Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/14/2014 1:15:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Boom, there it is, the call to move left. The leader’s call to defeat conservatism.


2 posted on 03/14/2014 1:21:38 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

November 2016 will for sure have a candidate for Homo Combos in the Democrats. Why must the GOP be same of this issue?


3 posted on 03/14/2014 1:25:26 PM PDT by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

You CAN’T be everything to EVERYBODY. The Democrats CERTAINLY aren’t and THEY have no problem getting elected.
If you don’t stand for something, you fall for anything.

Paul is right on most domestic issues, wrong on most foreign ones. Cruz is a better choice, but anybody is better than Hillary.


4 posted on 03/14/2014 1:26:40 PM PDT by ZULU (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; All
RP, your not presidential material
@ all, just a CINO..an liberal.
IF, the story is as reported..true.

6 posted on 03/14/2014 1:30:24 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

We don’t need to grow the party. We just need to take it over in the same way that the Marxists / socialists have taken control of the Democrat party and are now fixated on total control along with their fellow RINO travelers.


8 posted on 03/14/2014 1:30:56 PM PDT by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

A lot of people already had voted for Romney, what more does this kook want?


9 posted on 03/14/2014 1:32:32 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama won because of the “free stuff” crowd.

So how about we keep social issues and offer twice as much “free stuff”?

Not that I am for it but let’s see how Rand Paul likes that one!


13 posted on 03/14/2014 1:43:58 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

FURP!!


17 posted on 03/14/2014 2:25:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The place for social issues is not really as the political level in a society this far gone.

It's at the family and individual level. At the level of pop culture.

As long as a political party continues to tell people they can't do things that society is telling them is fully acceptable--the left will consistently have issues such as gay rights and the war on women to beat opponents over the head with. The change needs to happen in the society and culture arenas first or else you are fighting a losing battle.

I am not saying an alternative to Marxism party has to condone any behaviors but they should simply not address them. Refuse to engage. Don't play the game. When a leftie tries to engage me on abortion, I tell them it's a non-political issue for me.

19 posted on 03/14/2014 2:28:34 PM PDT by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Not one dimes worth of difference. FU DemocRat Rand Paul.


20 posted on 03/14/2014 2:31:19 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Rand Paul: Republicans must agree to disagree on social issues in order to grow the party

Sorry Paul but it is not about the Republican Party. It is about saving this Nation, about doing the right things. If we do not stand on the principles that made this the greatest Nation then this Nation will end...


21 posted on 03/14/2014 2:41:55 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I go to sign up for the American Revolution 2014 and the Crusades 2014?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If Rand Paul is a squish on amnesty, I won’t vote for him, PERIOD.

I will NEVER vote for a RINO, GOP or GOPe who supports “a pathway to citizenship” for criminal invaders.

PERIOD.


22 posted on 03/14/2014 3:01:42 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Then republicans will lose because moral voters sit home when given an immoral candidate.

If you do not understand that protecting the most innocent among us is imperative how will you protect the rest of us from anything(as proven over and over by rinos).

Your morals allow you to kill children. I will not vote for you.

23 posted on 03/14/2014 3:09:47 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Rand Paul just joined Paul Ryan on my dead-to-me list.

What Daniels and Paul are saying is that the killing of 57 million babies is less important than “fiscal issues.”

Daniels, in particular, was absolutely delusional. There is NOTHING that Democrats care about more than abortion. (And now, gay marriage.)

I have heard this called “The Episcopalian Dream.” It’s the Bush family’s view of the world. They have no beliefs, and they cannot begin to grasp that anyone else has any beliefs. If only we could Reach Across the Aisle more effectively! They don’t care about abortion, and they cannot believe that ANYONE—whether pro-life or pro-abortion—really cares about it, either.


26 posted on 03/14/2014 3:33:00 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

So Rand is about supporting law that forces the citizens to service, sanction, and support homosexual behavior??? That’s not libertarian, that’s Leftism.


30 posted on 03/14/2014 4:16:14 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Get lost, nappyhead.


34 posted on 03/14/2014 5:06:43 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Paul doesn't want Republicans to talk about social issues in public as he just wants allsocial conservatives as usual to just shut their yaps and do as the defeatist RINO's tell them to do and and to take whatever bread crumbs there might be left over and slink back under their rocks (his vision of socials).

Rand Paul, like his dad Ron Paul, and the other libertarian eggheads need to understand that many of us Christian Conservatives are no longer going to be their plantation slaves to lead around by our collective noses. Those days are long gone, at least for this CC.

This article is no surprise about the turn coat Randy Paul. He has been sending this signal for a very long time now. There is no way I'd consider him for President, maybe as a VP to help secure the moderate R's, but not for POTUS. He is deceitful and untrustworthy, IMHO. Oh, and he supports Amnesty.

56 posted on 03/15/2014 4:41:35 PM PDT by Ron H. (Ted Cruz for President in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson