Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drbuzzard
If you don’t want to pony up the (extreme) money which the F-35 has boondoggled into, I’d just as soon grab a Grippen over the Rafale. I’d say it’s appreciably better bang for the buck.

Canada has long preferred two engines as a safety measure, given the severe weather and the fact that the sheer size of the country puts a lot of distance between airfields. That puts the Rafale one up on the Gripen. When the F-35 buy was announced that was one of the criticisms raised, along with the price and the fact that the darned thing doesn't work very well.

13 posted on 03/06/2014 3:17:21 PM PST by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Lower Deck

Didn’t know that, but it is a good policy.

Come to think of it the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet may actually be their best choice. It’s a rather substantial upgrade over the base F-18, shouldn’t be as expensive as the Rafale, and the crews should be more familiar with them. The Rafale isn’t really that much better if at all. They are both really generation 4.5 fighters.


21 posted on 03/09/2014 3:06:35 PM PDT by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson