Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Declares War
Wall Street Journal ^ | March 2, 2014 | Editorial

Posted on 03/02/2014 7:46:36 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Vladimir Putin's Russia seized Ukraine's Crimean peninsula by force on the weekend and now has his sights on the rest of his Slavic neighbor. The brazen aggression brings the threat of war to the heart of Europe for the first time since the end of the Cold War. The question now is what President Obama and free Europe are going to do about it. --SNIP--

In the brutal world of global power politics, Ukraine is in particular a casualty of the Mr. Obama's failure to enforce his "red line" on Syria. When the leader of the world's only superpower issues a military ultimatum and then blinks, others notice. Adversaries and allies in Asia and the Middle East will be watching President Obama's response now. China has its eyes on Japanese islands. Iran is counting on U.S. weakness in nuclear talks.

The Ukrainians can't be left alone to face Russia, and the Kremlin's annexation of Crimea can't be allowed to stand. Ukraine must remain an independent state with its current borders intact, free to follow its democratic will to join the European Union and NATO if it desires. The world is full of revisionist powers and bad actors looking to exploit the opening created by Mr. Obama's retreat from global leadership, and Mr. Putin is the leading edge of what will quickly become a new world disorder.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: crimea; eu; failure; imgueagenda; putin; russia; soros; ukraine; ukrainecrisis; viktoryanukovich; yuliatymoshenko
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

1 posted on 03/02/2014 7:46:36 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Russia seized Ukraine's Crimean peninsula

2 posted on 03/02/2014 7:47:59 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Hussein obamar is all tough guy when it’s Libya or Syria.

I guess this isn’t a war on behalf of the muslim brotherhood so this isn’t of interest to him.


3 posted on 03/02/2014 7:48:28 AM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Homosexual-Activist-in-Chief has more important things on his plate.

He has an important meeting with Reggie behind the bushes on the back nine.

4 posted on 03/02/2014 7:49:25 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (If Barack Hussein Obama entertains a thought that he does not verbalize, is it still a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

A people who don’t maintain a military sufficient for self-defense have voted to be invaded. It is immoral for them to expect or demand that someone come and repel an enemy. It’s the ultimate bailout.

We should do nothing.


5 posted on 03/02/2014 7:50:25 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

In the brutal world of global power politics, Ukraine is in particular a casualty of the Mr. Obama’s failure to enforce his “red line” on Syria. When the leader of the world’s only superpower issues a military ultimatum and then blinks, others notice. Adversaries and allies in Asia and the Middle East will be watching President Obama’s response now.


This is the scary part of what is unfolding. What will the president do to restore *his* credibility? His actions could be a huge mistake and trigger unthinkable consequences.

Or he could just do nothing and let the USA decline into a footnote in history.


6 posted on 03/02/2014 7:51:30 AM PST by OwenKellogg (Fundamental transformation leads to lawlessness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

That cute, WSJ.

Now what army are you going to send against a nuclear power in order to seize it back? Or did you guys ever wonder why we never went to war against the Soviets for a host of other stuff?


7 posted on 03/02/2014 7:53:56 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
You don't know very much about history, do you?

Good thing the French goverment didn't take such a foolish attitude in 1781.

8 posted on 03/02/2014 7:55:21 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"The Ukrainians can't be left alone to face Russia, and the Kremlin's annexation of Crimea can't be allowed to stand."

Well, females and gays who want to be on the front lines, here's your chance. Good luck!

9 posted on 03/02/2014 7:55:54 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Very well stated! In its current form, this is a European problem at this point, and we have NO interest there. The danger here is if Putin takes all of Ukraine without a credible response from Europe. He may be tempted to go after a few more. Why wouldn’t he?


10 posted on 03/02/2014 7:57:27 AM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Good thing for us, not for them. The resources spent only hastened the French Revolution.


11 posted on 03/02/2014 7:57:51 AM PST by Dr. Sivana ("I'm a Contra" -- President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Yours truly, George Soros.


12 posted on 03/02/2014 7:58:34 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

These types of treaties to ensure the “protection” of some nation are NEVER a good idea.

Britain had one with Belgium in 1914. The lost hundreds of thousands of men for that.

Britain and France had one with Poland in 1939. Even more were lost and Poland wasn’t free until 1989.

We made this stupid promise when Russia was in chaos, broke, and not much of a threat. We made it to a nation that wasn’t remotely unified enough.

Sorry to say but the U.S. should not go to war for this. We are just going to have to prop up what’s left of that country with aid, and settle in for Cold War 2.


13 posted on 03/02/2014 7:58:59 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
And The Person Who Foresaw It All Is...
14 posted on 03/02/2014 7:59:29 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg

Obama never had any credibility of his own.The only credibilty he ever had came with the office,a legacy of much better men.The whole world now knows that he’s a punk gay community organizer,who floated into the job on a wave of white guilt.


15 posted on 03/02/2014 7:59:30 AM PST by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Putin doesn’t want Western Ukraine and they sure as hell don’t want him.


16 posted on 03/02/2014 7:59:31 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg
"Or he could just do nothing and let the USA decline into a footnote in history."

Well, he has been pretty open that he thinks that the US should atone for past perceived sins and be reduced to just one nation among many, nothing special about it.

17 posted on 03/02/2014 8:00:11 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

In the Budapest Memorandum The US, and UK guaranteed Ukraine’s safety.


18 posted on 03/02/2014 8:00:14 AM PST by swamprebel (a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

I don’t have the impression you read the editorial.


19 posted on 03/02/2014 8:01:03 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swamprebel

Just like Poland in the early 20th century.


20 posted on 03/02/2014 8:01:21 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson