Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz: Reverse Obama’s disastrous missile defense policies to keep Putin in check
Friendswood Journal ^ | March 19, 2014 | Ted Cruz

Posted on 03/19/2014 12:08:48 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

WASHINGTON, D.C. - With a few strokes of his pen, Vladimir Putin has in recent days both created the Republic of Crimea and annexed that new entity into the Russian Federation, thereby violating the territorial integrity of Ukraine. To hear Putin tell it in his address to the Duma, this action is not only perfectly legal, it also rights a historical wrong in which Russia was “robbed” of its rightful claim to the Crimean peninsula in 1954.

President Obama has disputed the legality of these actions, observing that “President Putin seems to have a different set of lawyers making a different set of interpretations, but I don’t think that’s fooling anyone.” The reality, however, is that Putin is not concerned with international law or historical justice. His sole focus is on correcting what he considers to be the “greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century” by reassembling the Soviet Union. Ukraine is only a step in this process. That is the real challenge the United States has to face, which we cannot do when we are agonizing over what our respective legal teams think.

There is an historical model we can consult for guidance in this crisis, as deterring Soviet aggression without engaging in military conflict was exactly what President Ronald Reagan had in mind when he proposed the Strategic Defense Initiative thirty-one years ago next Sunday.

The genius of SDI was that it did not recklessly attack the Soviets but rather neutralized their threat through our technological advantage. Derided as a “Star Wars” style fantasy that was impossible to realize, President Reagan’s vision was a major component in the effort that brought down the Soviet Union without firing a shot, as no one ever started a war with a weapon called missile defense.

The Obama administration has unfortunately shown little enthusiasm for missile defense, beginning with the decision to cancel plans for a ballistic missile defense system in Central Europe, announced on the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland on September 17, 2009. This pattern continued with the arbitrary and unnecessary concessions made to the Russians limiting our global deployment of missile defense in the New START that was implemented in 2011 and remains in force until 2021.

Most recently, on March 14th the Government Accountability Office released a report titled “Regional Missile Defense: DOD’s Report Provided Limited Information; Assessment of Acquisition Risks is Optimistic.” It provides the depressing assessment that what missile defense programs we still have planned in Europe are going to be delayed to the tune of years because of technological glitches and cost overruns—a failure that would not have been tolerated if missile defense was a priority for the Commander in Chief.

This report could not have come at a more inopportune time, but perhaps it can serve as a wake-up call that President Obama’s policies on both Russia and missile defense have collapsed and should be immediately reversed through the following actions:

• The President should begin the process of withdrawing from New START according to the provision of Article XIV(3) of the Treaty, which declares “Each party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events related to the subject matter of this Treaty have jeopardized its supreme interests;”

• The Secretary of Defense should engage in a full re-assessment of our missile defense posture in Europe with the purpose of restoring or expanding the installations cancelled in 2009; and

• The Secretary of Defense should, in conjunction with this work, engage in a thorough review of the delays and costs over-runs of the existing missile defense programs for Europe with the goal of accelerating their scheduled implementation.

These simple steps would send a clear and unequivocal signal to Vladimir Putin that the United States is unafraid to stand with our allies for our own national security interests.

Today his sights are set on Ukraine, but if he continues undeterred tomorrow it could be Estonia, Latvia, Moldova, Romania, the Czech Republic, or Poland. Meeting his challenge now with strength, not appeasement, would be the best way to ensure that this does not happen, and that we do not squander our hard-won Cold War victory over the Soviets.

TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; US: Texas; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: crimea; cruz; czechrepublic; estonia; europeanunion; foreignaffairs; germany; latvia; moldova; nationalsecurity; nato; poland; putin; putinsbuttboys; romania; russia; surrendermonkeys; tedcruz; texas; unitedkingdom; waronterror

1 posted on 03/19/2014 12:08:48 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The Secretary of Defense should....

This assumes we have a SecDef who is not carrying Obummers water and can go 24 hours without having a drink

2 posted on 03/19/2014 12:29:51 PM PDT by capydick (''Life's's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capydick
Cruz should zip it on this issue.

We're at war with the Islamists and on that more important issue, we have been supported by the Russians.

We should be striving to become more 'equal partners' for the future.

3 posted on 03/19/2014 12:44:06 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Another difference between Putin and mom-jeans Obama: Putin has a pen and doesn’t need a phone.

4 posted on 03/19/2014 12:48:21 PM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckln

huh? We had this in place until 2009 with no constraints on our efforts against Islamist terror. Obama killed it, and has pretty much undermined the other at the same time.

5 posted on 03/19/2014 12:52:36 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Tell like it is, Ted. This man will be president.

6 posted on 03/19/2014 12:53:07 PM PDT by Red White and Blue patriot (USA all the way. Love it or Leave it. Better dead than Red. Putin = Hitler 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckln

Are you lost?

7 posted on 03/20/2014 2:24:22 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I don't think so.

Mac , during the Korean war, wanted to bomb and invade China. Truman then sacked him.

At the end of WW1 Patton wanted to militarily take on the Russians. Truman didn't think to much of that stupid idea. Patton got killed in a car accident before he could be sacked, for the second time.

Well, McCain, He wants to bomb the crap out of everyone.

Three crazies if there ever were any.

8 posted on 03/20/2014 11:23:09 AM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson