Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good news Russia, China expanding their militaries (Even as we shrink ours)
Hotair ^ | STEVE EGGLESTON

Posted on 03/06/2014 10:34:16 AM PST by SeekAndFind

As the United States prepares to draw down its military to, if President Barack Obama gets his way, pre-World War II levels, countries around the world that do not exactly share our interests are building up their militaries.

First up on the build-up list – Russia. Even as Russia continues to occupy Crimea, and even as France is hosting talks to defuse that crisis, France began sea trials of the first of two Mistral-class amphibious assault/helicopter carrier ships the Russian Navy bought in 2011 for $1.6 billion, the Vladivostok. The Vladivostok is still on track for a fall 2014 delivery to the Pacific Fleet, with its sister ship, the Sevastopol (yes, it’s named after that Sevastopol in Crimea), due for delivery to the Black Sea Fleet in 2015.

The Mistral-class ships can accomodate 900 troops on a short-term basis along with a normal compliment of 16 helicopters. Ominously, when the Russians ordered the ships, GlobalSecurity.org noted Russian media quoted a Russian naval commander as saying the Mistral would have done in under one hour some of the tasks it took the existing Black Sea Fleet over a day to do during the Russian incursion into Georgia.

Meanwhile, The Christian Science Monitor is reporting that the Chinese have upped their acknowledged military spending by 12% to $132 billion.

China made headlines today with its annual military budget, up 12.2 percent to $132 billion dollars this year. That’s about one quarter of the $495 billion military budget that President Obama presented to Congress yesterday.

Predictably, official commentary here stresses that China is a peace-loving nation with no aggressive intentions. But Beijing has also signaled its ambitions to be the power that holds the ring in the western Pacific, and those ambitions have been spelled out, arguably clearer than ever before, in a direct challenge to US military preeminence.

China needs a powerful military, explained Fu Ying, spokeswoman for the National People’s Congress, on Tuesday because “if some country provokes or undermines consensus or even damages peace and order in the region, then China must respond effectively.”

Something tells me that, if the People’s Liberation Army, the People’s Liberation Army Navy, and the People’s Liberation Army Air Force had to pay the going rate the Pentagon does, its spending would dwarf the Pentagon’s.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; military; russia

1 posted on 03/06/2014 10:34:16 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well sure they would.

If you have the US military who can squash you at will, why spend dime one on a military beyond what is minimal to maintain your sovereignty.

With poofter Obastard drawing down, it becomes likely that if you build up, and use your military you will be able to keep your gains from aggression.


2 posted on 03/06/2014 10:38:08 AM PST by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The fools are wasting their money—Its the 21st Century, There will be no more wars! We have the UN and the Progressive Movement—Its the dawn of a new age! Our enemies are the Jews and the Rich white people! Give the Pasestinians a home and they will become peaceful—The money is needed to save the earth from Global warming and make it safe for all Gays. (Sic)


3 posted on 03/06/2014 10:40:04 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Russia and China really should spend more than we do. Sharing a long common border, they have to maintain large land armies to protect against the other. We don’t require a large army. Our fortunate geographical separation means we just need to maintain air and naval defenses.


4 posted on 03/06/2014 10:42:47 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Power, like nature, abhors a vacuum..................


5 posted on 03/06/2014 10:44:02 AM PST by Red Badger (LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If China’s and Russia’s neighbors aren’t increasing their military expenditures (and they aren’t), should we encourage their irresponsibility by making up the difference? We’re not the isolationists here - they are. And the funny thing is - our military dependents (aka allies) love to portray themselves as neutrals in a game between the big powers. If they want to be neutral, do we really have a dog in this fight?


6 posted on 03/06/2014 10:53:04 AM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Something is brewing and it’s no time to have a weak president and they know he is weak.


7 posted on 03/06/2014 10:57:18 AM PST by Vinylly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
...countries around the world that do not exactly share our interests are building up their militaries.

Why aren't the countries that do share our interests building up their militaries?

8 posted on 03/06/2014 11:01:36 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
Russia and China will be militarily aggressive for the remainder of our weak impost er in chief. Poland, Latvia, Quemoy, Matsu, Taiwan etc. will be in the cross hairs.
9 posted on 03/06/2014 11:14:55 AM PST by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Why aren't the countries that do share our interests building up their militaries?

Because Uncle Sam will provide. Why spend their own money on defense when they can fight their enemies to the last dead GI, and have Uncle Sam pay to fight their adversaries?

10 posted on 03/06/2014 11:38:42 AM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, Moo took the girls to China for Spring Break, on my dime, to brush up on their Mandarine. She’s obviously in the know. Maybe we need to brush up on ours as well.


11 posted on 03/06/2014 12:17:04 PM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinylly
Something is brewing and it’s no time to have a weak president and they know he is weak.

I give this country less than 2 years of existence left.
12 posted on 03/06/2014 12:35:23 PM PST by Old Yeller (In Latin, the word sinister means left. Which is appropriate for left-wingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson