Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CPAC to Palin: ‘Run, Sarah, Run!’
The National Review's The Corner ^ | March 8, 2014 | Eliana Johnson

Posted on 03/08/2014 5:44:57 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: flaglady47

And I don’t understand the GOPe’s desire to saddle this country with a DEM-lite candidate. When such candidates are run in my state, when the best that is offered is “me too” candidates, then it is a forgone conclusion that they will not win.

Since my vote would then be wasted, I use my vote to benefit the cause of conservatives (not GOPe). Thus, I vote third party which by the laws of my state, help with future elections.


81 posted on 03/09/2014 5:11:29 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

do not underestimate Sarah Palin. She’s proven the doubters, natterers, and naysayers wrong on too many occasions to count.


I second that...


82 posted on 03/09/2014 7:07:10 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol; MinuteGal

“I use my vote to benefit the cause of conservatives (not GOPe). Thus, I vote third party which by the laws of my state, help with future elections.”

LOL, yeah it really helps the cause of conservatives to live 4-8 more years under Hitlery and a Dem machine. There won’t be an America as we knew it, left by then. Help with future elections. What a joke. With Dems in control all illegal immigrants will be granted the right to vote, and Pubs will not win an election anytime in the foreseeable future. So you sure will be doing your conservative patriotic duty, oh yeah, as you doom your fellow Americans to a lifetime of servitude to the almighty socialist State.


83 posted on 03/10/2014 4:31:08 AM PDT by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

“Romney lost because when people who like big government handing them goodies have a choice between a real Democrat and Democrat-lite, they pick the real ‘rat every time.”

No, Romney lost because 3 million whiteys stayed home and sat on their *ss. Were you one of them?


84 posted on 03/10/2014 4:42:24 AM PDT by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Finny

“On the other hand, I have seen many who accuse others of being purists for declining to vote for more statism.”

What a joke. In your misguided effort to avoid alleged “statism” by a Romney Admin, you allowed a tenfold increase in statism under Obama. Real smart there.


85 posted on 03/10/2014 4:46:04 AM PDT by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Moorings

“Politically naive is thinking that you can bully, browbeat, guilt-trip, and blackmail people into voting for a distasteful candidate.”

You DID vote for a distasteful candidate. You, by default, voted for Obama. Great choice on your part.


86 posted on 03/10/2014 4:47:29 AM PDT by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Moorings

“I will bet that most of the 3 million people would take an “impure” republican over a liberal like Romney any day.”

Those 3 million people didn’t choose an “impure” republican or a liberal like Romney, they, by not voting, chose a very impure democrat, Barak Hussein Obama. There’s no impure Republican in office, there’s no “liberal” Romney in office, there is a dictator named Obama in office, and 3 million whiteys have no one to blame but themselves. You were probably one of them.


87 posted on 03/10/2014 4:50:32 AM PDT by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

No, I’m not one of them.

Romney lost because the only reason to vote for him was “I’m not 0bama”.


88 posted on 03/10/2014 5:46:13 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Or maybe they just said “I’m going to get stabbed. I’d rather be stabbed in the chest by The Won than in the back by Romney”.


89 posted on 03/10/2014 5:47:30 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“The age of Obama is almost over,” she announced. “This is the end of an error, he is the lamest of lame ducks.”


90 posted on 03/10/2014 6:29:14 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

“Or maybe they just said “I’m going to get stabbed. I’d rather be stabbed in the chest by The Won than in the back by Romney”.”

Then you are a fool. And you must love socialism/fascism because that is what you are getting with “The Won”.


91 posted on 03/10/2014 6:18:27 PM PDT by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

If the Dr. Suess family sues her over this, it only helps her, and us. Up until now, only us political junkies have been listening but if there’s a suit, the MSM won’t be able to resist it, and then a lot more people are going to hear her rendition.

It would be a “win,” even if she has to defend herself in court.


92 posted on 03/10/2014 6:43:12 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

You are making assertions not supported by the facts in evidence.

Blindly voting for progressive Republicans just because they’re Republican won’t get us out of the mess we’re in.

How would things be different if John McCain had won in 2008? Remember - when McCain “reaches across the aisle”, he’s reaching to Republicans.


93 posted on 03/10/2014 7:14:36 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Christie - I MIGHT hold my nose and vote for him. More likely to vote 3rd party.

Will not vote for Christie. Do not want to encourage that type of thing anymore. I may only have a few more Presidential elections in me and I don't want another RINO.

94 posted on 03/10/2014 7:19:53 PM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Obamacare vs Romneycare .... same difference. At least with Obamacare we can blame it ALL on the dems. We would not have been able to do the same with Romneycare and thus would have hurt ourselves even more.


95 posted on 03/10/2014 7:37:19 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson