Skip to comments.Sarah Palin Was Right On Ukraine And Obama
Posted on 03/03/2014 4:26:55 PM PST by raptor22
Arrogance: Mocked by late-night comedians and "experts" alike, Sarah Palin could see from her front porch that candidate Obama's response to Moscow's invasion of Georgia would encourage it also to invade Ukraine.
As the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes notes in a tweet, administration officials told CNN's Barbara Starr that the arrival of officers of the 76th Chernihov Storm Troops Division and their dispersal across key choke points in Ukraine, including Crimea, wasn't an "invasion" but an "uncontested arrival."
Whatever this Russian version of an "overseas contingency operation" is called, it was foreseen as the inevitable consequence of electing a president who believed America was the last colonial power and whose withdrawal from the world stage would get rid of a major distraction to his fundamental transformation of America.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...
OBAMA APPEASEMENT PING
The Governor-candidate was mocked by Romney’s surrogates.
Has there been an apology, yet?
The Cold war is over they said...
Wasn’t Bush president at the time? I know she blasted “Senator” Obama. Did she blast Bush? And what would be her solution today?
They’re too busy trying to shove her aside and making it look like Milt was the one who warned us all.
And the resulting uptick in PDS around here is pretty much to be expected as well.
Hopefully this time Jim kills it dead from the get go.
Sarah Palin was right about Obama. Remember it was she and Rush Limbaugh who were out front first in criticizing the Obama regime.
Gosh. The high priests of the church of academia were wrong.
Why would she blast Bush? He was a great president.
Here is the truth:
Bush was President during Russia's invasion of Georgia.
Bush proposed that NATO accept Georgia and Ukraine in the Spring of 2008.
Russia "invaded" Georgia in the Summer.
As the House of Commons said about Maggie Thatcher..."the Lady doth screech too much..." Maggie fixed hers...and then won.
But Sarah hung on to her screech. Too busy to fix it.
After all, those who love her, loved her screech.
But of course, she never got elected.
But she got rich...and kept her screech.;-)
Have fun with this.
And now we have Linda Gayham thinking Latvia is a Balkan state. Can we get someone competent like Palin out there?
OBAMA APPEASEMENT PING
Same as it was then:
"Drill, baby, drill!"
Your post is too screeching. Whiny even.
I love Sarah, but you Sarahbots are so much fun it's hard to resist.
Romney and his ilk see conservatives as their true enemies. They won’t apologize for attacking them.
Not sure what a Sarahbot is. You love her but you are not a bot? I don’t have a problem with her voice. It’s real.
When you crow, what accent do you have?
Some of what you say could apply to almost every female politican or public speaker. Women need to avoid sounding shrill (that’s just a fact) when giving speeches. They can, and probably should learn to speak in a lower register.
However, Sarah has no “nasal screech impediment” — nor does she have a speech impediment. She does have a regional accent — an accent that sounds perfectly fine to me, as someone who lived next door to Alaska for decades, and spent a fair amount of time there.
Sarah’s speaking patterns have become part of her brand — you betcha!
Another liberal heard from.
Something that would sting Russia without direct military confrontation such as bombing Iran
How very mature of you.
She would be a great president but she has to get elected by a majority (not just by those who love her).
She has a nasal screech...can be overcome in a matter of days.
So, yeah, I wanted her to win...not hang on to the past.
When you see a ‘conservative’ make comments straight from MSNBC...Pretty easy to tell what you’re dealing with.
Perhaps you can explain yourself?
Thanks, eCSMaster! Spot on!!
Democrap spin is right.
Either VSA supports 0bammy’s continuing indecisiveness, or he/she likes to jump onto Sarah Palin threads to bash her. Or both.
If you insist on using liberal criticisms, why are you surprised when you are seen as another liberal?
Pretty basic stuff. You admired you like winding up “Sarabots”. Don’t complain when someone returns the favor ;)
OBAMA APPEASEMENT PING
She has a nasal screech. How is it immature for me to want her to win and kill the screech.
Many folks from America have some speech quality that prevents their acceptance by the majority. Is it immature to want Sarah to win the majority?
I await your mature explanation.
Shallow people look for shallow reasons to complain. Hillary sounds like a banshee. Doesn’t hurt her electoral prospects. Explain that.
She could win, of course, but a little polish is required.
But you don't want that polish do you. You want to bask in your love of Sarah...to the exclusion of your love of country.
All Sarah had to do was adapt. Not lose her originality...just get rid of that nasal twang that made her sound so colloquial.
All she had to do was develop the quality of statesmanship.
We know she is original...but she would have had to represent the country (all of us) around the world.
I love Duck Dynasty...but Willie has no chance of becoming president unless he loses the Duck. Same for Sarah!
PDS? I have a better explanation, let’s call it the InTouch magazine Syndrome, or obsession with personalities and inability to focus on ideas.
Palin is a leader of ideas. Case in point: the Snowden case. As soon as it started, while everyone here and elsewhere focused on Snowden, hero or traitor, it was Palin who alone pointed out that this case is not about Snowden as about the government snooping on citizens and non-citizens as well. What this article and thread are about again is ideas, not personalities.
The PDS sufferers ought to just stick to their People magazine and Entertainment Tonight on the idiot box.
Not at all. But it’s funny how offended you get when someone jerks your chain after bragging about jerking ours. Why do you suppose that is? Can’t take what you dish out?
Easy solution. Don’t help liberals spread the asinine screech meme.
Leftists have no standards. They think Hillary is great because she is a Marxist.
Conservatives require a bit more.
If I am complaining, it is because I know Sarah could win and be a great president...but she has to polish the way she speaks.
Cheese and crackers.
It was required of Maggie Thatcher...why is it so wrong for Sarah?
She doesn't have to change noticeably...but develop a pattern of speech that matches her capability.
Yes, I know you love Sarah just as she is...but she can't get elected just as she is.
She is too much of a target for the Liberals.
She can overpower her enemies (which she must do)...it starts with developing a pattern of speaking that is true but still powerful.
The heart has no accent...it has only the truth.
Barney Fife might have had a spirit commensurate with that of Shakespeare. But it would have improved his chances immensely if he could have empowered his speech.
Sometimes that comes naturally (as it did with Churchill)...sometimes a little practice and training helps.
Jerk my chain all you like.
How easily offended might I be to post such stuff on a Sarah thread?
Takes more guts than you have demonstrated.
You just don't want the truth.
Sarah can win...but Sarah must adapt!
OK then lets look rightward. Explain how Lincoln and all pre radio/TV presidents got elected when most people never saw, much less heard them. Because ideas matter. And only a shallow idiot bases their vote on a voice.
Yea it’s gutsy in an Obama killed Bin Laden sorta way.
I want Sarah to get elected. How shallow is that?
You're just hoping for unicorns, rainbows and skittles...ain't gonna happen.
Sarah can win...but it's gonna take a change.
Your failure to see that might mean that you are the one who is shallow.
Open your eyes...
I don’t care how shallow or deep you are. That’s your business. But if you are going to help spread the same crap that led the fence sitters to fall onto the lib side, then don’t be surprised to get blowback.
Not sure why some people fixate on such stupidity when it’s ideas that matter. Not sure why some people seem intent to keep rehashing it either. But the stupid of it clearly burns.
In the latest promo ad for Sarah’s next Alaska series, it is readily apparent that she’s worked on her presentation. She definitely needs a bit of practice but the talent is there and talent will out.
That said, Sarah's ideas are indeed right...but it only matters if she can get elected.
And that is gonna take a little adjustment on her part. Singers need training and so do speakers.
It won't take much, but she needs to bite the bullet and go for Prime Time...cause she's not quite ready for it.
I don’t see any harm in her getting voice coaching at all. I just don’t see it mattering now.
I still believe she can make a comeback. I know it’s a long shot, but I wish she would try.
As do I. I don’t think it’s a longshot though. Look at that poll 2DV or someone posted yesterday. 70% support.
May be an outlier but even if it were, it indicates more than a little support. And thats with her off trail and largely out of view...while the attacks from the left continue unabated.
I think we have reached the stage that many former non supporters would vote for her just out of spite for the GOP and the left.
I’d take that. Wouldn’t trust them but I’d take the votes to get her in the first time.
In my opinion, Maggie is right up there with Churchill.
I believe Sarah could be even greater than Ronnie.
We need her but first she must win!
“The Governor-candidate was mocked by Romneys surrogates.
Has there been an apology, yet?”
Not on FR.