Skip to comments.Breeders: How Gay Men Destroyed the Left
Posted on 03/11/2014 7:51:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Compensated surrogacy means that the carrier is paid to rent out her womb.
Between compensated and uncompensated surrogacy, we have a choice between baby-selling and baby-theft.
In jurisdictions that allow for surrogacy agreements, the carrier will be “bound” by what she agreed to and cannot change her mind.
This practice was banned in New York State in 1992, by legislators who stated clearly that there was no distinction between surrogacy and baby-selling. Details of the Baby M case that prompted the New York law can be found in this New York Times article, though you have to scroll down a bit to get to the particulars (and ignore the author’s propagandizing in favor of repealing the law).
Shouldn’t we oppose surrogacy in general, not just when gay men do it?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Thanks for this. I have noticed more and more in popular media the idea of using a surrogate becoming an accepted norm for couples who are unable to have a child on their own. The message is out there that doing so is an act of benevolence and without any ethical quandaries whatsoever. Look for its approval in a grade school Social Studies textbook soon.
Surrogacy? Recruitment? How else are faggies going to reproduce their numbers & preserve their culture? IMO they call straight normal people “breeders” out of sheer envy.
So, when will there be Breeder Pride parades?
RE: I have noticed more and more in popular media the idea of using a surrogate becoming an accepted norm for couples who are unable to have a child on their own.
This idea isn’t new...
In the Old Testament, Sarah, Abraham’s wife, was barren. She was promised by God that she would have a child in her old age... but she couldn’t wait.... After waiting too long, she decided to ask her husband to father a child by her maid, Hagar and adopt the child as her own.
The result of the union — Ishmael, traditionally the ancestor of the enemies of Israel ( till today ).
The opposite of a breeder is an extincter. Any species that does not breed becomes extinct.
Well, they used to be known as Saint Patrick’s Day parades, until the faggies invaded them in order to destroy their family themed celebrations.
The opposite of a breeder is an extincter. Any Sub abnormal species that do not breed becomes extinct.
Sarah (then called Sarai) gives Hagar to Abraham (then called Abram) in chapter 16 of Genesis. The promise that Sarah herself will have a son comes later, in chapter 18 (Isaac’s birth is reported in chapter 21).
I’ll be open to the argument for surrogacy just as soon as there are no more children rotting away in orphanages and foster homes.
Yes, a new slavery where mothers sell the child they give birth to, just as slaves were sold in the past. See the author’s final paragraphs.
All faggots really need to increase their numbers is better access to young children to sexually abuse. Democrats will find a way to help them.
To homos, the word “Breeder” is a pejorative of the worst kind. There is no word lower. Tells you something about their sickness.
In Genesis 15, here is Abram’s converstion with God:
2 But Abram said, Sovereign Lord, what can you give me since I remain childless and the one who will inherit, my estate is Eliezer of Damascus? 3 And Abram said, You have given me no children; so a servant in my household will be my heir.
4 Then the word of the Lord came to him: This man will not be your heir, but a son who is your own flesh and blood will be your heir. 5 He took him outside and said, Look up at the sky and count the starsif indeed you can count them. Then he said to him, So shall your offspring[d] be.
Either Abraham did not tell his wife about his conversation with God, or even if he did, Sarai ( Sarah ) might have understood “your flesh and blood” NOT to include her.
Be that as it may, it was still a case of surrogate motherhood.
Breeders keeping damaged DNA alive.
Hold fast to your faith in Christ (if you are a Christian) then raise your children right.
They also primarily recruit by committing unmentionable sins on children, and through the propaganda machine of the mass media (porn, promotion of the gay lifestyle, etc..).
Doesn't at least a dollar have to change hands for the contract to be valid?
And who, really, is going to do with without getting anything back in return?
its been very easy for the advocates and supporters of surrogacy to pass on that approval to the “gay” population as well, because the whole point of surrogacy is selfish in the first degree to begin with - it is to have (as in possess, as in this belongs to me) that which they cannot naturally obtain - a child, and in as much it also involves CREATING the child - making it come into existence, it, more than adoption turns human life, children, into commodities
to me it is selfish in the second degree, in that if one’s wish is really an UNSELFISH wish to give oneself as a parent, millions of children in need of ADOPTIVE parents wait all the way to their maturity never getting them
Something similar happens with the wives of Jacob. When Rachel is sterile, she gives her maid to Jacob and the maid produces two sons, Dan and Nephthali. Leah had had 4 sons already but gives her maid to Jacob and he has two more sons by her, Gad and Asher. Then Leah has two more sons and a daughter. Finally Rachel has two sons, Joseph and Benjamin.
‘But then came gay men. Somehow sexual orientation was jimmied into the triangle of race, class, and gender. Homosexuals were deemed an oppressed people despite the flimsiest of historical grievances (even the legendary gay Holocaust involved no more than 15,000 victims, out of the twelve million people placed in Nazi concentration camps).
‘Gay men were teased about their sexual tastes and had to face anti-sodomy laws, which made it hard for them to find erotic release. They had the option of lying to protect themselves. Living a lie is hard, but living a lie when you enjoy all the economic, racial, and patriarchal advantages of having to worry only about your sex life is hardly on the scale of Jim Crow, women not having the right to vote, or poor people starving during times of famine or unemployment. There is an enormous difference between systematic, large-scale persecution and simply facing barriers to sexual pleasure.
‘By casting gay men as powerless, the left sealed their doom. A new crop of allies possessing financial and social capital far in excess of people of color, women, or the working class was bound to rise quickly to power and take over the whole movement, mowing down everything in their path, including the sacred goals the movement began with.’
Exactly. Someone like Rock Hudson who enjoyed great success and power as in his career field was hardly in the same category as a Rosa Parks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.