Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Billionaires With Big Ideas Are Privatizing American Science (focusing on white diseases)
New York Times ^ | MARCH 15, 2014 | WILLIAM J. BROAD

Posted on 03/16/2014 5:22:19 AM PDT by reaganaut1

...

American science, long a source of national power and pride, is increasingly becoming a private enterprise.

In Washington, budget cuts have left the nation’s research complex reeling. Labs are closing. Scientists are being laid off. Projects are being put on the shelf, especially in the risky, freewheeling realm of basic research. Yet from Silicon Valley to Wall Street, science philanthropy is hot, as many of the richest Americans seek to reinvent themselves as patrons of social progress through science research.

...

Fundamentally at stake, the critics say, is the social contract that cultivates science for the common good. They worry that the philanthropic billions tend to enrich elite universities at the expense of poor ones, while undermining political support for federally sponsored research and its efforts to foster a greater diversity of opportunity — geographic, economic, racial — among the nation’s scientific investigators.

Historically, disease research has been particularly prone to unequal attention along racial and economic lines. A look at major initiatives suggests that the philanthropists’ war on disease risks widening that gap, as a number of the campaigns, driven by personal adversity, target illnesses that predominantly afflict white people — like cystic fibrosis, melanoma and ovarian cancer.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: billionaires; playtheracecard; privitizedscience; science; whitediseases
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: exDemMom

I think people who read and believe the New York Times are among the most racist people in America. How could they not be? What effin’ crap this article is!


21 posted on 03/16/2014 5:52:14 AM PDT by duckworth (Perhaps instant karma's going to get you. Perhaps not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
> How about Oprah? Oprah's not doing as well as before:

Oprah Winfrey's Harpo Studios selling West Side campus

22 posted on 03/16/2014 5:56:34 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
I’m convinced that if cancer research had no government grants it would have gone the way of Polio.

I wish it were that easy. Polio was caused by a single virus, and it turned out fairly straightforward to make a vaccine for it. Cancer is a general term for a lot of different diseases with complex causes. We are making progress in the fight against cancer. We can prevent a few cancers and treat others, and the death rate from cancer has gone down. But finding a permanent cure or figuring out how to prevent all cancer is still a long ways away.

There may be a lot of money in research, and it is true that scientists are always asking for funding. But they are not getting rich from it. The funding goes for lab supplies, equipment, hired help, graduate students, etc., which are all expensive. People whose main goal is to get rich don't go into research. There are many other professions one can choose if one's main goal is to get rich, and none of those other professions is as difficult to enter as science. Getting a PhD is *not* trivial.

23 posted on 03/16/2014 6:03:07 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
American science, long a source of national power and pride, is increasingly becoming a private enterprise.

Because historically, so many cures have been discovered by government agencies, unlike private ones. If I can think of an example, I'll post it.

24 posted on 03/16/2014 6:04:23 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Science for CENTURIES was a private enterprise. Only the rich could afford the time and resources to noodle around with stuff.


25 posted on 03/16/2014 6:05:32 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
The problem as I see it is that university and government scientists are driven to seek funding, not solutions.

I know someone going for a doctorate in biology. To quote: "the key is to find something to research that costs less than your grant."

Yes, he's a liberal.

26 posted on 03/16/2014 6:06:21 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

If I remember correctly wasn’t Edison’s Laboratory and research center a ‘Private’ entity and so was Bell Labs, Westinghouse and others?

Really now, it’s only been since NASA came on the scene that the Government got it’s grubby fingers into the research ‘Pie’ in earnest. And now today private industry and the Universities look first to government to fund their research.


27 posted on 03/16/2014 6:07:48 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

“What? You didn’t know that Eli Whitney, Robert Fulton, Samuel Colt, Thomas Edison and Henry Ford were government employees?’

Well, it is plain to me that they were until the budget was slashed to the bone. My kids history book probably says that. How could our congressman be so uncaring by repeating history and cutting our budget today?


28 posted on 03/16/2014 6:10:17 AM PDT by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

My dad died of prostate cancer 2 years ago. It’s far from rare I believe.


29 posted on 03/16/2014 6:10:41 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MrBambaLaMamba
The poor should kick in and help.

Instead of sitting on their butts and doing nothing, maybe they could get a home chemistry set and start doing their own experimentation

30 posted on 03/16/2014 6:11:09 AM PDT by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

And the funding that they seek is all politically based.


31 posted on 03/16/2014 6:12:55 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
So they want less private research done... how long before they make it illegal?
And they want to demand that private research be done in accordance with their PC (read: racist) agenda, rather than the agenda of those who are putting up the money... how long before all research must be done after filing tons of red tape with useless in-house EEOC-type officials?

This is getting so tiresome that I'm almost eager for the shooting to start.

32 posted on 03/16/2014 6:15:27 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

The biggest problem with cancer treatment research is that some of the most effective treatments require lifestyle changes for the patient and don’t provide huge profits for the medical industry.


33 posted on 03/16/2014 6:15:57 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Private people will generally fund research into diseases that have hit their family members and friends. They will want RESULTS, preferably in their lifetimes.

And they will primarily give funding to the people who they think are most likely to produce results, without regard for "diversity" or affirmative action.

34 posted on 03/16/2014 6:19:48 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Yet another irony that the left decries Republicans cutting research dollars, then cuts real research even deeper in the name of subsidizing faux science.


35 posted on 03/16/2014 6:20:33 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

“Cancer is a general term for a lot of different diseases with complex causes.”

One problem, as I see it, is the metric the government chose; shrinking the tumor. So, treatments were developed which did that, but they only worked on a percentage of the continuous mutations. When the treatment wiped out the mutations it was effective against (causing shrinkage) only the mutations it was not effective against were left to multiply.

The government insisted on a molecular biological approach and only funded those efforts. Alternative approaches like treatments that prevented the growth of feeder arteries and veins were not investigated until recently. Some scientists urged treating symptoms rather than trying to kill the underlying mechanism as that is a moving target. They didn’t get government funding and the government is the only game. Survival rates for some cancers hasn’t changed since the ‘50’s, which would argue for a different approach.

I don’t accuse scientists of getting rich. But when I worked at a college lab they viewed grants as their job, not finding solutions. I’m sure there are dedicated scientists. But they must share funding with hacks who simply like university life.


36 posted on 03/16/2014 6:21:38 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
There are a lot of rich black people. Let them throw some money in. How about Oprah?

They can fund all the black scientists to work on black diseases.

37 posted on 03/16/2014 6:22:47 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Global warming exists because of government grants. Period.


38 posted on 03/16/2014 6:23:37 AM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Relax!
WIth Obamacare, only officials in the Federal Gov’t will have access to state of the art medical care.

The rest of you peasants have a “duty to die”, lest you deplete the coffers of the vote buying, entitlement programs.


39 posted on 03/16/2014 6:24:45 AM PDT by G Larry (There's the Beef!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

“There are many other professions one can choose if one’s main goal is to get rich”

I was at a wedding reception last night for a couple of Duke PhDs. They seem to be doing just fine moneywise.


40 posted on 03/16/2014 6:24:58 AM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson