Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama threatens to veto bill that would require administration to enforce laws
The Daily Caller ^ | 03/12/14 | Neil Munro

Posted on 03/12/2014 11:42:31 AM PDT by blueyon

President Barack Obama would veto a GOP-drafted bill that would allow legislators to take agency officials to court if they don’t enforce laws, according to a White House statement.

The GOP is pushing the bill through the House because Obama has repeatedly declined to enforce laws he doesn’t like, say GOP legislators.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda; corruption; obama; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
So I would think there would be screaming and outrage when a President does not uphold the law, yet all is quiet. Kind of like when gas was hitting $2.00 under Bush, everyone screamed and now it is over $3.00 and not a sound from the masses.............so odd.
1 posted on 03/12/2014 11:42:31 AM PDT by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Let him veto it. That will look great in an ad against his party.


2 posted on 03/12/2014 11:43:22 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Why would he bother vetoing it? It wouldn’t be enforced anyhow.


3 posted on 03/12/2014 11:44:29 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

“..So I would think there would be screaming and outrage when a President does not uphold the law..”

:::::::::::::

Ignorant masses, dysfunctional selfish Congress.


4 posted on 03/12/2014 11:45:06 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
"Let him veto it. That will look great in an ad against his party."

It would also look good on an Articles of Impeachment.

5 posted on 03/12/2014 11:45:50 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
"Let him veto it. That will look great in an ad against his party."

You bet. Let him go on record vetoing a bill that merely says he's required to the job he took an oath to do.

6 posted on 03/12/2014 11:45:55 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

What if he doesn’t veto it, but refuses to enforce it?


7 posted on 03/12/2014 11:46:33 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

The rule of lawless.


8 posted on 03/12/2014 11:47:05 AM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

On the other hand, he could just sign the law and proceed to ignore it... (like he does our Constitution and all our other laws)


9 posted on 03/12/2014 11:47:50 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

You wold think that someone would point out that this “concept” is not up to the political (i.e., let’s vote on it!) whims of the legislature or the executive branch.

I fail to find any clause in the consititution that provides for selectivity in either branch.

I say that a member of the executive branch that does not execute, uphold or enforce duly executed legislation is in contempt of congress and should be jailed on simple conviction.


10 posted on 03/12/2014 11:49:17 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I happen to agree with him on this one.

The Constitution requires him to execute the law. The bill is redundant.

The only thing that is missing is impeachment and demanding that the Congress enforce the constitutional requirements.


11 posted on 03/12/2014 11:49:17 AM PDT by EBH (And the head wound was healed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Washington DC should take the name of Crimea.


12 posted on 03/12/2014 11:49:30 AM PDT by FreedomGuru (Time for torches and pitchforks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Hairy Screed, (To quote another freeper) Won’t even let that into the upper house if it even gets out of the House of reps.


13 posted on 03/12/2014 11:49:54 AM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon; All
... that would allow legislators to take agency officials to court ...

Doesn't this indicate current RINOs are scared to use their constitutional power to impeach to impeach Obama?

14 posted on 03/12/2014 11:50:03 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I have an idea. IMPEACH HIM. Surely repeatedly violating the constitution is a High Crime!!! HURRY UP


15 posted on 03/12/2014 11:50:45 AM PDT by SADMILLIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Liberals never wanted a president who would enforce laws. They wanted someone who would seize as much power as possible to either overturn capitalism or at least prevent conservatives from having any voice at all.


16 posted on 03/12/2014 11:50:50 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Obama already took an oath to DO what this law tries to compel him to do,why does the House waste their time on useless votes,Impeach him for violating the Constitution,Defund Obamacare,they had opportunities to do these things and they wet their pants,tell Boner to take a hike and stop wasting time on useless stunts and do something useful


17 posted on 03/12/2014 11:51:13 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Article 2
Section 3: Presidential responsibilities
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

So this position must be more of the "fundamental transformation" he promised. So much for foundational law.

18 posted on 03/12/2014 11:51:42 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

“Obama threatens to veto his executive orders”


19 posted on 03/12/2014 11:55:12 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
King Obama's solution for any Congressional member
or American, who dares vote for, or demand
a bill requiring the undocumented KING to adhere to Law.


20 posted on 03/12/2014 11:55:39 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson