Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. government to cede control of key Internet body
Washington Times ^ | March 14, 2014 | Washington Times

Posted on 03/14/2014 8:15:08 PM PDT by daniel1212

SAN FRANCISCO — The U.S. government is relinquishing its control of the Internet's address system in a shift that may raise questions about the future direction of online innovation and communications.

The decision announced Friday begins a long-planned transition affecting the stewardship of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN.

Although other countries have had a say in how the Internet is run, the U.S. government retained veto power over ICANN.

The Commerce Department hopes to end its ICANN oversight by the time its contract expires in September 2015.

Proposals for a new ICANN stewardship will be accepted beginning next week at a conference in Singapore.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americaindecline; antiamericanism; censorship; exceptionalism; icann; internet; obamaforeignpolicy; obamalegacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last
Another sign of the diminishing status of the USA, while the way it is heading now the liberal elite would seek to ban all negative opinions about the effects of homosexual life. And themselves.

But what country would be better? Uganda? Israel?

1 posted on 03/14/2014 8:15:08 PM PDT by daniel1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Why is the gubmint in the internet business in the first place?


2 posted on 03/14/2014 8:17:13 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Who exactly gave the Internet away? Was this a one-man job with just Obama or did Congress approve it?


3 posted on 03/14/2014 8:18:10 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

This is insanity, watch them give it to.....the UN.


4 posted on 03/14/2014 8:19:46 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

~~~Another sign of the diminishing status of the USA~~~

Yes, I’m rapidly-deciding the USA is too stupid to survive. Which scares me because I live here.


5 posted on 03/14/2014 8:21:21 PM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

“Ghana says THEY don’t like FR and Rush —they gotta go and our hands are TIED...!”


6 posted on 03/14/2014 8:23:22 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

“US guns means poor Mexicans are getting shot by narco-traffickers —gotta repeal the 2nd Amendment, SORRY..!!”


7 posted on 03/14/2014 8:24:10 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Only Al Gore can make that decision since he invented it.


8 posted on 03/14/2014 8:26:36 PM PDT by ImNotLying (The Right To Bear Arms: Making good people helpless won't make bad people harmless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
It's not the control of the internet. No one government controls the internet because it's not something in a box in a vault.
It's who manages and creates domain names like .com or .org. Now, instead of going to the US for domain names, people will go to ICAAN to register a domain name like .panic and .idontknowwhattheinternetis.
9 posted on 03/14/2014 8:29:55 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Obama: The first "White Black" President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

....and instead of the US getting paid for domain names...ICAAN will be paid.


10 posted on 03/14/2014 8:31:53 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Obama: The first "White Black" President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

So then if ICAAN doesn’t like website then it can refuse to register the name?Then what?


11 posted on 03/14/2014 8:35:58 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Trending to globalization..


12 posted on 03/14/2014 8:36:10 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tet68

and the freaks at the UN will want their cut or else


13 posted on 03/14/2014 8:38:41 PM PDT by molson209 (Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

This is upsetting to me. Something about it that just rubs me the wrong way. I guess I can envision how this whole thing could go astray.


14 posted on 03/14/2014 8:40:22 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Once the “stewardship” is in the hands of those who oppose freedom of speech and free markets, the Internet will slowly fade away into obscurity and be replaced.

This will be an interesting evolution.

15 posted on 03/14/2014 8:42:51 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Indeed. Meanwhile although i searched to see if this was posted already, i see it already has been: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3133335/posts


16 posted on 03/14/2014 8:44:52 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

And disallow others. .us already exists though (and is one of the cheaper ones).


17 posted on 03/14/2014 8:49:01 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

This is nothing, but selling of State secrets. Any one involved is a traitor.

The decline has happened.

We are at the bottom of the slippery slope.

What will we do?


18 posted on 03/14/2014 8:50:20 PM PDT by logitech (It is time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pox

What could be done is to form a coalition of free countries. Without the porn if possible. How much do we need from Muslim and Communist countries? We would miss all that comes from N. Korea though.


19 posted on 03/14/2014 8:52:39 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

The UN in control of the Internet? Unbelievable.


20 posted on 03/14/2014 8:53:58 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

We would miss all that comes from N. Korea though

Huge loss there, heh


21 posted on 03/14/2014 8:54:23 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Very HUGE. But i say that name with a heavy heart. I need to pray for them more. It reminds us of who evil men can be, and what false gods can do.

If there was no God to restrain evil, while allowing man to disobey Him, then the whole world would be like N. Korea, worshiping the devil in the person of Kim Jung un.


22 posted on 03/14/2014 8:58:22 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Bump


23 posted on 03/14/2014 9:03:23 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Before the establishment of ICANN, the Government of the United States controlled the domain name system of the Internet.
The original mandate for ICANN came from the United States government, spanning the presidential administrations of both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. On January 30, 1998, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce, issued for comment, "A Proposal to Improve the Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses." The proposed rule making, or "Green Paper", was published in the Federal Register on February 20, 1998, providing opportunity for public comment. NTIA received more than 650 comments as of March 23, 1998, when the comment period closed.
The Green Paper proposed certain actions designed to privatize the management of Internet names and addresses in a manner that allows for the development of robust competition and facilitates global participation in Internet management. The Green Paper proposed for discussion a variety of issues relating to DNS management including private sector creation of a new not-for-profit corporation (the "new corporation") managed by a globally and functionally representative Board of Directors.[citation needed] ICANN was formed in response to this policy.[citation needed], and manages the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) under contract to the United States Department of Commerce (DOC) and pursuant to an agreement with the IETF.
ICANN was incorporated in California on September 30, 1998, with entrepreneur and philanthropist Esther Dyson as founding chairwoman.
It is qualified to do business in the District of Columbia.
ICANN was established in California due to the presence of Jon Postel, who was a founder of ICANN and was set to be its first CTO prior to his unexpected death. ICANN formerly operated from the same Marina del Rey building where Mr. Postel formerly worked, which is home to an office of the Information Sciences Institute at the University of Southern California. However, ICANN's headquarters is now located in the nearby Playa Vista section of Los Angeles.
24 posted on 03/14/2014 9:06:28 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Obama: The first "White Black" President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

This is like ceding ownership of the Panama Canal to an entity controlled by the PRC. It won’t be a problem until it is critical, and then we are brought our knees. China takes Taiwan and suddenly the U.S. Navy finds it is not permitted to transit the Canal. Apple annoys the world by suing Samsung in 100 countries and the domain name apple.com is transferred to an orchard in Brazil. Someday, we will pay dearly for these actions.


25 posted on 03/14/2014 9:14:58 PM PDT by Kennard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

Yes. There will be consequences, part of which will be the type of solutions.


26 posted on 03/14/2014 9:20:48 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

It looks like the US is letting oversight of ICANN go to no one in particular, and letting ICANN create the group that it will be accountable to,...

.....cant be a government or intergovernment body, so it has to make up the structure and composition.... ‘of someone....’ to be accountable to ?????

What will ICANN do to consider the rights of anyone as this process moves forward? Will there be sound accountability going forward? If there isn’t at least some government to which we can petition to address grievances, then to whom to we petition for redress, the so-called “stakeholders”? Who will define them?


27 posted on 03/14/2014 9:50:23 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tet68

I hate to tell you I think that is the plan.


28 posted on 03/14/2014 9:57:07 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

They should let the World Court be the guv’nin body.


29 posted on 03/14/2014 9:59:38 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pox
CEO Fadi Chehade will get his wish:

....an opportunity to hand off control of the core of the Internet from the US government TO a 'variety' of involved stakeholders' from across the world.

I think what is important to focus on today is the trust in the global community that is displayed in the US' decision here," Chehadé told the press. "There is now full trust in the superiority of the multi-stakeholder model, the open model that enabled the Internet to be what it is today. That's the news today, really."

For his part, Crocker maintained that ICANN's transition out of US hands was a long time coming, and that today's announcement didn't have anything to do with Snowden.

So whoever then has the most invested gets the say?


30 posted on 03/14/2014 10:01:12 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) in a statement. ...

“It is also consistent with other efforts the US and our allies are making to promote a free and open Internet, and to preserve and advance the current multi-stakeholder model of “global Internet governance”.”

That is so chilling!


31 posted on 03/14/2014 10:05:46 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: caww
The primary thoughts that come to mind are “Taxes”, “Redistribution”, and “Censor”.

Anyone who didn't see this coming wasn't paying attention.

No matter, if it must die, then so be it. Something better will replace it that more than likely will not be controlled by any government. Bureaucratic control will only spur the desire for a free market type solution, IMO.

32 posted on 03/14/2014 10:06:50 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: caww
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) in a statement. ... “It is also consistent with other efforts the US and our allies are making to promote a free and open Internet, and to preserve and advance the current multi-stakeholder model of “global Internet governance”.” That is so chilling!

Naive, denying the reality of the Fall, as liberal minds basically do.

33 posted on 03/14/2014 10:21:04 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ImNotLying
Only Al Gore can make that decision since he invented it.

Give him the chance and he'll sell it to Islamists.

34 posted on 03/14/2014 10:24:38 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

“We have 18 months to find ‘new governance’ for a single Internet”, says ICANN CEO.

From the Silicon angle....Interesting as ICANN’S Ceo struggles with his own statements.....

http://siliconangle.com/blog/2014/01/10/icanns-fadi-chehade-says-we-have-18-months-to-find-new-governance-for-a-single-internet-or-else/


35 posted on 03/14/2014 10:31:19 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: caww

“Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) in a statement. ...

“It is also consistent with other efforts the US and our allies are making to promote a free and open Internet, and to preserve and advance the current multi-stakeholder model of “global Internet governance”.””

Freak globullist stooges working for the Enemy full time. One day they’ll get their “NWO”, only it will turn out to literally be ‘Hell on earth’.


36 posted on 03/14/2014 10:41:32 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

Muslims already had their pants in a knot over ICANN....

“ICANN’s handling of the .Islam and .Halal applications is at once an egregious assault on the new gTLD program rules, and a betrayal of whatever trust Muslims around the world might have had in ICANN.”

http://www.circleid.com/posts/20140303_icann_boards_decision_on_islam_and_halal_tld_applications_wrong/

Posters comment:

The GAC is looking for applicants to resolve irresolvable conflicts and in avoiding any hint of conflict is effectively giving narrow interests veto power in a number of strings.... Asking for ‘global validation’ in an extremely broad group of strings is essentially asking applicants to be able to do what governments themselves cannot begin to do,.... agree on a global standard for any of a number of classes of string.


37 posted on 03/14/2014 10:58:19 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: caww

Look for .Internet Caliphate soon.


38 posted on 03/14/2014 11:16:03 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer; Marguerite; melancholy; onyx
....”globullist stooges working for the Enemy full time. One day they’ll get their “NWO”, only it will turn out to literally be ‘Hell on earth”.....

I got to say there are working at lightening speed and in so many various International Groups people have no clue about...all associated with various nations governance's...but they are not in the limelight...they hold constant meetings and determine what and when things will happen and to do.

Following just one of them, who they engage with, and what they discuss, would more than astound people if they knew! It's amazing to observe their involvement and actions.

It's like this huge gigantic maze of people (like worker ants) operating worldwide and connecting with each other...under each Government's umbrella... All this to bring about nation changes, leadership changes,and resolving issues from various uprisings as they instigate them for their desired end.

Further these groups do NOT operate with the nation people's wills in mind...it's all about bringing every nation, it's resources etc. into this World Governance....and it's happening right now...not something to come...they are in full swing and have been much more so since Obamas election..because he's one of them and those in his administration he appoints. He gives no resistance and in fact in full cooperation.

I sincerely believe these people pushing all this do so to attain the positions, or close to the powers that this NWO will entail once it's announced it's in position.

A banker acquaintance told me it would take less than a week to get all worldwide banking under one roof of governance and they are currently doing so..which is why so much of our government money is sent oversees into the IMF and World Bank....not to mention our banks themselves. Most of it ‘laundered’ as something it isn't...helps for nations, doing for the poor. etc. when in fact it's slid right on through to the assigned destination.

None of these people are elected..they are appointed or given positions pending the organization/Government they serve....but the focus is always with the Global Agenda Push.

Unfortunately there are not many you can share these things with....our nation is in such denial and because they are so many disconnected from what's happening they think your off your rocker....which you can't blame them for the “theorist's” make it difficult for those who do have the facts.

39 posted on 03/14/2014 11:29:11 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Just another bomb to fundamentally transform this country.


40 posted on 03/14/2014 11:34:57 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

Yep....just the names of this ICANN made me blink! HA!

I believe the Caliphate is already assembled, at least who the leaders will be. Iran and Saudi have been slinging it out for years as each wants the “Royal Title”..interesting is Saudi’s new Ambassador recently visited Iran’s PM...when push comes to shove the Muslims will always temporarily set aside their differences when they see being united is gain for them all.


41 posted on 03/14/2014 11:34:57 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Pox

It’s going to be controlled by “stakeholders” from various countries....and they’ve been squabbling years about what degree of regulation standards will be set.

Who appoints these and where they come from remains to be seen...

I don’t think the Internet will die...perhaps fracture with various nation groups developing their own. But then that would defeat the purpose of fair trade etc.


42 posted on 03/14/2014 11:41:25 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: caww

Carter gave away the Panama Canal; Obama, the Internet.

The latter may prove the more egregious.


43 posted on 03/15/2014 1:31:24 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

They realize they cant control it so they will outsource the control. They think we’re stupid, well most are lokk at what we have running the show


44 posted on 03/15/2014 2:03:11 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (zippy the a##clown sez..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Because they invented it?


45 posted on 03/15/2014 4:29:10 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I can only envision real problems on the horizon if this does happen. Odumbo wants control of what all of us say and/or do (you know, that menacing thing called “Free Speech”, Yes, the one in OUR Constitution). Turning over control of the Internet (IMO) will circumvent OUR constitution and free speech as we know it will no longer be allowed. Could easily happen.

That is my theory (Tin Hat? Maybe)


46 posted on 03/15/2014 4:39:36 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

They’re setting the table and dishing out the tartar sauce.


47 posted on 03/15/2014 6:46:42 AM PDT by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Gubmint doesn’t invent anything. They controlled it, but did not invent it.


48 posted on 03/15/2014 7:03:56 AM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: caww
siliconANGLE » We have 18 months to find new governance for a single Internet, says ICANN | #MIT ECIR We have 18 months to find new governance for a single Internet, says ICANN | #MIT ECIR Ryan Cox | January 10th READ MORE inShare12 Fadi Chehade, as the President and CEO of ICANN, is frankly one of the more important people in the Internet world. His organization is responsible for two key aspects of the Internet. The first is managing the naming system of the Internet and how that system is used globally and how people reach it (ICANN manages the naming system through its policies and operations). The second is numbers. Specifically, any device that talks to the Internet (cell phone, smart phone, Mac, PC, etc.) is given a unique Internet Protocol or IP number, marking its specific entry point to the web. ICANN maintains the global IP numbering system. A single naming and numbering system equals a single Internet. Traditionally, ICANN has a function called The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) that is responsible for the global coordination of the DNS Root, IP addressing, and other Internet protocol resources. IANA is under contract with the U.S. Congress. More generically, that means that the U.S. “helps control” the Internet. However it was always envisioned that the contract between ICANN’s IANA and the U.S. would eventually go away. Chehade believes that contract with the U.S. government should in fact be “sunset”, and the time has come. Chehade believes that ICANN, who is accountable to the global community, should do so without U.S. government oversight. “The world is seeking and growing ever more anxious to see an independent, globally-accountable ICANN where no one government, no one organization, no one individual has oversight or rights higher than the others,” Chehade says. “I believe this is fundamental to the spirit of the Internet as well. Equal footing for all stakeholders engaged in the management and governance of this global resource.” So does this mean the U.S. has had more of a stacked-deck in its favor? theCUBE co-host Dave Vellante, Chief Analyst at Wikibon, brings up the fact that the power of U.S. companies like IBM (who at one point had two-thirds of the profit of the web), Intel and Microsoft show that the Internet didn’t level the deck as much as it was supposed to, right? Or have other factors lead to U.S. companies power? Factors like venture capital, Silicon Valley, competitive realities, technical innovation, agility, etc. Turns out it was the latter, Chehade says emphatically. There is nothing stopping great entrepreneurs from other countries taking advantage of the Internet. Fragmented internet would cause tension amongst nations The outcome of a more balanced adjudication system would not take away the power of the U.S. in Chehade’s opinion. A more balanced system would thwart the very real danger though, that the Internet becomes fragmented. It is Chehade’s belief that if that happens, there will be so much friction between countries and entities to do commerce and to exchange information that the cost of doing business on the Internet would go up significantly. How much of a cost increase? Substantial. Increased frictional cost would let the world down at the policy, economic and physical levels. “The current governance model was born from a reality that was based in the U.S. – the Internet has since become vital to the worlds economy, to societies, to the political life, to the cultural life of the world,” says Chehade. “Governance mechanisms of the Internet need to become equally global and inclusive. That can be solved two ways. One, any one from any stakeholder group who wish to participate in shaping the policies and standards of the Internet need to have easy, equal access and we (ICANN) must facilitate that. Two, everyone has equal access.” However, theCUBE co-host Charles M. Sennott, Editor-at-Large with GlobalPost sees contradictions in that line of thinking. “You’re saying on the one hand we cannot let the Internet fragment, but on the other hand we need to be inclusive and global — aren’t those two things running right into each other?” . “The Internet is many many networks – what makes it one is a logical layer on top of the physical layer,” Chehade answers. “That logical layer includes what ICANN manages, names, numbers protocol parameters. That layer has to remain strong and in tact, in order for the physical infrastructure to be unified before we get to the application layer and content layer. If we lose that, and suddenly governments decide they will create their own numbering or naming system. A country like China, would name introduce to the world a Chinese Internet route.”

From your link. What is driving this is the same false guilt over the USA being predominate in anything. Who invented the Internet? And enabled it to be a WWW? Then it should remain with them.

I think the Russians would have claimed the moon if they landed first.

49 posted on 03/15/2014 7:21:59 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: caww

Sorry, that was supposed to be just a few lines.


50 posted on 03/15/2014 7:52:46 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson