Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California GOP seeks return to Reagan blue (take back color, label the Dems as red)
California Watchdog ^ | March 11, 2014 | John Hrabe

Posted on 03/15/2014 2:46:38 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

At this weekend’s state party convention at the Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport, a group of influential California Republicans has an odd request for delegates: help turn California blue.

“Around the globe, blue is identified with conservative, free market parties, while red is identified with social democratic parties,” points out Shawn Steel, a former chairman of the state party who now serves as its representative on the Republican National Committee. “It is why conservative-leaning Democrats in Congress were called ‘Blue Dogs.’ Everyone knew what it meant.”

Steel is among a group of Republicans that have introduced a resolution calling for the California Republican Party to adopt blue as its official color in branding materials. The informal coalition of “Republicans, Red No More” says that it’s time to conform to proper historical and international standards for political ideology, correct a 14-year-old mistake by the mainstream media and, in the process, confront “the idea of a hopelessly divided nation.”

The group has some high-profile backers, including two members of California’s congressional delegation. “Should the Republican Party choose its own principles and symbols, or should we let the national media do that for us?” asked Rep. Doug La Malfa, R- Richvale, in an email to delegates. “Well, the answer should be obvious.”

(Excerpt) Read more at calwatchdog.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 03/15/2014 2:46:38 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; LdSentinal; ExTexasRedhead; ...

Given the problems our nation faces, this always struck me as minor, but maybe we should try to change the color scheme. Labeling us as red and our opponents as blue is not historically accurate.


2 posted on 03/15/2014 2:49:38 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The switch in colors was, of course, intentional on the part of the Left Wing Media.


3 posted on 03/15/2014 2:49:55 PM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy

When I saw this article, I immediately thought of you and decided to post it. If I ever visit your home town, you owe me a drink.

; )


4 posted on 03/15/2014 2:50:25 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Good luck with that. It will never happen.


5 posted on 03/15/2014 2:53:47 PM PDT by tennmountainman (Just Say No To Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Blue is the color of Mary the Mother of Jesus. I do like blue, but I like red better and green would even be a better color. I had a hunter green car in the 90’s. They no longer have green on cars anymore. Pity.


6 posted on 03/15/2014 2:53:54 PM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I was just talking about the color switch with a friend the other day. When exactly did the networks let the dems slip out from under their "red" identification ...and why?

( never mind. I guess the 'why' is obvious)

7 posted on 03/15/2014 2:55:48 PM PDT by Baynative (Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

This should have never been allowed to happen, but the Leftist media decided to get even with George Bush and switch the colors. We need to correct every media grunt who uses the “red” designation for the GOP.


8 posted on 03/15/2014 2:57:51 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

http://uselectionatlas.org/


9 posted on 03/15/2014 2:59:03 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

“When exactly did the networks let the dems slip out from under their “red” identification ...and why?”

It happened immediately after the 2000 elections. For years, the news networks gave the blue color to the incumbent and the red color to the challenger. In 2000, Republicans were the challengers for the White House. On election night, many noted that the nationwide vote was a near-tie, but the vast majority of state voted heavily for one party or the other. That’s how the labels began.


10 posted on 03/15/2014 3:01:13 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; napscoordinator

Long past time. Red’s Communist-Totalitarian. The color of every tinpot leftist worldwide. The color Democrats are afraid of being labeled.


11 posted on 03/15/2014 3:15:26 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

It can and it will. One person at a time on the right can simply stop using the media-approved Orwellian newspeak colors. They in turn can correct their friends on the proper usage and how and why the mislabeling occurred and the agenda behind it.

Red is DEMOCRAT. It’s that simple.


12 posted on 03/15/2014 3:17:31 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Two Shirley Temples it is.


13 posted on 03/15/2014 3:20:18 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Red is the Commies color- stands to reason it should be the Commiecrats also.


14 posted on 03/15/2014 3:26:56 PM PDT by patriot08 (NATIVE TEXAN (girl type))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I think today’s California Dems would think Karl Marx a Tea Partier....


15 posted on 03/15/2014 3:35:55 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

THAT’s their big idea?????

No wonder the GOP is eternally dead here.


16 posted on 03/15/2014 3:36:58 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
When exactly did the networks let the dems slip out from under their "red" identification?

The networks changed it before Clinton ran for president the first time. I remember having a "what the" visual jolt at the color change.

I figured they must have thought that Ronald Reagan looked so good with a blue background that they figured they would steal his secret to success, you know, because since he was so telegenic it must have been the color that got him two landslides.

17 posted on 03/15/2014 3:37:39 PM PDT by Slyfox (When Jesus sees a momma holding her little baby, it reminds him of his own momma.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

FWIW, the origin of there term “Blue Dog Democrat” was predominantly Southern, Conservative Democrats who had stood by their Party’s nonsense until they were “blue in the face”.

Color association with the parties didn’t play a role.


18 posted on 03/15/2014 3:40:52 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

what took so long?


19 posted on 03/15/2014 3:43:18 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
blue it is..

20 posted on 03/15/2014 3:49:38 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson