Skip to comments.The Failure of Keynesianism
Posted on 03/16/2014 11:22:26 AM PDT by markomalley
Its hard not to agree with the old aphorism history doesnt repeat itself, but it does rhyme. Its nice to think we learn from our mistakes; yet we always seem to repeat them at some later date.
Reading the daily news, you would be hard-pressed to find mention that there is still an employment crisis unfolding in many industrialized countries. The New York Times recently reported that employers in the United States hired only 175,000 workers in February. This is apparently a cause for celebration among economists. The unemployment rate in the U.S. still remains at an historic high of 6.7%, and there appears to be no date in sight for a return of full employment, but no matter; the economy is supposedly gaining steam.
The only problem is, nobody seems to care much anymore. High unemployment is a constant reality now. Nearly six years of slagging job creation has created a cloud of apathy for most people. Its just accepted that not everyone who wants to find work will be able to; or they will wander from low-wage job to low-wage job without any kind of security.
The current economic malaise is reminiscent of what the Great Depression was like. Persistently high unemployment with no conceivable end; massive government intervention in the marketplace; a changing industrial landscape; and even social and cultural transformation. Were less than a century removed from the biggest economic hardship ever faced in America, and the same mishaps are unfolding in front of our eyes.
Then and now, something has remained perennial: the utter incompetence on governments part to cure economic stagnation.
Newscasters, state officials, and academic economists all tell us government is capable of spending us into prosperity. No matter how much dough is thrown at the glob known as the economy, large numbers of people remain out of work. During the Depression, the glut of joblessness lasted for nearly fifteen years. Uncle Sam spent like a drunken sailor while swallowing up much of the economy in fascist scheme after fascist scheme.
The very same thing goes on today, all at the behest of Keynesian-type political actors who provide the intellectual ammunition necessary to justify governments outstretched hand. With neatly obscure formulas and obtuse language, the apparatchik darlings of Keynes love branding themselves as deep-thinking scientists capable of engineering the perfect economy. When their policy is put to work, we get the opposite. Job creation stagnates, living standards slump, and misery spreads. The siphons of entrepreneurial growth dont pump; they are bogged down with the grimy sludge of currency manipulation and government hubris.
After decades of constant failure, I mean this wholeheartedly: the followers of the Keynesian school dont have a damn clue on how to fix the economy. Why my gauche phrasing? Their policy prescription is a complete and total failure. The Great Depression; the stagflation of the 1970s; the Great Recession we see today; in each instance, Washington was impotent to reverse the damage. Keynesians are either pathetically ignorant, or maliciously deceptive.
Taking rhetorical shots doesnt mean much without some evidence. So lets meet the Keynesians on their terms. First, economic science itself will be interpreted through the lens of positivism. That means data, in whatever form, will be used to justify whether something works or not. Of course the assumption will be made that spending is the driver of economic prosperity not saving or investment. The same goes for boundless money printing, which is said to infuse the animal spirits with a rejuvenating elixir.
So what have they got for successes? Keynesians used to tout the efforts of Franklin Roosevelt (not so much Herbert Hoover, who was proto-Rooseveltian) during the Great Depression as vindication for their theory. I remember being told in no uncertain terms that Uncle Sam stepped up to save the downtrodden from excess capitalism in my American Presidency 301 class. Sure, it wasnt an economics course; but its the same tale spun by economists anyway.
What does the data say? From 1931 to 1940, the unemployment rate never went south of 10%. From the onset of the Depression, Washington spending went up 97% under the Hoover Administration. According to the White Houses official statistics, the federal budget increased from $3.5 billion in 1931 to $13.6 billion in 1941, jumping in size year after year. A combination of deficit spending and tax hikes (admittedly not a Keynesian remedy) allowed for this gorge in consumption. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve goosed the economy by first stabilizing the monetary base and increasing the supply of money after the initial contraction during the Depressions early years. According to the Historic Statistics of the United States, the Federal Reserve increased its holding of U.S. securities from $510 million in 1929 to over $6 billion in 1942. During the same period, the central banks balance sheet went from about $5.5 billion to $29 billion.
Thats no small stimulus. And yet the unemployment rate failed to drop significantly during the Depression years. Most of Keyness disciples admit that nearly fifteen years of high unemployment leaves much to be desired on the part of muscular government. The counterfactual is then deployed that Roosevelts domestic efforts lightened the economic burden foisted upon America. What finally put the Depression to bed, they argue, was the incredible amount of spending during World War II.
But as economic historian Robert Higgs shows, measures of economic performance were highly skewed during wartime. Unemployment fell and production ramped up, but this was due to the draft and building of armaments. Rationing was widespread to the point where basic foodstuffs and toiletries were scarce. If a wartime economy counts as prosperity, then the homeless today are the living embodiment of luxury.
World War II is a bunk fantasy that in no way proves the Keynesian theory correct. The same goes for the fascist orgy known as the New Deal. Fast-forward to today, and the same charlatans are preaching from the gospel of government interventionism. They implore Washington to fight back against the Great Recession with the same blunted tools: spending and money printing.
When the housing bubble burst and the economy began to tank, then-Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke and crew nearly tripled the central banks balance sheet. As of right now, the Feds sheet stands at about $4 trillion. In 2008, it was at $800 billion. Not to be outdone, the federal government ramped up spending by running nearly-trillion dollar deficits year-after-year. Once again, all this effort has only made a slight dent in the unemployment rate.
From a strictly empirical perspective, the Keynesian theory is a disaster. Positivism wise, its a smoldering train wreck. You would be hard-pressed to comb through historical data and find great instances where government intervention succeeded in lowering employment without creating the conditions for another downturn further down the line.
No matter how you spin it, Keynesianism is nothing but snake oil sold to susceptible political figures. Its practitioners feign using the scientific method. But they are driven just as much by logical theory as those haughty Austrian school economists who deduce truth from self-evident axioms. The only difference is that one theory is correct. And if the Keynesians want to keep pulling up data to make their case, they are standing on awfully flimsy ground.
For those that may be new to this debate.
Fight of the Century: Keynes vs. Hayek Round Two
Keynes proposed something like “lifting ourselves by our bootstraps”, but with no point upon which to obtain leverage, we only succeed in pulling the bootstraps off the boots.
The Keynesian principle is somewhat like cutting two feet off the one end of a blanket, and sewing it on the other end, and then claiming “the blanket is now two feet longer”.
A bookkeeping trick, but there is nothing new added to grow the total coverage, and it only fools people for a little while.
Everything you need to know about ‘aggregate demand’.
Its not a failure. It was designed from the beginning by that homo pervert Keynes to transfer power and wealth into the hands of the Globalist Elites. To that end its been a spectacular success.
I like my economics in rap format.
It will work once we discover how to be inside the boots whilst we lift.
Keynesians and liberals alike, don’t understand how “Value” is added.
The endless capacity of human ingenuity to take a piece of wood, the skin and hair of an animal, the metals and carbon in the ground and turn it into something that advances the comfort and life span of their fellow Humans.
Everything we have and will ever have comes from the ground and our ability transform it for our benefit.
It’s ALL VALUE ADDED.
The pie gets bigger.
Obama Is Not A Keynesian, He’s An American!
Keynesianism has been proved wrong about once every decade for the past 100 years or so. No one seems to care.
We’re not even keeping up with the birth rate. Zimbabwe here we come!
Followed by what has been a continuous inflation sapping the income and savings of all through PROGRESSIVE TAXATION among other things. Keynes was an A$$!
Lots of young unemployed = lots of fresh cannon fodder for the self appointed elite to play global chess with. Take a look at the Russians propaganda machine that has geared up since New Years Eve.
Or maybe we are being too forgiving. When it is obvious to everyone, right down to those with a negative IQ (Socialists and Progressive and Democrats) that Keynesianism does not work, we really should look to reasons other than stupidity why they keep applying it. Could they be just pure evil and lust after the power and control that comes with its use. We are left with a choice - stupidity that is genetically random and unlikely to be 100%, or evilness which is a deliberate trait. I rhink that they are just plain EVIL.
“I think that they are just plain EVIL.”
All leftist thought, from the limousine liberalism of a George Clooney to the murderous horrors of Mao, Stalin, and Pol Pot, is of and from Satan. Leftism is a contaminant in the human cognosphere, not a natural component of it.
Satan is smarter than we are, and he never sleeps. Those over whom he has the most influence are like maniacally evil energizer demons.
Every once in a while one of them escapes, like David Horowitz, but who knows how or why?
So uh, what’s yer solution?
You haven’t scratched the surface and the criticisms are simplistic and juvenile.
Wats the alternative?
Author: “The current economic malaise is reminiscent of what the Great Depression was like.”
Ummm, really? The Great Depression had SOUP LINES with SKINNY/HUNGRY people lined up.
Now, we’ve got Obese, spoiled people who get their food stamps from the comfort of their social welfare subsidized homes with smartphones and flat screen TV’s.
“Now, weve got Obese, spoiled people who get their food stamps”
Do you have any idea how long the soup lines would be if they weren’t hiding it with food stamp cards?
As for “obese,” if they didn’t have to buy the cheapest possible crap, maybe they could lose weight with Avocado Provencale and Crepes Bengal.
“social welfare subsidized homes with smartphones and flat screen TVs.”
I’ve been hearing that for decades, and so I checked. Googled it and found the income guidelines. My Navy pension and disability don’t add up to squat, and what there was has been inflated away. Nonetheless, I don’t qualify for anything at all, even with two minor children in the house.
So who are these people who are getting their rent paid and their phone paid and flat screen TVs from welfare?
I think perhaps such things used to happen, but I don’t see any signs of it these days—absent outright fraud, I guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.