Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Tea Party’s Waning, Not Winning: It strayed from its original focus on economic issues
National Review ^ | 03/05/2014 | Michael Tanner

Posted on 03/05/2014 7:11:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind

As the Tea Party celebrates its five-year anniversary, many commentators are asking whether the grassroots anti–Big Government movement is still relevant.

In some ways, this seems a silly question. The Tea Party has been enormously successful in changing the terms of the national debate on issues such as debt and spending. And, while its favored candidates have suffered some high-profile defeats, it has also won important victories. The Republican midterm sweep of 2010 would not have been possible without its energy and enthusiasm.

Yet it’s also true that the Tea Party’s clout is waning. According to the most recent Gallup poll, just 30 percent of Americans have a favorable opinion of the movement, the lowest level in its history. This seems particularly unsettling when polls also show that the public still overwhelmingly supports the Tea Party objective of limited government. In fact, a recent Gallup poll shows a record 72 percent of Americans feels that big government is the greatest threat to the future of the country. Voters who feel that way should be flocking to the Tea Party in droves.

They are not.

Some of it might be a question of tactics. Americans tend to dislike confrontation from their political leaders. Certainly, things like the government shutdown tended to turn off some voters, especially when misrepresented by a biased media. The overheated rhetoric of some tea-party leaders may also drive away otherwise sympathetic voters. Calling every dissenting Republican a RINO or inferring that President Obama is some sort of crypto-Muslim Communist is not going to win friends or influence people. Some tea-party activists definitely come across as a bit over-caffeinated.

But there is also a more fundamental issue at play here: Is the Tea Party still the Tea Party?

Sparked by outrage over the Wall Street bailouts, the original Tea Party was motivated by an opposition to Big Government. The motto of the Tea Party Patriots, one of the largest and most influential groups, was “fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets.” The Tea Party’s core issues were the skyrocketing national debt and opposition to Obamacare.

Social issues were not part of the platform. In fact, Jenny Beth Martin, leader of the Tea Party Patriots told the New York Times, “When people ask about [social issues], we say, ‘Go get involved in other organizations that already deal with social issues very well.’ We have to be diligent and stay on message.”

In an April 2010 CBS News/New York Times poll, barely 14 percent of Tea Party supporters said social issues were more important to them than economic issues.

As a result, the group was able to build a broad coalition of economic conservatives — traditional Republicans, of course, but also libertarians, and fiscally conservative socially tolerant suburbanites who had drifted away from the GOP in recent years. In national surveys, roughly 40 percent of Tea Party supporters once described themselves as libertarian or libertarian-leaning.

These disparate groups might have disagreed about whether Adam and Steve should be able to get married, but they agreed that both Adam and Steve were overtaxed and being spent into bankruptcy by an out-of-control federal government.

But the Tea Party has drifted away from its strict economic-conservative origins. Yes, opposition to Obamacare and government spending remain priorities. But increasingly issues such as abortion, gay marriage, and immigration have become the tail that wags the dog.

Thus you now hear Judson Phillips, the head of Tea Party Nation, a group that once said social issues were “just not something that is on our radar,” denouncing gay marriage as “a freak show, involving 3 men, 5 women, 2 dogs, and a Bengal tiger.” Or Scottie Neil Hughes, of the Tea Party News Network, suggesting that women who have abortions should be jailed. And, during last summer’s congressional town-hall season, Tea Party Patriots was organizing not against Obamacare or raising the debt ceiling, but against immigration reform.

According to the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life, Tea Party members are now farther to the right on social issues than Americans as a whole or even the Republican party. For example, while the public now narrowly approves of gay marriage, Tea Party members disapprove by nearly two to one. The public is largely split on abortion, but 60 percent of tea partiers believe it should be illegal in all or most cases. Tea Party members are roughly 20 percentage points more likely than the general public to oppose a path to citizenship for illegal aliens. A majority of Tea Party supporters now say that their religion is the most important factor in determining their opinions on issues.

As a result, economic conservatives, libertarians, and anti-tax moderates are leaving the movement. Fewer than a quarter of tea partiers now describe themselves as libertarian-leaning. In last fall’s Virginia gubernatorial election, socially moderate suburbanites overwhelmingly backed Democrat Terry McAuliffe over tea-party favorite and arch-social-conservative Ken Cuccinelli.

The tea party has begun to look not like a broad-based coalition of economic conservatives but simply the most conservative wing of the Republican Party. The tent is getting smaller. As Steve Billet, professor of political management at George Washington University, noted, “The polls suggest that where the Tea Party has failed is when they tried to expand their agenda beyond the explicit budgetary issues, and got much more involved in some other social issues.”

It’s not as though the issues that first sparked the Tea Party have gone away: TARP itself may have been largely repaid, but the culture of crony capitalism behind it still thrives. Deficits are in temporary decline, but the national debt continues to grow and the unfunded liabilities of Social Security and Medicare continue to mount. Obamacare, if anything, is proving to be an even bigger disaster than anticipated. The need for a strong voice in opposition to Big Government is as great now as it has ever been.

And the Tea Party is far from powerless. It continues to tap into grassroots mistrust of the Washington establishment. Its ability to mount primary challenges will keep Republicans from straying too far from its agenda. But if it hopes to regain the power it once had to reshape the American political landscape, it should remember why it started in the first place.

— Michael Tanner is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and author of Leviathan on the Right: How Big-Government Conservatism Brought Down the Republican Revolution.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: irs; irsabuse; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-89 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2014 7:11:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I was apalled to find 10% of Republicans vote in the Texas primary. THAT is the problem.


2 posted on 03/05/2014 7:15:23 AM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Won’t be well received here on FR, but the guy is absolutely right. The Tea Party was very influential in 2010 because its message on taxes, deficits and government’s role in the economy resonated with a broad section of people. That is no longer the message.


3 posted on 03/05/2014 7:16:43 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Tea Party was never just about economic issues. It was and is about Constitutional liberty. Economic issues are just one facet of the threat spectrum.
4 posted on 03/05/2014 7:17:29 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

More GOPe hit pieces on the Tea Party from the water carrying National Review. Seems the Ones Cruz endorsed won or are leading in the runoff.


5 posted on 03/05/2014 7:17:56 AM PST by Mechanicos (When did we amend the Constitution for a 2nd Federal Prohibition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

^^^^
Count me in on that. I agree.


6 posted on 03/05/2014 7:18:52 AM PST by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Tea Party has been enormously successful in changing the terms of the national debate ...

That's big...

7 posted on 03/05/2014 7:20:44 AM PST by GOPJ ("Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), always currying favor with the press...."(nailed) - William Bigelow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Oh for heaven's sake. The original issue was those brave citizens sitting on the US-Mexican border with binoculors, working to stop the invasion of the US. The no-tax globalist corporate types took over and are in cahoots with the cheap labor crowd.

To get out the real "tea party" vote, a candidate has to be uncompromising about sending invaders home and keeping them out of the US.

8 posted on 03/05/2014 7:21:14 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rick Santelli started the Tea Party with his rant about the housing meltdown and taxpayer bailouts. See a link here:

Rick Santelli Started The Tea Party With A Rant Exactly 5 Years Ago Today — Here’s How He Feels About It Now

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/rick-santelli-tea-party-rant-2014-2#ixzz2v6OIZUTk

I still have my homemade sign I used at on of the first gatherings:

Taxed
Enough
Already


9 posted on 03/05/2014 7:22:44 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mechanicos
More GOPe hit pieces on the Tea Party from the water carrying National Review. Seems the Ones Cruz endorsed won or are leading in the runoff.

The judiciary candidates endorsed by Texas TP groups won their primaries, too. It's a long march.

10 posted on 03/05/2014 7:23:28 AM PST by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

“I was apalled to find 10% of Republicans vote in the Texas primary. THAT is the problem.”

You shouldn’t be so surprised here. The race was never real. It got overblown and turned into something it was not and never was. Stockman was a cartoon character and Stovall et al were no names with no foundation.

I am sad today that Cornyn is back in as Senator (and he will be) but I’m also sad that so many outside the state invested so much hope in this race which never was.


11 posted on 03/05/2014 7:23:59 AM PST by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Maybe from your experience or perspective.


12 posted on 03/05/2014 7:25:57 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mechanicos

You nailed it. Of course there are going to be some social conservatives in the tea party, but that is basically overlap. In general, they have focused on the big problem facing this nation: impending bankruptcy and all that will entail for the world. That is the big asteroid coming toward us at an accelerating pace.


13 posted on 03/05/2014 7:28:08 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

One of the things Democrats do very well is establish lots of niche/speciality activist orgs that draw individuals into the larger coalition by focusing on specific issues while still providing mutual support to sister organizations that are focused on different issues.

That’s exactly what we need to do. And understand not only is it acceptable and even desirable/beneficial for a Conservative Org focused on fiscal issues to say “if you want to talk about gay marriage or abortion my good friend in the next booth over can help you more than I can.”


14 posted on 03/05/2014 7:29:43 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

If it were just about economic issues, then the Tea Party would not be all that different from Occupy Wall Street.

Both born in raging anger over the Wall Street bailouts.

Clearly that’s not the case.


15 posted on 03/05/2014 7:29:59 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
Maybe from your experience or perspective.

I was in DC for the giant rally and waded thru a million or so co-Tea Partiers. The conversations I was in and heard were not about "my taxes are too high".

16 posted on 03/05/2014 7:33:36 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Immigration is not an economic issue?


17 posted on 03/05/2014 7:35:19 AM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

As I said, your experience.

I’m not saying that it has evolved into anything bad; I’m still involved with the Tea Party. But it did begin with the taxpayer bailout and economic issues.


18 posted on 03/05/2014 7:36:19 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
"That is no longer the message."
disagree..0'Muslim's Media Morons/Klowns; clouded our mssg./ideas, to me it has always been,
the "Leave Me Alone" party/movement..never about "this/that cr@p" from 0'Muslim's Media Klowns.

19 posted on 03/05/2014 7:37:43 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

Agree


20 posted on 03/05/2014 7:38:39 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

No, it’s a race issue.


21 posted on 03/05/2014 7:38:55 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I completely disagree. Just like everyone else, this guy is reading things into the Tea Party. How does he know they strayed from fiscal restraint???? Their original goal was to CUT SPENDING. They did not take libertarian positions on social issues. They probably had a mix of views on social issues. Some people who labeled themselves “Tea Party spokespersons” tried to leverage the brand to push their own issues, but there never has been a formal “Tea Party” that sets positions on issues. The Tea Party was an unorganized protest movement in the best sense of the phrase. It was average people who were tired of Democrats and Republicans spending like there was no tomorrow and then wringing their hands and looking at the floor when people told them they needed to cut back spending. This article is complete BS.


22 posted on 03/05/2014 7:39:02 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Its be fine if they won on the social issues, but we keep getting these embarrassing routs like over that recent AZ law and the birth control mandate play in 2012.

When your team keeps heading for the hills under massive fire its time to recalibrate and try a different attack approach.


23 posted on 03/05/2014 7:41:06 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'You can keep your doctor if you want. I never tell a lie ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
But it did begin with the taxpayer bailout and economic issues.

We'll have to agree to disagree on that. Santelli's rant galvanized some people but the movement predated him.

24 posted on 03/05/2014 7:42:47 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

You are correct. It is a battle against big government which is far bigger than taxes and bailouts. Inspired by the citizens revolt leading up to the revolution, it is about protecting our god given rights and freedoms, which extends across all spectrums. I can understand it not being overly focused on abortion but the current judicial attack on marriage and the immigration issue are front and center.

Also believe message discipline is important to success but not exclusion of any issue outside of taxes and spending.


25 posted on 03/05/2014 7:50:21 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

that was one of the great sound bites ever. I watch CNBC in the late afternoon just to see what Santelli says, although most of the time its a more technical review of the market.


26 posted on 03/05/2014 7:53:55 AM PST by shepardspie33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FAA
As a Texan that tried to follow the senate primary as closely as I could, I will say that the biggest problem was too many senate candidates. They simply drowned each other out. The fact that Cornyn had so few ads played to his advantage. The quiet guy ended up being the loudest voice in the race so to speak.
27 posted on 03/05/2014 8:01:50 AM PST by tatown ("So a Hispanic shoots a black and is acquitted by women, but it's still white men's fault.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

According to the most recent Gallup poll, just 30 percent of Americans have a favorable opinion of the movement, the lowest level in its history. This seems particularly unsettling when polls also show that the public still overwhelmingly supports the Tea Party objective of limited government. In fact, a recent Gallup poll shows a record 72 percent of Americans feels that big government is the greatest threat to the future of the country. Voters who feel that way should be flocking to the Tea Party in droves.

They are not.


The label means nothing. All that matters is that the people support candidates who uphold the principles.


28 posted on 03/05/2014 8:02:52 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mechanicos

Here in Kaufman County the Tea Party candidates ALL either won out right or will be in the run-off in May. That includes TWO State seats - one Senator and one Representative.


29 posted on 03/05/2014 8:04:07 AM PST by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is a tendency on this site for some folks to think their opinion which may be on the extreme side of an issue is the majority opinion of the country—and to denigrate anyone who has a different opinion as some kind of false conservative.

I call it the Pauline Kael syndrome. She was an editor of the NYT who said,”I simply don’t understand how Nixon got elected. No one I know voted for him.”


30 posted on 03/05/2014 8:05:34 AM PST by wildbill ())
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

With all the issues related to Constitutional liberty, it’s like playing whack-a-mole for which one is at the forefront.


31 posted on 03/05/2014 8:05:37 AM PST by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Good enough. We all need to work together for the future.


32 posted on 03/05/2014 8:05:58 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"arch-social-conservative Ken Cuccinelli"

This from the "conservative National Review?

The short list of groups that want to see the Tea Party fail is:

Dhimmicrats

RINOs

Big Unions

Big Banks

Multinational Corps

Wall Street

The Chamber of Commerce

The ENTIRE Beltway media, including NR & WSJ

And of course the media/government complex

W/ this array of enemies its amazing, simply amazing, that we're still in the game.

33 posted on 03/05/2014 8:08:13 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NRO has gone down the drain.


34 posted on 03/05/2014 8:09:03 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (The Left: speaking power to truth since Shevirat HaKelim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shepardspie33

Sometimes in the AM they will get Steve Liesman to purposely irritate Santelli. Probably the network trying to improve their ratings.


35 posted on 03/05/2014 8:12:11 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: grania

“The original issue was those brave citizens sitting on the US-Mexican border with binoculors, working to stop the invasion of the US.”

No, the teaparty really got moving when Obamacare passed.


36 posted on 03/05/2014 8:25:59 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604; RedMDer; FReepers; everyone


RUSH:  You know, it's interesting to try to pinpoint exactly when the Tea Party began.  Now, the modern incarnation of the Tea Party as we understand it is a television phenomenon, and that was Obamacare.  Obamacare and the stimulus, the debt and the spending, is what motivated people who were already thinking in a different way. Some people might think that the Tea Party's origins really could be traced back to Clinton. 

There was a group back in the 1990s -- and they still exist. There was a group in the 1990s that were malcontents, renegades, and off the mainstream plantation of conservatism as articulated by the party.  Those were the people that were the early participants in the website Free Republic .  They were known as Freepers.  They were... I say all this in a positive sense.  I don't want any negative connotation.



37 posted on 03/05/2014 8:48:52 AM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One
^^^^
Count me in on that. I agree.

I agree too. Too many people here want someone who agrees with them 100%, and if they don't they would rather have a liberal communist, that someone who agrees with them 90% of the time.

38 posted on 03/05/2014 8:48:57 AM PST by sharkhawk (Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Oh yes, I enjoy Liesman vs Santelli. Sometimes they just let them go at it while the others just watch and chuckle at how much they dislike what the other says.


39 posted on 03/05/2014 8:52:05 AM PST by shepardspie33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

stand by for attack from the social(ist) conservatives in 3...2...1...


40 posted on 03/05/2014 8:53:16 AM PST by joe fonebone (a socialist is just a juvenile communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atlas Sneezed

That’s because they allowed the Liberals to define what the “Tea Party” is.

Once you let your opponent define you, it’s over.


41 posted on 03/05/2014 8:54:52 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
...five-year anniversary...

This kind of illiteracy--at NATIONAL REVIEW!

42 posted on 03/05/2014 8:59:32 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Rusty0604

According to the media...

Tea Party didn’t exist

Tea Party was just astroturf

Tea Party is racist

Tea Party is dying

We had some very large rallies that didn’t even extist according to the media.

We had elections won that didn’t happen according to the media.

Blah, blah, blah. The Tea Party is alive and doing well with people in office now fighting for the things that we as Americans believe in all levels of government.

The Tea Party helps to form national debate as well as local, statewide and national policies and laws.


43 posted on 03/05/2014 9:03:24 AM PST by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

you did not talk to me


44 posted on 03/05/2014 9:04:33 AM PST by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
B T T T ! ! ! ©

45 posted on 03/05/2014 9:07:52 AM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The republican insider meme has gone out to the media.

Cornyn “crushes”

Tea party “flounders”

Tea party “wanes”

etc. etc.


46 posted on 03/05/2014 9:08:30 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

this is the RINO BS of trying to split conservative into social and fiscal. Conservative is conservative there is no division.

This is about protecting the RINO staffers who are DC homosexuals.


47 posted on 03/05/2014 9:13:25 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

If the government has unlimited social objectives it’s a little difficult to focus on just the spending. It’s treating the symptom not the disease. Oh, and liberals have the ball, so it’s their agenda that we are paying for.


48 posted on 03/05/2014 9:21:36 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

I agree with you and the article. Most people can get behind the original, economic message of the TEA Party, but not when the social issues get attached. I have watched people who used to admire the TEA Party but now they are against it simply because of the abortion and gay issues. Now fiscal conservatives have lost an opportunity to take back some control from the liberals, and social conservatives gained nothing while weakening the influence of the TEA Party. Dumb, dumb, dumb.


49 posted on 03/05/2014 9:24:42 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: babble-on; Sybeck1
No, it’s a race issue.

Como?

50 posted on 03/05/2014 9:27:16 AM PST by Chuckster (The longer I live the less I care about what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson