If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
If we considered taking action, and didn't act, it's reasonable to assume we weren't going to take action, long range missles in Gaza not being an issue.
There is only ONE reason that the Ø regime considered “unilateral” action. And that would be to run-the-clock to the point at which the ship would reach a point where Israel would lose the opportunity for its “unilateral” action, at which point Ø’s “unilateral” action would go “poof”.
Kudos to Israel in calling this stalling tactic, now taking-credit tactic, of Ø.