Dick Gephardt made a statement: "We obviously should pass a resolution by saying that we stand behind the troops. I would hope that we do not take up impeachment until the hostilities have completely ended."
Conveniently, a delay so near the end of the House term would have caused the vote to be taken up in the next session when the newly elected House membership would be seated with more Democratic representation, thereby improving Clintons chances of dodging impeachment.
The Republicans did, in fact, agree to delay the hearings, but only for a day or two. Amazingly, Clinton ended the bombing raid after only 70 hours -- once it became clear that in spite of the brief delay, the vote would still be held in the current session.
Once the bombing stopped, Clinton touted the effectiveness and importance of the mission. As reported by ABC News : We have inflicted significant damage on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction programs, on the command structures that direct and protect that capability, and on his military and security infrastructure, he said. Defense secretary William Cohen echoed the point: We estimate that Saddam's missile program has been set back by at least a year.
Whether or not one buys Clintons assessment of that mission, it is difficult to believe that its timing was so critical that it required commencement virtually at the moment the House was scheduled to vote on the impeachment. I think the most reasonable conclusion is that Clinton cynically deployed US military assets and placed military personnel in harms way for purely political reasons.
4) Clintons reckless sexual behavior was a threat to American national security:
Clinton and his supporters have been very effective in persuading large numbers of Americans that the Lewinsky scandal was only about sex. But I see a bigger issue here, because Clinton is on record as saying that he would have done anything to keep knowledge of the Lewinsky affair from becoming public.
To me, that statement raises a very serious question: What if, instead of sending her recorded Lewinsky conversations to Ken Starr, Linda Tripp had instead secretly offered them for sale, say, to the Chinese government? Or to the Russians? Or even to agents of Saddam?
What kind of blackmail leverage would those tapes have provided to a foreign government in dealing with America on sensitive trade, security or military issues? One of the few things Clinton ever said that I believe is that he would have done anything to keep the Lewinsky affair secret. Given his demonstrated track record of selling out American interests for personal or political gain (and there are more examples that I could have cited here), how far would he have gone in compromising Americas real interests in order to protect his own neck when threatened with blackmail?
Pretty far, I believe. Equally distressing is the prospect Clinton might, in fact, have succumbed to foreign black mail on other occasions in order to hide different sexual episodes that ultimately did not become public. There is no way to know, of course, but I prefer presidents for whom such a scenario is not a plausible possibility.
And dont even get me started on the war crime in Kosovo.
WAR IN KOSOVO
During Bill Clintons 1999 NATO-led war in Kosovo which according to some estimates cost as much as $75 billion we bombed Belgrade for 78 days, killed almost 3,000 civilians, and shredded the civilian infrastructure (including every bridge across the Danube.)
We devastated the environment, bombed the Chinese embassy, came very close to engaging in armed combat against Russian forces, and in general, pursued a horrific and inhumane strategy to rain misery on the civilian population of Belgrade in order to pressure Milosevic into surrendering.
Why did we do all that? The US did not even have an arguable interest in the Balkans, and no one ever tried to claim that Serbia represented any kind of threat to our nation or our interests.
But for months the Clinton administration had told us that Milosevic was waging a vicious genocide against Albanian Muslims, and needed to be stopped. The New York Times called it a humanitarian war. In March 1999 the same month that the bombing started Clintons State Department publicly suggested that as many as 500,000 Albanian Kosovars had been murdered by Milosevics regime. In May of that year, as the bombing campaign was drawing to a close, Secretary of Defense William Cohen lowered that estimate 100,000.
Five years after the bombing, after all the forensic investigations had been completed, the prosecutors at Milosevics War Crimes trial in the Hague were barely been able to document a questionable figure of perhaps 5,000 bodies and body parts. During the war, the American people were told that Kosovo was full of mass graves filled with the bodies of murdered Albanian Muslims. But none were ever found.
BILL CLINTON ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
During the election cycle of 1992, George H.W. Bush lost his job after Bill Clinton hammered him relentlessly for having caused the worst economy of the last 50 years.
In fact, as CNNs Brooke Jackson has reported: Three days before Christmas 1992, the National Bureau of Economic Research finally issued its official proclamation that the recession had ended 21 months earlier. What became the longest boom in U.S. history actually began nearly two years before Clinton took office. See (See http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/31/jackson.recession.primer.otsc/).
By the same token, Clinton is generally perceived as having a stellar economic record during his own presidency, in spite of the fact that the economy was already starting to decline during the last year of his term after the stock market crashed in March 2000.
According to a report by MSNBC: The longest economic expansion in U.S. history faltered so much in the summer of 2000 that business output actually contracted for one quarter, the government said Wednesday in releasing a comprehensive revision of the gross domestic product. Based on new data, the Commerce Department said that the GDP the countrys total output of goods and services shrank by 0.5 percent at an annual rate in the July-September quarter of 2000. See: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3676690/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/t/gdp-figures-revised-downward/.
The good news is the county where I lived voted Democrat before he came into office. Many of those religios people switched parties because of the support D given to Hill/billy and for the last two elections all county office holders have had an R behind their name. Thank you BillyJeff!
He’s attracted to women who remind him of his mother.
This is just like the same picture of him taken
at that casino in Europe, except the girls were
better looking then. Need to post the two pics
side by side.
Clinton’s version of shopping for a stereo...
Feminists don’t condemn Clinton for his philandering - they LOVE him for it. Probably wondering if he would sleep with them.
Should a “gentleman” offer a lady a Tiparillo?
His mother, al Capone’s mall?
Great Historical Post!
Give him a pass on this one but there are plenty of others for which he should be vilified.
When ever Clinton poises with a cute woman, there’s always a peculiar look on his face that says, “Back on the saddle again . . “
Gee, a man has his picture taken with some pretty girls. Who cares?
Alison Lundergan-Grimes, democrat candidate for governor of Kentucky, recently appeared with Slick Willy at a fundraiser in Louisville. It was disgusting to see her fawning and hugging on Slick. I cannot believe that the voters of Kentucky, democrat or republican, will view Slick’s endorsement of Grimes as a positive thing. I hope the voters will remember the repulsive fundraising spectacle when Alison Lundergan-Grimes brings up the republicans’ war on women later in her campaign.
Money, Power, Control and hookers....
Oops! Make that candidate for U.S. Senator instead of governor.
Oops! Make that candidate for U.S. Senator instead of governor.
One name Grimes did not mention during her speech was President Barack Obama. In an interview with ABC News, Grimes was asked why Clinton is such a bigger draw. She answered that the 42nd president has been involved in this campaign literally since day one.
He is someone who has literally seen me grow up since I was 14 years old. And today having someone who has such a distinguished record of economic expansion
make this his first campaign stop of the 2014 election cycle, to endorse our jobs plan
I think it speaks volumes about not only the priority that Kentucky is, his commitment and friendship obviously with my family which we are so grateful for, but most importantly that here in Kentucky he is backing the jobs candidate, Grimes said.
Geez, the older he gets the more he looks like W C Fields.
"Ham and Cheesecake Sandwich" sounds about right for that photo.
The Current Resident will never have to worry about being photographed with two FEMALE prostitutes.
Thanks for that info. I think Lundergan-Grimes has made a huge mistake bringing Slick Willy in to help. At least I hope so.
Once a dog, always a dog.
The current strategy for unpopular Dems includes funding a libertarian to bleed Republican votes and win with a Clintonian plurality.
It would be ironic if she pulls that off.
It worked well in Indiana in 2012, the libertarian got 6% of the vote and Obama Joe Donnelly won. In the Virginia governor race in 2013 the libertarian got 6.5% and McAwful won.
I’m convinced the entitlement army can produce mid 40s percent of the vote no matter how bad the Dem candidate is.
She will have a good chance after the conclusion of our GOP circular firing squad finishes its work.