Skip to comments.Bill O'Reilly---Jesus Scholar
Posted on 03/12/2014 6:25:03 PM PDT by far sider
Did anyone else hear the Jesus scholar tonight? O'Reilly said that when Jesus was in the wilderness for 40 days and 40 nights, he "ate nothing but bugs and honey." So that's why Christians give up something for Lent. (He said it during the final segment: The Factor Tip of the Day.)
One would think the author Killing Jesus would know the difference between John the Baptist and Jesus.
What a maroon.
Jesus...John...both start with J. Hey, that’s how O’Reilly rolls.
Coming soon: “Killing John the Baptist”
Why doesn’t he just write a tome called “Killing Truth” and be done with it. Everything about him is a lie.
John the Baptist ate one specific kind of “bug”, that being the locust.
The skollah makes you hollah!
John the Baptist gave Jesus a head start.
You mean, “Falafel Scholar.”
Well, he was beheaded...
He also tonight espoused the incongruous position (in the same sentence!) that he’s in favor of raising the minimum wage “to help the folks” but disagrees with increasing paid overtime eligibility saying it will necessarily result in the loss of jobs in a “capitalist system.” Huh?
The folks at Harvard must clinch their teeth and sphincter muscles every time BOR mentions that he attended Harvard.
What a lunatic. Obama might be patriotic, but certainly not to the United States.
Yah'shua spent 40 days and 40 nights in the wilderness. OBTW Lent has been created out of whole cloth by the Roman "church". It appears that BOR's "ghost writer" is ignorant as well.
BOR is a slow child and is easily confused. shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
there is no reference to bugs, honey or carob.
Yah'shua and all of His disciples were Torah-observant messianic Jews.
Yah'shua spent 40 days and 40 nights in the wilderness.
OBTW Lent has been created out of whole cloth by the Roman "church".
It appears that BOR's "ghost writer" is ignorant as well.
Matthew 4:2: After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry.
In other words, He ate nothing.
When the O gets beat down he goes in panic mode and looks like a fool. He is wrong most of the time and can’t take it when he is exposed as a mindless fraud.
Drat, I missed him. I was watching my vcr tape of last night’s episode of NCIS.
He claims “authorship” but dollars to donuts, it’s the other guy who is writing these books - Bor is just the mouthpiece.
He claims “authorship” but dollars to donuts, it’s the other guy who is writing these books - Bor is just the mouthpiece-front man.
B.O. is just putting a new cover on old work. Name and city if you wish to opine, name and city if you wish to opine.
Are you sure? I took a look at one of his books one time and came away with the impression that this was written by a person almost totally lacking in insight, intellectual gravitas, and ability to write beyond the 10th grade level.
Sorry, my comment should have been directed to you, instead.
Ted Baxter strikes again. :-)
crazy yeah he mixed up john the baptist and the Lord.
BOR is no Christian. He thinks he can fool even God.
To be fair, I’ve heard Bill give his writing partner lots of acclaim and credit for most of the work, especially the research stuff. And more than once. Also he claims that most if not all the money from his books go to charity. Now that may or may not be true but I suspect it is true.
Agreed. Both BOR and Hannity are entertainers who found a formula for remunerative success. I believe, though, that Hannity would be a conservative even if he were a blue collar guy. Bill O’Reilly would be an annoying, hard to pin down RINO type.
Yes. Hannity is conservative. Ramifications seem to be too complicated for him, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.