Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA finalizes Tier 3 motor fuel, other requirements
Oil & Gas Journal ^ | 03/03/2014 | Nick Snow

Posted on 03/03/2014 11:56:29 AM PST by thackney

The US Environmental Protection Agency issued final Tier 3 emissions control requirements for motor fuels and vehicles to meet by Jan. 1, 2017. The regulations address one major concern from refiners by keeping sulfur limits per gallon at existing levels, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said.

“Frankly, what [the American Petroleum Institute] and others were relying on was an outdated estimate based on what they thought we’d propose, not what we actually proposed let alone what we actually put in the regulation following public hearings and extensive public comments,” McCarthy said during a Mar. 4 teleconference.

“The per gallon sulfur cap will remain at existing levels,” McCarthy stated, adding, “I think folks need to take a close look at what we’ve actually done.”

The regulations include provisions to help refiners meet the requirement to reduce gasoline sulfur levels to 10 ppm from 30 ppm by 2017, she continued. “We listened very closely to small refiners and delayed the start date for 30 of them until 2020 because it’s important for them to be able to keep operating and supplying products for their customers,” she told reporters.

Other provisions include:

• A credit averaging, banking, and trading (ABT) program that will allow refiners to spread out their investments from 2014 through 2019 and provide for a seamless transition from the Tier 2 ABT program to the Tier 3 ABT program, including the ability to carry over “banked” credits from Tier 2.

• A 1-year deficit carry-forward provision that allows an individual refinery that does not meet the 10 ppm standard in a given year to carry a deficit forward for 1 year if necessary, as long as it makes up the deficit the following year.

• Hardship provisions which allow refiners to petition for compliance assistance on the basis of extreme hardship or extreme unforeseen circumstances.

The regulations also certified gasoline with a 10% ethanol blend and fuel that is 85% ethanol as test fuels under the program, providing additional certainty for refiners and automakers, McCarthy said.

She said EPA was doing more than standing by its estimate that Tier 3 requirements would add 1¢/gal to the cost of gasoline by 2025: It was reducing it.

“Based on additional research and comments, we estimate this will increase costs for gasoline by about 0.65¢/gal and for new cars and light-duty trucks by about $72/vehicle by 2025,” she said. “In 2017, when this fuel is available, cars will be cleaner. It will provide an opportunity for automakers to use more efficient catalytic converters. The costs won’t be immediate, but gradually ramp up.”

The requirements also potentially will affect natural gas liquids plants, NGL and refined petroleum products pipelines, gasoline additive manufacturers, petroleum bulk stations and terminals, ethyl alcohol and denaturant manufacturers, and other basic chemical manufacturing and wholesaling operations.

Reiterate concerns

API and American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers officials reiterated concerns that the new requirements would be costly and unnecessary.

“This rule’s biggest impact is to increase the cost of delivering energy to Americans, making it a threat to consumers, jobs, and the economy,” API Downstream Group Director Bob Greco said on Mar 3. “But it will provide negligible, if any, environmental benefits. In fact, air quality would continue to improve with the existing standard and without additional costs.”

Greco said a study conducted by consulting firm Baker & O’Brien for API determined the new rule could require $10 billion in capital costs and $2.4 billion/year in compliance expenses, equating to a potential 6-9¢/gal increase in the cost of gasoline production. Another study that Environ did for API found the new rule would produce negligible environmental benefits, Greco said.

“We’re also concerned about the timeline of EPA’s new rule,” he added. “The rushed timeframe leaves little opportunity for refiners to design, engineer, permit, construct, start up, and integrate the new machinery required. This accelerated implementation only adds costs and potentially limits our industry’s ability to supply gasoline to consumers.”

AFPM Pres. Charles T. Drevna said EPA’s decision to issue the final Tier 3 rule “is yet the most recent example of the agency’s propensity for illogical and counterproductive rulemaking. Tier 3 not only lacks scientific justification, but in fact will lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions due to the greater energy-intense refining process required to reduce sulfur in gasoline from 30 to 10 ppm.”

He said AFPM was pleased with EPA’s decision to make E10, instead of E15 as was originally proposed, the certified Tier 3 test fuel. “Unlike E10, which constitutes more than 95% of all gasoline sold, E15 is not widely available in the market and is damaging to the majority of vehicles on the road today,” Drevna said on Mar 3. “EPA’s decision is the right choice because there is no market for E15 for one reason: Consumers don’t want the fuel.”

Ignored problems

He said AFPM met with numerous administration officials to outline problems with the proposed standards’ potential impacts and compliance schedule that EPA chose to ignore. “Tier 3 will provide little, if any, benefit, while increasing fuel manufacturing costs on the backs of American consumers,” Drevna said. “Like the Renewable Fuel Standard, [it] not only adds to uncertainty in the market and to potential supply problems, but actually increases greenhouse gas emissions.”

But McCarthy and others who participated in the teleconference said the new regulations provide the most economic and immediate air pollution reductions possible.

“EPA effectively has harmonized the state and federal agencies’ emissions requirements, which allows us to build and calibrate vehicles on a national basis,” said Mike Robinson, vice-president for sustainability and global regulatory affairs at General Motors. “We support lower sulfur emissions requirements for fuels because this is one of the easiest ways to reduce emissions.”

Hundreds of state and local air pollution regulators welcome the new requirements, according to George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., co-president of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies and director of the Air and Radiation Management Administration in Maryland’s Department of the Environment. “We know of no other strategy that can clean the air as cost-effectively as Tier 3,” he maintained.

The new requirements will achieve the equivalent of taking 33 million cars off the road in their first year, Aburn continued. “I can say we’ll never achieve air quality attainment standards without the Tier 3 program,” he said, adding, “It will reduce emissions within the necessary time frames at a reasonable cost. It’s particularly important because the federal government is best equipped to tackle mobile source emissions.”

TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechangehoax; corngas; energy; epa; ethanol; farmpimps; gasoline; globalwarminghoax; nannystate; refinery; tier3; ulsg
“The per gallon sulfur cap will remain at existing levels,” McCarthy stated,


They have made the requirement for Ultra Low Sulfur Gasoline. The price spike for diesel a few years back is coming to gasoline.

1 posted on 03/03/2014 11:56:29 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

All of this to stop global warming. Thank God it’s working.

2 posted on 03/03/2014 11:57:40 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Skyrocket! Public won’t be impacted a smidgen. Nope. Lot’s more than a smidgen.

3 posted on 03/03/2014 11:59:29 AM PST by rktman (Under my plan(scheme),unemployment will necessarily skyrocket! Despite the % dropping. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Let's Put This Baby To Bed!!
Less Than $932 To Go Green!!
Please Help End This Quarter's FReepathon

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

4 posted on 03/03/2014 12:00:02 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
All of this to stop global warming.

Actually they have a different excuse for this one. Not CO2 this time.

The Tier 3 standards include new light- and heavy-duty vehicle emission standards for exhaust emissions of VOC (specifically, non-methane organic gases, or NMOG), NOX, and PM, as well as new evaporative emissions standards. The fully phased-in standards for light-duty vehicle, light-duty truck, and medium-duty passenger vehicle tailpipe emissions are an 80 percent reduction in fleet average NMOG+NOX compared to current standards, and a 70 percent reduction in per-vehicle PM standards. The fully phased-in Tier 3 heavy-duty vehicle tailpipe emissions standards for NMOG+NOX and PM are on the order of 60 percent lower than current standards. Finally, the fully phased-in evaporative emissions standards represent a 50 percent reduction from current standards.

5 posted on 03/03/2014 12:04:25 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

by adding ethanol they lose what they gain in emission reductions from taking out the sulfur.

6 posted on 03/03/2014 12:09:38 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“Based on additional research and comments, we estimate this will increase costs for gasoline by about 0.65¢/gal ‘

I would like to kick a greenie’s ass every day until these laws are repealed! Starting with whoever wrote this law!

7 posted on 03/03/2014 12:17:01 PM PST by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

They won’t lower the sulfer limits as long as we need to prop up a communist Venezuela by buying its high sulfur crude.

8 posted on 03/03/2014 12:22:53 PM PST by null and void (<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

How does taking sulfur from 30 ppm to 10 ppm affect NOx, PM, and NMOG? I could see a primary impact on sulfur oxides.

9 posted on 03/03/2014 12:25:49 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

GM and farm pimps in bed with FEDGUV INC.


10 posted on 03/03/2014 12:46:56 PM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“The regulations include provisions to help refiners meet the requirement[s]”

What a great use of newspeak comrade. The regulation will HELP you meet regulation requirements. FORWARD

11 posted on 03/03/2014 12:49:07 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I’m concerned about what’s gonna happen when they figure out how to turn cows into efanol. ;>}

12 posted on 03/03/2014 12:58:06 PM PST by rktman (Ethnicity: Redneck. Race: Daytona 500)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney
“Based on additional research and comments, we estimate this will increase costs for gasoline by about 0.65¢/gal

“Somehow, “we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.”

Steven Chu, US energy secretary January 21, 2009 – April 22, 2013

13 posted on 03/03/2014 12:58:13 PM PST by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

No oil meets these requirements, just as with the diesel.

It requires additional capacity in hydrotreaters to remove more sulfur during refineries.

14 posted on 03/03/2014 1:06:38 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Tier 3 gasoline standards include more requirements than just lower sulfur.

15 posted on 03/03/2014 1:07:45 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson