Skip to comments.Bolton: ‘Our Biggest National-Security Problem Is Barack Obama’
Posted on 03/06/2014 9:23:28 AM PST by MeshugeMikey
With the Obama administration grappling with a crisis in Ukraine, former United Nations ambassador John Bolton took the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday and declared that the countrys biggest national-security problem is Barack Obama.
Bolton honed in on the terror attack in Benghazi, Libya, which he described as paradigm of President Obamas foreign-policy failures because the president has done nothing to avenge Chris Stevenss death.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Bravo, Mr. Bolton.
Especially when he and snake woman leak confidential information to our enemies.
The Ambassador was the payment for the
transfer of the 20,000 MANPADss to Obama’s MB/al Qaeda.
SOMEONE had to say it!! (I mean, besides the people here at FR)
Actually, I disagree. The real problem is the Democrat party. If it wasn’t Obama, it would just be another Democrat dipstick like Hillary or Biden or Kerry or Paleface Lizzy Warren. The Democrat party keeps electing dipsticks.
Foreign policy is so screwed up Bolton couldn’t fix it, even if he was given a chance.
I don’t always agree with Bolton...IIRC, he is pro-sodomite fake marriage.....
But HERE he is right on.
You just figured that out?
But as the Nobel Committee tells us, he is a man of peace. Or a Piece of ..... ?
Mitch, you are not Chuck Hesston. You could not carry his jock strap.
Wow, the turtle really looks like he means that too.
What a putz.
He is so gross. What a putz.
Hes taken his time in saying it thats for sure.
better now than never
Always stop what I am doing and listen to him whenever he is on FOX.
On a thread about Obama’s problem with national security, you bring up a Republican as a problem. That makes it hard for people to decide whether you are a conservative or a liberal.
Only the stupid ones.
If WE could get TV facetime....Obama never would have been elected to begin with.
He deserves Kudos!! yep!
Ahhhh......now there’s the answer. You’ve been caught, so now you start calling names. No defense of what you wrote, just start calling names. Your response unmasks you.
Double, triple, and quadruple ditto...
Huh? The "culture" and lifesyles we're exporting and glorifying are telling the world "anything goes". The US has become all about undermining what's worth saving and replacing culture with sensationalism and family values with "anything goes".
Culture belongs to those who preserve it. It'll be preserved in countries that continue to embrace religious and ethical values.
You may disagree with cc's style bu6, but don't be dissing his conservative bonafides, especially being a mere 2011 n00b. IMHO.
Yah, well, how many Republican or Tea Party candidates got the cojones to run an “Impeach Obama” campaign? Seemed to work for those whacko LaRouchies in Texas. So steal a page from that playbook, ya knuckleheads.
I disagree with you on this. The GOPe are a bigger problem, IMHO, because they do the rotten things the Rats would do, only they put a Republican brand on the results. We get the blame when the plane invariably hits the ground.
If Republicans behaved in a conservative manner, you'd have a good point, but they don't. Especially the one in the picture holding the muzzleloader.
Quit while you’re ahead.
This man should be SoS. Period. He knows his stuff.
Americans are woefully ignorant of the fact that the name Barack Hussein Obama translated into American means: Trojan Horse.
Trojan horse for every and all enemies of the United States.
I guess that until we are ashes under the feet of our enemies, it will not dawn on most as to who and what Obama really is and what he is doing.
Those that call him incompetent have no clue, or are willfully refusing to understand what he is and what he is doing.
Bolton: Our Biggest National-Security BREACH Is Barack Obama
Somewhere in Georgia, Jimmy Carter is smiling.
LOL ya caught me.
If you respond to the first post on a thread, then you are assumed to be responding generally. When you address your post specifically to someone further down the thread, then you are addressing someone particularly. Cripple creek addressed me specifically. I didn’t call him stupid. The thread is about Obama’s troubles with foreign policy. What does Mitch McConnell have to do with that? Cc made a specific comment to me that made no sense in relation to the thread. So, I pointed out that attacking a Republican on a thread about Obama on a conservative site makes it hard to decide if you are a conservative or liberal. It does. Not everyone at Free Republic knows cc and cc’s past posting history. He could very easily have started another thread about what a weasel Mitch McConnell is. I guarantee you, I would not have written him specifically with a post about Nancy Pelosi in reply. And I wouldn’t have used the word “stupid” in a flippant manner. While we all may not like McConnell’s voting record, how does bringing him up further the discussion on Obama’s awful foreign policy? It doesn’t. It detracts from the discussion. Whether he means to or not, cc’s post detracts and confuses the discussion about Obama’s awful foreign policy. It is like being in a discussion about The Super Bowl and cc joins in with a comment about how he doesn’t like his plumber. It might be true, but what does it have to do with the discussion? Most people would wonder where that comment came from and why he made it. Of course, a liberal would just make a comment like cc did to intentionally confuse the discussion. They do that all the time. It’s in their play book. And I don’t care how long he’s been on Free Republic. Our words speak for each of us.
Bolton is channeling my tagline!!
See post 40.
Indeed he is, and rightly so!
The Thousand Mile Security Breach.
The Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama
He’s a grinning evil SOB!
Were he 100 WHite...no one would have considered voting for him.
His skin’s melanin content remains the one worlder’s insurance policy.
we cant THINK BAD of a BLACK MAN....
there’s apparently a spine shortage In Washington D.C.
I was thinking more of America’s (past) role as a force of stability in the world. Yes, this has been eroding over decades but under this administration it seems to be going to hades on greased skids..